Bowl Games: Early Hits and Misses
For the second time in 4 years, Vol Nation gets to enjoy bowl season the same way I usually enjoyed it as a Wyoming fan: from the warm, cushy comfort of the recliner in front of the TV. When your favorite team isn't in a bowl game, a lot of the excitement of the bowl season disappears. But there are still a lot of football games out there, and for the most part, the games pair up some pretty good matchups. Occasionally, the conference tie-in requirements produce some screwy results, but those games can be easily ignored (a feat that is much safer to do when you know that your own team isn't in one of those games...).
So I'd like to take a look at the bowl games and see which ones are worth watching and which ones are worth skipping. As I've said waaaaay too many times already, I'm in it for the entertainment. I don't really care so much who's playing, but whether the game should be decent.
Let's look first at the earliest 11 games. (Later we'll look at the middle 11 and the final 12.) Below are my quick knee-jerk opinions on the games. I have done absolutely no research and am relying solely on the trickle of information I have picked up through the season, so my opinions carry about as much merit as a Harris Poll voter. So feel free to leave your opinions - informed or otherwise - below.
EagleBank Bowl Wake Forest v. Navy
I think this one's interesting. Both are perennial feel-good kinda stories: teams that shouldn't do well but tend to outperform expectations. Both are well-coached and well-quarterbacked. Both are reasonable on defense. All in all, it's enough to be compelling. Having the game in D.C. means that neither team really travels much, which should help avoid a disappointing performance.
New Mexico Bowl Colorado State v. Fresno State
As a MWC guy, I should find this interesting. I don't. There's not much to say, really; CSU is still a long way away from their idea of "good"; Fresno is no longer a novelty with that perennial David v. Goliath attitude they carry. This one probably won't interrupt my day.
MagicJack St. Petersburg Bowl Memphis v. South Florida
See New Mexico Bowl. Replace FSU with USF. Replace CSU with MSU. Really, that's how it feels to me.
Pioneer Las Vegas Bowl BYU v. Arizona
Love it! BYU is a MWC team that plays it old school. As in, when the MWC teams were the WAC and were known for 52-51 type games every weekend. All offense, no defense. Arizona is much better than you're used to thinking, and have had some impressive showings. They should be excited about playing a team that once had brief NC game mentions this year. I don't know if conference pride will be a factor, but that whole 1-6 thing vs. the MWC has to sting the PAC-10. Here's their chance.
R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl Southern Miss v. Troy
Meh. Sorry, Doc Saturday. I can't even muster up any John Madden "Brett Favre played at Southern Miss" excitement over this.
San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl Boise State v. TCU
How did THIS game land before Christmas?!? Seriously, this is a fantastic matchup, and easily outstrips all but perhaps 4 or 5 matchups involving BCS teams this year. Here's all you need to know, and it applies to both teams: well-coached, great talent for mid-majors, confident, well-schemed for the talent, unafraid of a spotlight. If bowl games were rated by the quality of the matchup per dollar of payout, this game would be tops, easy.
Sheraton Hawaii Bowl Hawaii v. Notre Dame
Do you know what you'll be doing Christmas Eve? I do: I'll be doing whatever it takes to not watch this one, and I suggest you do the same. Unless you want to sit through 3 hours of listening about how Clausen needs another year and how Weis is on the hot seat. Seriously, the bowl schedule just gave you the perfect reason to spend quality time with family on the 24th.
Motor City Bowl Florida Atlantic v. Central Michigan
Honestly, this is a better matchup than it sounds. The problem is that it sounds absolutely horrendous. If you're not too busy putting away the Christmas tree on the 26th, this is here for you. But it's not worth losing any well-deserved tryptophan-induced snooze either.
Meineke Car Care Bowl West Virginia v. North Carolina
It kinda sounds even on the surface, but remember this: West Virginia is a program with very recent success that is possibly staring down a very deep chasm of disappointment in the future, while North Carolina has all the earmarks of a program on the way up - no fear, great coach, improved recruiting, winnable conference, soft in-state competition. It'll be entertaining to watch, but I have a feeling one team is going to look a whole lot better prepared and more engaged than the other.
