THE CASE FOR MIKE LEACH AS TENNESSEE VOLUNTEER HEAD COACH
A couple of days ago, Clay Travis posted a link to this in-depth 2005 article by Michael Lewis about Texas Tech head coach Mike Leach. While I was devouring that article and fleshing my thoughts into the post you’re about to read, Clay was posting his own endorsement of Mike Leach. We're both right. Mike Leach should be Tennessee's next head coach because he's having great success challenging the traditional notions and customs of college football, his offense is explosive, he has a defense to go with it, and he would make it all fun again.
The Space Offense
Most would likely call Leach’s offense a spread, but it may be more precise to call it a “space offense.” Yes, he spreads players out to get playmakers in space, but it's more than just that. Leach isn’t just seeking room for his players to move, he’s looking at the entire field from a geometrical perspective. He moves folks around in such a way as to alter the environment in which the players are moving, effectively changing the size and shape of the field.
Take the offensive line as just one example. The linemen line up with huge gaps between them. You’d think that would mean that defenders would simply rush right through those gaps and get at the quarterback before he could do anything about it, but that’s not what happens. The wide gaps force the defenders to spread out themselves to cover all of the possibilities presented by the wide o-line. The defensive line spreading out means that the defensive ends have further to run to get the QB, and it means that the quarterback has much wider passing lanes through which to see the field and get the ball to the receivers.
Mike Leach isn’t the only coach using wide-gap o-lines. Most coaches employing some version of the spread use them as well. But with Leach, it’s more like he uses wide gaps because he views the entire game differently than because he figured out a new way to get the old job done.
Forget everything you knew
Leveraging space and geometry isn’t the only thing that Leach does differently than most. He couldn’t care less about time of possession. He’d much rather eat up the scoreboard than devour the clock, and it doesn’t appear to matter how much time is left in the game. His goal is to run 90 plays per game rather than the 65-75 plays most teams run. His drives generally don’t last much longer than two minutes. He’d much rather try to gain a first down than punt the ball. He’d much rather pass the ball than run it, and he doesn’t think much of the idea that a team has to be balanced to win. No, he considers his team balanced if five receivers all gain 1,000 yards on the season. In a world of power and strength, his teams are conditioned for speed and endurance.
Heresy!
Will Tennessee and its fan base accept such an affront to its tradition? All of those notions are anathema to Tennessee’s tradition, which has been to pound the rock for three yards and a cloud of dust, to play a conservative field-position game and to chew up the clock. Would the Tennessee establishment embrace any of Leach’s offensive nonsense?
If only they give it a chance, they will. Texas Tech was apparently a run-first, time of possession type team prior to Leach’s arrival. After the initial shock, they warmed up to the innovation because it worked.
Consdier this, too. How jazzed were Tennessee fans prior to this season simply because we were going to see a new style of offense? Turns out the Clawfense was too complicated. Not so with Leach’s space offense. His offensive philosophy is to create as much confusion for the defense as possible while also keeping things as simple as possible for his offensive players. "There's two ways to make it more complex for the defense," Leach says. "One is to have a whole bunch of different plays, but that's no good because then the offense experiences as much complexity as the defense. Another is a small number of plays and run it out of lots of different formations. That way, you don't have to teach a guy a new thing to do. You just have to teach him new places to stand.”
Leach has no playbook. His quarterback has a wristband with plays written on it, and Leach has what appears to be notes on a napkin in his palm on the sideline. That’s it. Lewis described the offensive philosophy as a mood: “optimism. It is designed to maximize the possibility of something good happening rather than to minimize the possibility of something bad happening.” I like the sound of that precisely because it is different from what we’ve been doing for so long.
Just because it’s simple doesn’t mean it isn’t exciting. In fact, the word explosive doesn’t quite do it justice. Have a look:
FULL SCREEN VERSION
That’s not a new thing for Tech in 2008, either. In 2004 against TCU, the Horned Frogs led 21-0 with eight minutes left in the second quarter. Tech finished the game 70-35. A few games later, Tech had been leading Nebraska 14-3 late in the first half and ended up winning 70-10.
FULL SCREEN VERSION
FULL SCREEN VERSION
As Lewis describes it, “It's as if his opponent's defense has some deep dark secret that takes time for his offense to extract.” Once he finds it, game over, man.
