Stat comparison: Tennessee Volunteers v. Memphis, I mean, Auburn Tigers
Again with the disclaimers: stats only describe "stuff that has already happened," they don't generally account for the strength of the opponents against which they have been accumulated (hello, MTSU! (yes, that joke's good twice)), and relying on them to predict future results is hazardous to the future of our nation.
All right, now that that's out of the way, let's talk about Vols-Tigers, Saturday night, 9:00 p.m., No. 1 v. No. 2.
Wait. Oh, yeah. Auburn Tigers, I meant. Tomorrow night, 7:30 p.m.
I was really surprised to find that not only are Tennessee and Memphis neck and neck in the rankings, they're also Nos. 1 and 2 in the all-important RPI.
I'm sorry. Auburn. Tomorrow.
Right. So, one ranking that shows a bit of a disparity is strength of schedule: we're No. 2 (woo!); Memphis is No. 28. They get that No. 2 RPI because they haven't lost to anybody yet, but we've played stronger opponents overall.
Sigh. Blue and Orange, not Blue and White. Got it.
Coach Pearl's and Coach Cal's teams are essentially even in field goal percentage and three-point percentage (they're a bit better at twos, we're slightly better at threes), and turnovers are basically even as well. They have slightly better rebounding numbers, and we have slightly better ball control numbers.
Oh, nevermind. I give up. Charts, for the Auburn game, because charts don't lie:
Stats once again courtesy of StatSheet.com.
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Rankings | ||||
| Conf Standing | 1 | 3 | ||
| AP Rank | 4 | 0 | ||
| RPI | 0.6857 | 0.5139 | ||
| RPI Rank | 1 | 149 | ||
| SOS | 0.6056 | 0.508 | ||
| SOS Rank | 2 | 137 | ||
| Wins & Losses | ||||
| Overall | 23-2 | (92.0%) | 13-10 | (56.5%) |
| Home | 13-0 | (100.0%) | 7-5 | (58.3%) |
| Away | 7-1 | (87.5%) | 4-4 | (50.0%) |
| Neutral | 3-1 | (75.0%) | 2-1 | (66.7%) |
| Conference | 10-1 | (90.9%) | 3-7 | (30.0%) |
| Top 25 | 2-1 | (66.7%) | 1-1 | (50.0%) |
| Blowout (> 19) | 8-0 | (100.0%) | 2-3 | (40.0%) |
| Close (< 6) | 6-0 | (100.0%) | 3-2 | (60.0%) |
| Overtime | 0-0 | (0.0%) | 0-0 | (0.0%) |
| NCAA Tourney | 0-0 | (0.0%) | 0-0 | (0.0%) |
Yes, that's a lot of orange.
Um, ditto.
See ya Saturday night. Tomorrow, I mean. Yeah, tomorrow.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Joel! Aerobab! Hooper! Volorado!
Lets go to Memphis!
They have courtside tickets available on StubHub!
We can sit right next to the Big Orange bench!
Check it out and let me know:
http://www.stubhub.com/memphis-tigers-basketball-tickets/?ticket_id=117200196
Joel, I think this would be a great gift to your favorite posters!
Well, since you're offering
;)
by David Hooper on Feb 19, 2008 9:00 AM EST up reply actions
You are absolutely right
Unfortunately, RTT revenue this week is juuuuust a bit short. At the current rate, I could only get one of us a ticket.
In roughly 161 years. Pretty sure the game will be over by then.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Feb 19, 2008 9:07 AM EST up reply actions
Question
Other than that, we love us some orange, don't we? The only thing notable I see is Auburn's improvement in free throws. In all their games, they're 66%. In conference games, they're 72%. Since the conference games are the recent games, that shows a substantial and recent improvement. They probably have a bit more of an edge than 1% on us there.
It's full of stars! ... er ... orange!
I've struggled with that
With such difficulties, I just went with considering it a positive unless DQs become a problem. It really could go either way. What do you think?
by Joel Hollingsworth on Feb 19, 2008 10:00 AM EST up reply actions
Good point.
You'd really have to get involved into the details of the fouls to flesh all that out, and that's way beyond our time to do.
Perhaps a rough metric would work. How about something like fouls per foulout? For example, UT has 502 or 503 fouls on the year. Divide that by 1, and you get 502 or 503. (I don't know the true number because I'm just using your chart rather than trying to look it up.)
Auburn has 374 to 376 fouls total. With 8 foulouts, that gives them 47. So they average 1 foulout every 47 fouls, while UT averages 1 foulout every 500+ fouls. In that sense, even though UT fouls more, they don't lose their players as often. It ignores the other effects of fouls, but would that help?
by David Hooper on Feb 19, 2008 10:26 AM EST up reply actions
I'd be more than happy to go
"ARE YOU SERIOUS?! OH, AMERICA, CHRIS LOFTON'S ON FIRE, BABY! SOMEBODY CALL MR. GORE, I THINK WE FOUND THE REASON FOR GLOBAL WARMING!"
...Yeah
I am fairly sure
Oh c'mon
Plus, YOU GET TO QUOTE HIM IN ALL CAPS, BABY!
Vitale knows his stuff.
But I see the announcers as part of my entertainment, and his voice does not entertain me. It'd be easier for me to watch the game muted. Again, it's nothing personal - his foundation is a great thing, for example. It's just that I really don't care who an announcer is; I care what the announcer says.
by David Hooper on Feb 19, 2008 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
Going to the AUBURN game?
Interested in hitting up the TBA tomorrow night? I've received clearance from The Boss!
That's a definite maybe.
If so, I'll grab a (free) student ticket and try to work my way over to where you're sitting. I'm cheap that way. Also, if it works, I'll email you my phone number (if I haven't already) so we can find each other easily. Somehow, I don't think saying "I'm the guy in orange" will help much.
Cool idea, though.
by David Hooper on Feb 19, 2008 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Now that's a definite definite.
I have a class from 5 to 6:30, so I'll just run over and get my student ticket immediately afterward. When you get to the arena, give me a call and we'll find each other.
I'm assuming there will be a few extra seats here and there so I can leave the student section and find you. It's worked that way for other students pretty consistently.
If anybody else is interested in meeting up, we'll work out a way to coordinate so we can all find each other. Perhaps this could be an impromptu meeting prior to the Orange & White game. It's also a chance to see the #2 Vols in action for the first time in like, ever.
by David Hooper on Feb 19, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
Thinking about it,
Since we're obviously in the 65, now it's a matter of seeding. Dropping to a 2 (or even 3) is not too painful.
It's Tricky
Auburn would scare me if they had any sort of star player or history of success, and were just having a down year a la Kentucky or Florida or LSU. But Auburn is always bad and Sir Charles Barkley isn't coming back anytime soon.
I am concerned about the @Vandy 3 days after the showdown in Memphis. Vandy is great at home and if we have a letdown, they'll pound us.
All that said, I'm pumped for Saturday. All of the pressure is on Memphis. They have the weak conference schedule and these non-conference showdowns are important to them. Plus, they are number 1, at home, and expected to win. If we lose, it doesn't affect anything besides our ranking for the moment. A win, and we're the #1 team in the land. Awesome!

by 
