Champs Sports Bowl Wisconsin v. Florida State
It'll be a decent game because nether team is capable of running away with one, but it won't be a thriller. If it's on and you have time, you'll enjoy it. If not, don't lose sleep over it.
Emerald Bowl Miami (FL) v. California
Two once-proud programs desperate to make their conference appear less hollow than they actually are. California is practically playing a home game, while Miami has one of the longer treks of the season. However, that may mean that Cali is not very interested; their per diem will be scant and they've all been to San Fran before. I would expect Miami to be more excited than Cali, but who know? They're both flaky.
Well, those are my takes. I may be totally out to lunch on a few of them since I didn't look into them, but that feels about right to me. I see about three early games I'm genuinely interested in (EagleBank Bowl, Las Vegas Bowl, Poinsettia Bowl), about four I'm ambivalent toward (New Mexico Bowl, St. Petersburg Bowl, New Orleans Bowl, Motor City Bowl), and one that I will avoid at all costs (Hawaii Bowl). That's actually pretty good for the early bowls.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow, you're way too nice about this.
The Poinsettia’s about the only one worth watching, unless you want to see the crowd freak out at a 6-7 Notre Dame team (really, you can’t pass up a good trainwreck, can you?). I have high hopes that my expectations for the Car Care Bowl will be dashed, and other than that it’s about 20 teams that’d be at home in the ACC, which tells you everything you need to know about how I feel over this slate of games.
Also, Memphis would like to let you know they’re the University of Memphis, not Memphis State University. They put out press releases and everything. Don’t you read everything they say? (No? Well, okay then. Neither do they, since reading’s tough.)
I couldn't resist the MSU barb.
But as for the games I like, remember that I grew up on midmajor football. I appreciate a lot of those games, so long as they’re not totally lopsided or so long as the teams aren’t truly broken. So games like Wake-Navy are interesting to me, and that’s all I really care about in bowl season. Just give me a matchup that will entertain me.
Actually, there is one nice thing about the smaller bowls: you don’t get stuck listening to Danielson an announcer drone on about Tebow one player regardless of what’s actually happening on the field. I’m really beginning to despise listening to the coverage of the marquis games because of that.
by David Hooper on Dec 10, 2008 3:58 PM EST up reply actions
True, but:
While I have no problem with midmajor football, I do have a problem with completely uninteresting slog. That’s why I have no desire to watch Wake Forest ever, and why I’ll spend most of the Champs Sports Bowl wondering why I have nothing better to do with my time. :)
And honestly, you still have that same problem with the smaller bowls, as announcers seize on the one name people might’ve known about before the game started. Don’t believe me? Watch the Motor City Bowl and take a drink every time someone mentions LeFevour (two if he’s not even on the field), and then try posting here.
by Chris Pendley on Dec 10, 2008 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
Fair enough
Fortunately, I don’t have any interest in CMU. :-)
But I do find Wake an entertaining team to watch. Their game against Ole miss earlier this year was a lot of fun. I guess my standards are just different (i.e. lower).
by David Hooper on Dec 10, 2008 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Navy, More fun to watch
I always like watching a well run option attack. But I have to disagree with you on Wake being entertaining. The Wake – Clemson game was probably the worst game I watched all year.
It tied with every other ACC game this season for me.
by Chris Pendley on Dec 10, 2008 8:13 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Well, Wake isn't ALWAYS entertaining.
As I said, I loved that Wake-Ole Miss game. They’ve had a few in the last several years that were gems. You can’t expect Oklahoma-level ball from them, but they can be good.
And yes, they can be quite horrible as well. You nailed it that Navy is the better team to watch in this one, and that can be said even without my Navy time.
by David Hooper on Dec 10, 2008 9:25 PM EST up reply actions

by 
