And if that doesn’t sell you, maybe this will. Leach’s offense does not have an off switch. He will continue to try to score no matter the score, no matter the game clock, no matter the opponent. Urban Meyer, we’re coming for you.
Quick turn-arounds
Quickly now, because I’m running out of time. Dude’s got head coaching experience. He was the offensive coordinator for Kentucky from 1997-1998. Prior to his arrival, the Wildcats’ QB passed for 967 yards. Under Leach, Tim Couch passed for 3,884 yards his first year and 4,275 yards his second.
Leach then went off to Oklahoma to be the Sooners’ offensive coordinator. That year, Oklahoma went from 101st to 8th in the country in offensive scoring. The next year, the Sooners won the national championship running Leach’s offense even though Leach had left for Texas Tech.
Leach has been the head coach for Texas Tech since 2000. He’s 75-37 and averaging eight wins a season. Not bad, not great, but remember that this is Texas Tech. They were basically a six-win school prior to Leach’s arrival. Think of Texas Tech in the Big 12 South with Texas and Oklahoma as essentially the same as South Carolina in the SEC East. He basically added two wins per season at a school with significant disadvantages. It’s easier to be successful at a tradition-rich school because players want to go there for that reason. Having success at a school that has trouble recruiting is a better indicator of the coach’s value. Yes, Tech is in Texas, but they have to compete with all of the Texas schools as well as Oklahoma and everybody else in the nation who knows that Texas and Florida have great talent.
Making it fun again
Finally, having Leach would make it fun to be a Volunteer football fan again. The guy is just entertaining. He’s intelligent: top third in his law school class at Pepperdine. He’s wise: he asked himself why he wanted to be a lawyer and then chose to become a coach instead. He keeps things fresh and interesting with some new curious interest each season, whether it’s pirates, Geronimo, Daniel Boone, whales, chimpanzees, grizzly bears, or Jackson Pollock.
And he’s an absolute quote machine. He believes that both failure and success can slow you down:
When they fail, they become frustrated. When they have success, they want to become the thinking-man's football team. They start having these quilting bees, these little bridge parties at the line of scrimmage.
He ribs his rivals:
How come [the A&M cadets] get to pretend they are soldiers? The thing is, they aren't actually in the military. I ought to have Mike's Pirate School. The freshmen, all they get is the bandanna. When you're a senior, you get the sword and skull and crossbones. For homework, we'll work pirate maneuvers and stuff like that.
And more. Go read Lewis’ fantastic article.
But seriously, what about recruiting?
If you’re concerned about his recruiting, think about this. If he can do what he’s done at Texas Tech, a school that basically picks up the scraps from the other excellent Texas schools, just imagine what he could do with a school with a history of getting national recruits.
Conclusion
We’ve heard a lot of talk about some folks wishing Steve Spurrier had come to coach the Vols awhile ago or wanting him to now. Basically, what they’re saying is that they want the Spurrier who introduced innovation to the SEC and changed the league forever. You don’t want Spurrier, you want what Spurrier did back then. Mike Leach is now what Spurrier was then: a guy challenging the system and winning because he’s thinking differently than everyone else.
Perhaps some other traditionalist would be a better fit for Tennessee. I’m no athletic director or football expert. But I am a guy who last year made the case for Trooper Taylor as Tennessee’s next offensive coordinator. Just saying.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm apprehensive
But you do make a good case here. People will forgive the affront to tradition if we start winning, that much we can agree on.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
Yeah
And Holly mentioned in another thread that she’d heard some negative things about how Leach treats his players. I don’t like the sound of that and would like to know more.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 11, 2008 9:07 AM EST up reply actions
Perhaps the thing that you may be
referring to is that Leach is typically not afraid to call out a player after a game, whereas many coaches will take the blame himself. I think there are plenty of Texas Tech fans who don’t appreciate this, but I would like to point out that Shannon Woods was essentially kicked off the team last year and sent home from the Gator Bowl for violation of team rules.
He was very clear that he didn’t like the way that Woods performance, whether it be off the field on on, was acceptable. Being open and honest with Woods could have gone two directions. Woods could have sulked and gone on his merry way or he could have worked his way back into the starting lineup.
