Tennessee Volunteers vs. Georgia Bulldogs: game preview
Stats and stuff after the jump, but first the keys to the game:
- Whichever team does the best job of getting its offense going against a very good defense should win this game. Tennessee's defense appears to be a bit better than Georgia's, but the Bulldogs' offense is much better than Tennessee's, so the odds are that Georgia will get this done first and best.
- What the Vols do best on offense is run the ball, but the Dawgs are built to stop the run, so Nick Stephens and the Tennessee receivers are going to have to figure heavily into the game plan if the Vols are to have a chance.
- Begin your commercial break early, on fourth down just before Tennessee punts. You won't miss anything but catastrophe. Unless you like that sort of thing.
- Both teams will be highly motivated. While Tennessee and its coaching staff historically do their best in Games No One Is Giving Us A Chance In Perdition to Win, it just doesn't appear that they're good enough on offense to pull off the upset this time, especially against a team that is as motivated as they are. Consider the game a potential tipping point for the Fulmer Era.
Okay, so the stats:
Tennessee rush v. Georgia defense |
Tennessee pass v. Georgia defense |
Georgia rush v. Tennessee defense |
Georgia pass v. Tennessee defense |
61 |
98 |
13 |
12 |
4 |
59 |
50 |
23 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Field Goals |
Tennessee punting v. Georgia punt return |
Georgia punting v. Tennessee punt return |
Intangibles |
T-35 |
115 |
51 |
|
T-37 |
3 |
42 |
|
Push |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
So, yeah. Which is better, Georgia's defense or Tennessee's defense? Here's an easier one for you: which is worse, Georgia's offense or Tennessee's? Uh-huh.
Here's how the teams look next to each other in each of the key statistical categories currently used in the RTT Ready, Fire, Aim BlogPoll Computer Ballot:
Rank |
Team |
WL |
SOS |
PED |
RD |
3DO |
TD |
PEO |
EXP |
OPPG |
TO |
3DD |
AVG R |
W AVG |
14 |
![]() |
24 |
8 |
59 |
4 |
20 |
22 |
26 |
90 |
43 |
30 |
31 |
32.45 |
91.48 |
81 |
![]() |
73 |
88 |
12 |
13 |
100 |
5 |
109 |
45 |
26 |
97 |
74 |
58.36 |
231.10 |
Yeah, we're 5th in the nation in total defense. But holster that woo, boys, because we're 97th in total offense, and we're going against a team apparently built to stop what we do best, and they've compiled excellent defensive statistics against very good competition.
Aaaand the strength of schedule stuff:
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
So what's it all mean?
-
What? We're going to have to pass? You'd think that our only real chance on offense against the Dawgs would be to run the ball, but despite the fact that it is the best thing we do with the ball and despite the fact that it should be something we're really good at, 61st in the nation really isn't that good, is it? Add to that that we'll be going against the nation's fourth best rushing defense, and don't be surprised if we have trouble moving the ball on the ground. But look at this. As poorly as we've shown so far in the passing game (98th in the nation), Georgia's not been that good defending the pass (59th). The disparity between the Vols' rushing ranking and the Dawg's rush defense ranking is 57 positions, but the disparity in the passing game is only 39 positions. Dare I say it? Do we need to focus on the passing game to beat Georgia? Airsick bags are behind the Skymiles in the pocket in front of you.
-
When Georgia has the ball. Any advantage the Vols might have on defense appears to be less than Georgia's apparent advantage on the other side of the ball. Yeah, we're doing very well against both the run and the pass, but the Bulldogs are a well-balanced team with the 23rd-best passing attack in the nation and a Heisman trophy contender running the ball. Still, there is some slight glimmer of hope. After all, if we stopped them last year with a rush defense ranked 88th in the nation, we can do the same thing with a rush defense ranked 13th, right? Right? Hello?!
-
Special teams. Run! Hide! Cover your eyes and plug your ears! Sing happy songs!
-
Intangibles. The aftertaste of Georgia's 2007 and 2006 losses to Tennessee, by 21 and 18 points respectively, is surely the bitterest of bittery bitter. The Bulldogs, coming off a preseason No. 1 ranking, were embarrassed on national t.v. two weeks ago by Alabama and had a week off to think about it. Tennessee's program is absolutely reeling, struggling even against lower-level competition, and its offense can't find any rhythm. Intangibles are by their very nature hard to figure, so these things really could go either way. Both teams will be highly motivated at the beginning of the game. At the end of the game, one of them will be clinically depressed.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
My 5 concerns about the game are...
1). UT has virtually nothing to lose.
2.) Most of our offensive stats have come against non-SEC opponents.
3) We have struggled to run the ball against teams with good defensive lines (see So.Car. and Alabama)
4) Have shown no ability no to pressure the QB (again see So. Car. and Alabama)
5) Injuries.
The good news is we had a bye to prepare and we get Brannan Southerland back. He won’t win the game for us but it’s a huge upgrade in run blocking, pass protection, and short yardage situations.
by deanpat92 on Oct 9, 2008 2:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And in counterpoint:
1) UT will be coached as if it has nothing to gain and everything to lose.
2) Most of our offensive stats [snicker] have come against non-SEC opponents.
3) We have struggled to run the ball anywhere between a 20-yard line and an end zone, and have struggled to pass, period.
4) Have shown the ability to play as if there was pressure on the QB, even if none exists.
5) No injuries. (Thereby relegating our best players to the sidelines while the seniors get their time in the sun.)
For us, the good news is that anything in the above points regarding passing are now thrown in doubt with a new QB behind the center. It doesn’t mean the offense will actually open up or anything, but perhaps we won’t fumble a handoff within spitting distance of a goal line.
Normally, when a 4-1 team (who has just been exposed in their last game) plays a 2-3 team, the 4-1 team has all the pressure. But given the acidic environment in Knoxville and that this is an elimination game* for UT in the SEC race, UT will have plenty of pressure as well. I see a real chance for UT to win, but only if the offense finally comes together and the defense holds up for one more weekend.
- - By “elimination game”, I mean the elimination of the possibility. At 2 losses, UT is a long shot. At 3 losses, we’re done.
by Hooper on Oct 9, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Darned auto-formatting.
That bullet point was an asterisk when I typed it. I swarez.
by Hooper on Oct 9, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Add to the early list:
if UT trails by 2 scores at the beginning of the 4th quarter, go ahead and pencil in the loss. The clock will run down way too fast for anything but a perfect 4th quarter to overcome that. (Yes, this is one of my new crusades. I want my football back.)
by Hooper on Oct 9, 2008 4:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Where is Antonio Wardlow?
We could really use another blocked punt this game, sigh…
by Getoffmyvols on Oct 10, 2008 10:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















