So what do Tennessee Volunteer football fans want in a new head coach?
As the Tennessee administration goes looking for a new coach to succeed The Papa, fans and media everywhere are compiling their lists of potential candidates. Only a few folks, though, have actually devoted much time to determining exactly what factors on which such a major decision should be based.
The Tennessean has identified a few: "the ability to recruit top talent from across the country, a marketable personality to reenergize the fan base, and someone with a long-term plan to maintain stability." Clay Travis has a six pronged suggestion (because lawyers always prong things): (1) pay whatever it takes to get somebody who is (2) younger than 50 years old with (3) head coaching experience who is both (4) intelligent and (5) a great recruiter and who (6) strikes fear into the hearts of opponents. Others have suggested that getting a Tennessee alum who loves his alma mater is of the utmost importance. I would like also like to see somebody who puts a premium on molding kids into responsible adults.
So I ask you:
1. What do you think are the primary characteristics Tennessee should be looking for in a head coach?
2. What do you think is the relative importance of those characteristics?
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Someone who is a tireless recruiter. You have to work harder at Tennessee than at other schools because of the lack of in-state talent.
Someone who will be here for a long time. I think stability is even more important at Tennessee than it is elsewhere because of the aforementioned talent gap in Tennessee vs. elsewhere. So probably a youngish candidate.
Someone who will develop players after they’re recruited. This is arguably one of the biggest deficiencies of the Phil Fulmer era, especially post-2001.
Someone who can stand up to the relentless media scrutiny. This is a tall order, and unless we get someone who has already coached at this level, we won’t really know until the spotlight is on them.
Someone who embraces our tradition. That doesn’t mean living in the past, it means, well, not being Bill Callahan.
Someone with a distinctive style of play that will give Tennessee football an identity in the years to come. Nick Saban is a defensive mastermind known for ferocious 3-4 defenses. Urban Meyer is known for high-powered, fun-to-watch spread offenses. Tennessee at times has been 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust, at times has been Wide Receiver U, and now seems to lack an identity. We need something to hang our hats on that will give opponents something extra to think about.
Someone who is a disciplinarian. For whatever reason, possibly because we’re in the South where people are raised with more servile attitudes, kids who come to play for the Vols seem to respond to tough love. This isn’t USC.
—
I have no idea how to prioritize any of this, sorry. It’s all important.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
Yeah
It is all important. We can save the prioritization for later.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 5, 2008 1:34 PM EST up reply actions
It's what we had
Joel’s statement of “…somebody who puts a premium on molding kids into responsible adults.” + Rusty’s comments = what we had in The Papa. Unfortunately our “fans” forced him out as soon as wins became scarceer than in the past seasons.
I hate it, and strongly disagree with it, but it sounds like our “fans” simply want a guy who wins games at any cost.
All I know is
I don’t think a spread guy is the way to go. I think the spread will be figured out in 5-10 years and guys like Mike Leach and Brian Kelly will be a dime a dozen.
And I agree with you Aerobab. When I think of all the qualities I would look for in a coach, Fulmer pretty much fits the mold.
The tears of unfathomable sadness!
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
Then here's a guaranteed formula:
Find some wizard football genius hot chick. She’d be absolutely killer on the recruiting trail. The first time she whips his Florida team, she could then act all cute and stereotypical blonde-ish about it.
Tee-hee> Is that how this game works? Golly, we won! giggle Tee-hee! Where’s my helium?
Oh, yeah…. tears…
;-)
by David Hooper on Nov 5, 2008 10:46 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Not quite old enough yet.
There’s always next time, I believe.
by David Hooper on Nov 5, 2008 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
rec'd
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
You know what's really interesting
is that “wins” isn’t on anyone’s list yet. Sure, it’s almost certainly assumed, but you’d think someone would have mentioned it. And it’s perhaps the only thing that led to where we are.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 6, 2008 6:35 AM EST reply actions
Yeah
That was the point. You mentioned them in sort of a negative context. It was really the only reason for Fulmer’s firing. And the point was that despite that, “somebody who wins” hasn’t shown up as even a factor in determining who should be the next coach, much less “the” factor.
I find that very, very interesting. It gives credence to Rich Brooks’ recent comments, which I’m not going to research, but the gist was something to the effect that there’s danger in simply sticking around too long. And that’s a real shame.
Go Vols!
by Joel Hollingsworth on Nov 6, 2008 8:55 AM EST up reply actions
My one criteria
Thinking it over a bit, I want somebody who will love the players as if they were his own family like how Fulmer did. I’m ok with the Lombardi winning=onlything mentality at the pro level, where football is a job; I’m not really ok with it at the college level. There’s certainly no requirement that a coach care that much about the livelihoods of the players, but it’s a special thing to have. The same applies to professors; the ones I remember best are the ones who cared about their students as people.
We’ll get somebody who is a good coach and recruiter; that’s not really in doubt. (It doesn’t guarantee they’ll succeed here, but they’ll be good at those phases of the job nonetheless.) How much they really care about the players is a different question.

by 