Lucky for us, it was the latter.
In fact against OSU, starting defensive tackle Brandon Sesay was held out of last week’s game for some sort of disciplinary reason. No reason was given, but Leach will not stand for behavior, again in the classroom or otherwise, detrimental to the team. Not having Sesay could have been disastrous against an OSU team that has run on almost every opponent, but it didn’t stop him from keeping him out. No public comment was given as to Sesay’s absence, so he doesn’t call out every player, but he’s not afraid of a little discipline either.
Leach is not a fan of entitlement for any of his players and personally, I don’t think this is such a bad thing.
Go Raiders . . .
Double-T Nation
Ooh
Hear that, Vol fans? “not a fan of entitlement for any of his players.” Hmm.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 11, 2008 9:41 AM EST up reply actions
Oh, and thanks Seth
Appreciate the insight from another Tech fan.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 11, 2008 9:42 AM EST up reply actions
If we do in fact make the hire.
I think there would be some serious growing pains in introducing the current players to Leach’s coaching style. I don’t know… I personally think Leach is really just the flavor of the month and hes not a long term solution. Then again I also honestly thought Crompton was going to be one of the top 3 quarterbacks in the conference this year… so I’m probably not the guy to ask.
Don't let me stifle any dissent
Nobody knows until after it happens. You’re talking to the guy who played a significant role in the over-hyping of the Clawfense.
The flavor of the month is a valid concern. But I’m thinking he’s like Meyer at Utah, but at a lower-level team in a BCS conference. Remember, many were saying that Meyer’s system wouldn’t work in the SEC. Uh-huh.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 11, 2008 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
Good Point
Similar case with Paul Johnson’s system in the ACC. One thing I do really like about Leach is he appears fearless which is a quality you need to go toe to toe with the coaches he’ll have to scheme against in the SEC.
by Getoffmyvols on Nov 11, 2008 10:05 AM EST up reply actions
I will say
If he were hired, it would only be a matter of time before someone built a pirate ship to sail with the Vol Navy. Which would be unspeakably awesome.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
by rustytanton on Nov 11, 2008 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
And mount river-facing cannons on Neyland Stadium.
Oh, man, would that change the fireworks after a touchdown…
by David Hooper on Nov 11, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
Wait a minute..
he has a defense to go with it
Whoa…Texas Tech does NOT play defense. Don’t you read all of the comments across the interweb? Don’t you watch the sports talking heads? Ask any SEC fan, or Aggie, or Longhorn. Defense is simply not tolerated by us Red Raider fans.
No, but seriously, Leach has been underrated in his previous 7 years here. Some of the reasons you give to hire him are the very reasons our opponents and rivals give for reasons he will “never be successful” and get his team to the upper echelon of the league. Why, after the A&M game he was lambasted for scoring the last TD against a poor, defenseless aggie team. They said it was his “classless” behavior that would forever keep him at a mid-tier program with no hope for success. His reasons were clear – he was rewarding the play of the RB’s, namely Woods.
He also graduates his players, and keeps their heads in the books. In fact, he has kept his team one of the top ten in graduation rates.
WAIT…I MEAN…MIKE LEACH SUCKS! YOU DON’T WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIM! HE’S A PROGRAM KILLER AND HAS NO CLASS! IT’S ALL SMOKE AND MIRRORS I SAY!
You guys are awesome.
All my life, I’ve had a general policy to cheer against any Texas team, no matter the sport. (It started as a Cowboys thing that really cemented when the Landry firing was so badly managed.) But I have to admit that Tech has me wavering on that one. Last Saturday, I actually found myself rooting for Tech.
It felt so wrong, yet it felt so right…
by David Hooper on Nov 11, 2008 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
Give in
Let yourself enjoy the offensive mastery that is Texas Tech.
On a serious note, it did take us folks in Texas quite a while to warm up to Leach. His iron fist with the meida access to the players, his goofy halftime interviews, his note card offensive play book, going for it on 4th down on our own 25 in the second qtr, stuff like that. Some old timers in Lubbock appreciate what he’s done for the program but won’t shed many tears if he leaves.
His loyalty is not all that solid, either. He’s flirted with other schools every year he’s been at Tech and would do the same thing in Tennessee. That does get a bit old.
Finally, it ain’t an easy transition. While the playbook is small, the line of scrimmage adjustments are HUGE. Each receiver has approximately five routes to pick from based on the defensive alignment. We had a pretty steep learning curve the first few years. It would take a couple of seasons to really see the benefit, but I guess that’s true of any new system.
At the end of the day, if he does leave for Knoxville, it will pump a lot of energy into a program that is viewed (our here anyway) as stodgy and dull. Big stadium, great fans, but not much excitement.
Here's the question I have for you, since we're all speculating like mad over here.
If Leach happened to come to Knox Vegas (and I think it’s a rather large if right now), would you be more supportive or less supportive of the Vols than you are now? I’m assuming you’re rather meh about them simply for a lack of cause. Would that even change?
But yes: great stadium, (usually) great fans, very stodgy style. Like the Orange Creamsicle we used to get from the ice cream truck, it’s a fan favorite, but it has remained unchanged for the last umpteen billion years.
by David Hooper on Nov 11, 2008 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
Well,
I have some in-laws that now live in Little Rock, but they spent the better part of 20 years in Knoxville cheering the Vols on. They still make one game a year out that way. I’ve always been a fan of southern football in general (full disclosure: my dad went to Auburn, so I was raised on it), but when Bill Bates was a Vol, I was hooked. Yeah, I know. I’m really dating myself here, but I’ve always enjoyed watching Tenn, even if the band needs pick and choose its spots on when to play Rocky Top. That’s almost as annoying as Texas playing their fight song after nearly every play. I will probably follow the program MUCH closer if Leach becomes the man there…if only to see if the system success can be replicated against allegedly supperior SEC defenses. I believe strongly that it can.
Allegedly superior?
That is funny :) The SEC dominates every other conference out there even this year when it is viewed as “down”. That said, I do hope we get Leach in. I WOULD like to see how it translates over. It would also be a nice shot of excitement into the program.
Help me out here:
The WR route combinations: where are they based off (or where did they originate, which I guess is more my question)? I figure / guess there’s more than a bit of the old Run ‘n’ Shoot in there, but I’m curious to see how much switching action takes place.
by Chris Pendley on Nov 11, 2008 1:28 PM EST up reply actions
You might remember a variation of it...
…from when Leach was OC at Kentucky. It’s basically Hal Mumme’s “Air Raid” offense with a couple of extra wrinkles thrown in.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
I do
I’m trying to track the Air Raid – that’s what I was getting at.
by Chris Pendley on Nov 11, 2008 6:02 PM EST up reply actions
He’s taken elements of a bunch of systems and made them his own. It’s not really the run and shoot, per se and it’s not anything like the WCO. There are even veer elements transitioned to the WR routes.
A big part of the offense is dragging two guys across the middle with a third cutting the opposite way underneath and one or two more going deep. Then there’s the RB you have account for. It just creates too much confusion in a zone, and if you play man, you’ll get destroyed by it.
I'm throwing caution to the wind.
Fine, Joel. I hope your happy. Even though I was the wet noodle whining about player development and recruiting in an earlier topic about Leach, I’m going to drink the kool aid. I’m thumbing a ride on the Leach Wagon. And all it took was some drive charts in full screen that made me a little dizzy and frankly a little motion sick. 56, 70, and 70. What is that?
Consider that:
The Electric Clawfense has scored…..17 touchdowns through ten games.
Tech has scored…..63.
Clawfense: 7 picks out 292 attempts.
Tech: 6 picks out of 499 attempts.
Clawfense: 305 rushes, 1043 yards, 3.4 ypc.
Tech: 257 rushes, 1326 yards, 5.2 ypc.
Well played, Sir. I’m in. It won’t be hard for our Navy to go rouge will it?
Someday we'll look back on this and plow into a parked car.
Yarr!
Resistance is futile.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 11, 2008 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
Wow
That rushing stat (the Tech one) is not at all what I would expect.
I think we should take the chance on him. Greater risks reap greater rewards.
I would be happy with Butch Davis as a consolation prize, though.
IMHO, unless we get one of those two guys, we will be selling ourselves short.
He’s a very high risk-high reward personality. Tennessee has to be viewed as a pretty risky move v. the situation at Tech, but that’s what he normally thrives on. Throw $3.5/yr at him and he’ll jump.
Throw him a pirate ship of his own and he'll jump
I will stubbornly believe this.
by Chris Pendley on Nov 11, 2008 6:17 PM EST up reply actions
It would be AWESOME if UT made that part of the deal
I would support him being hired as coach for that clause in his contract alone.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
The Vol Navy can become the Vol Pirate Army pretty easily, right?
I mean, we already have the ships. Sails are cheap.
by Chris Pendley on Nov 12, 2008 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
Imagine this. The Volunteer Navy goes crazy with Pirate flags that look like…..
THIS:
And then instead of these mega million dollar yachts moored neatly to each other side by side, we go for ultimate chaos…..cacophony even. YEAH. Something like…..
THIS:
I mean the Vol Navy is nice and all, but I feel a little outclassed. I’m embarrassed to board fearing my deck shoes are much too…..Wal-martish. If Mike Leach takes his U-Haul to Knoxpatch….let the Pirates take over the high seas of the Tennessee!!
Someday we'll look back on this and plow into a parked car.
by MeytonPanning on Nov 12, 2008 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
In all honesty...
I read this post just because it was in all-caps and kept showing up in the “Around SBN” tagline.
Leach
As a Tech fan, I hope Tennessee doesn’t have the balls, and he tells you politely no thanks. You’d be crazy not to talk to the guy.
The rushing game is something new this year, and it’s not like we haven’t had good running backs before. There are various opinions here. It could be taking advantage of having such a versatile (and huge) O-line or it could be that he’s finally getting away from a bull-headed notion that he didn’t need a running game – that screens and drop-offs to the backs were just as good.
In any event, I like the new results. Years of 8-4 were just enough to keep the frustration level maxed out. I’d hate to see what Leach could do with a first-class defensive coordinator (nothing against ours now) and a school with the tradition, location, and facilities to draw 5-star recruits. I grew up in west Texas so I like it, but have you ever been to Lubbock? I imagine many potential recruits leave the near-desert dustbowl in shock.
With that said, LEAVE OUR COACH ALONE. :-)
Mike Leach will not be able to do the following:
1) Recruit against the Urban Meyers, Spurriers of the SEC
2) Bow down to the administration, fans, good ol’ boys, or deep pocketed alums. He runs his own pirate ship.
3) Win your SEC or NC championship in the 3-4 yours that you expect to have one. (see Charlie Weis).
4) Play traditional football—punting on 4th downs, pass on 4th and 1.
I say Tennessee goes for the following:
1) Lane Kiffen
2) Will Muschamp
3) Major Applewhite
4) Boise State Head Coach Chris Peterson
5) Gary Pinkel
At the end of the day, Leach stays at Tech and there will be buildings, roads, and stadiums named after this man.
I disagree
First Off, Spurrier is not the recruiter he once was, and with Leach’s name recognition and system alone will attract skill players, plus UT has the biggest recruiting budget in all of college football. Bow down to who? Fans want him, the administration wants to appease fans and alumni with wins, Leach will certainly get more than 3 wins, right? SEC championship and NC are always wanted, but we will be patient. I think mainly people just want Tennessee to be relevant again, and the championships will follow, I’m certain of that. Traditional football? I don’t think you guys understand that concept. We don’t get 4th and 1. We run for 3, run for 2, sack for loss of 9, punt on 4th and 14. Additionally, Hooper has been advocating the 4 down offense and I think, as the popular saying goes these days, “It’s time for Change”. Mike Leach is certainly “Change we can believe in”.
As for your coaching suggestions:
1) Maybe, leaning no.
2) No
3) Definately No
4) Yes, but not first choice
5) Maybe, leaning no.
As for me, I’m in the Charlie Strong camp. Anybody that can get us an edge on recruiting in Florida and Georgia and a vast knowledge of Urban Meyer’s offensive and special teams systems and is a big plus in my book. Additionally, He gets fired up, but stays poised and focused, unlike Mr. Will “Boom Mother F’er” Muchamp. Defense still wins in the SEC and nothings going to change that. That being said, I’m very much open to Leach.
Strong is 1a, Leach is 1b on my list.
At least we still have Eric Berry

by 


























