Rocky Top Talk: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

5 reasons the Vols look ready to run in 2008

It seems we've been lamenting the demise of the traditional Tennessee running game for years. SMQ observed last year, and again this year, that the Vols appear to have slowly abandoned the running game over the seasons and gotten soft in the process. I theorized that Jimmy Ray Stephens was mostly to blame for the cloud of dust having gone up in smoke. Every year we wonder. Have we recovered? Have we rediscovered ourselves? Can we please, for all that is Good and Orange, open up some holes and run it down their throats?

Perhaps this is the year. The stars appear to be aligning for a return to the days when Tennessee could almost run at will against an opponent. Consider:

1. The Incredible Flipping O-Line. The o-line has been slowed a bit by "the new language of the offense and a little bit of the flipping sides." For those of you who may have been hibernating for the summer, that "flipping" thing is a reference to new offensive coordinator Dave Clawson's retro-innovation of switching out the o-line's guards and tackles depending on the circumstances. Think of the right guard as either a "weak-side" or "strong-side" guard now, as he's going to position himself on either side of the center depending on the play called. The goal is to create mismatches along the line much the same as some plays are designed to create mismatches between skill players and defenders.

That quote above makes it seem like it's not the easiest concept for the players to grab hold of at full speed, at least initially. I'm sure our experienced line will get it eventually, though, and once they do, here's to hoping that The Incredible Flipping O-Line will be even more confusing to defenses and that they won't get their bearings before our game with them is over and in the win column.

2. Josh McNeil, now with extra poundage! McNeil's gained 25 pounds of "good" weight. Of course, he didn't play in the spring, so he's got some catching up to do, but he's solid, smart, and nasty, which is everything you want in an SEC center. He was good before, and now they've gone and rolled out the new and improved version.

3. Miffed. The players are being diplomatic (mostly), but it's apparent that they were not happy last year every time the prior offensive coaching staff called a pass play on third and short. Insulting, say they, and I agree. Let them be angry, and let them deliver hits and make holes rather than just positioning themselves between a defender and the QB. They'll be happier. We'll be happier. Defenders . . . well, won't.

4. Nasty under center, too. Speaking of QBs, our new one has a middle-linebacker mentality. Gone, for now, are the days of counting to three and throwing the ball into the river except when really necessary. Crompton will tuck it, run it, and hit somebody, and there's nothing like that to get the entire team's blood racing. I imagine huddle exchanges will be much different with somebody like that than with Erik Ainge, who, for all of his excellent qualities, obviously viewed getting hit as the Nightmare Scenario.  A tough QB will make an already tough o-line even tougher. Plus, even though Crompton's tough, he's new, and you know what that means: more running plays.

5. The train's a'comin. Arian Foster is a very, very good senior running back, and he'll be running behind a bona fide, devoted-to-blocking fullback behind the experienced offensive line. The void created by Corey Anderson has been filled. Foster looked much better last year once we began to utilize Chris Brown as more of a blocker than receiver. Expect mo better of that this year.

 

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Food for thought

I wonder if flipping the linemen will give any obvious indications as to what plays we run. For instance if Foster is running without a lead blocker hes running behind Anthony Parker, not saying this is necessarily what will happen but I do wonder if the flipping will tip off our plays at all and give the defenses something to look for.

by Getoffmyvols on Jul 22, 2008 2:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good thought

My limited understanding of the concept, though, is that the flipping only further telegraphs which side is strong and which is weak, which the placement of the tight end already does. Knowing which side is strong may give some indication of which way the plays’ being run, but surely an offensive package will have a good deal of weak side plays thrown in to keep the defense honest.

But at this point, we’re all just guessing.

Go Vols!

by Joel on Jul 22, 2008 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A well-designed playbook always has a counterpart play. If there is a tip-off from switching the linemen, then there will be a play or two designed to exploit the defense’s lead from the tip-off. I wouldn’t be surprised (that is, I hope) to see some tendencies develop in the UCLA and UAB games so that we can break Florida’s scouting by some counters. We can probably get through most of the UCLA game without having to roll out the counters (or at least all of them) and we better be able to get through UAB without them.

The interesting thing will be having different people as the blindside tackle. There’ll have to be at least a few Ainge-esque passes from the flipped formation just to keep the defense honest. If both tackles can cover the blindside well enough, I’d love to see a deep pass from the flip – perhaps off a play-action.

by Hooper on Jul 22, 2008 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

6. The Bartholomew torch has been passed

At first I was upset to learn that Ben Bartholomew had not enrolled for the first summer session, until I heard that he’d been working out with his bone-crunching older brother at D-1 Sports. If Ben inherited any of the skill and passion that Will had, then we should be in for a treat for our running game. Ben is bigger and faster than Will, and he says he wants to be a more complete player, catching passes and getting carries. I’ll never forget the block will had against Kentucky that took out three defenders… never seen anything like it before or since.

by marmotman on Jul 22, 2008 5:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ooh, I hope so. I love having a Big Boy in the backfield.

Hey, welcome to RTT, marmotman! Any man that organizes his profile in bullet points is alright by me. Short. Sweet. Spot on.

by Hooper on Jul 22, 2008 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Glad to be part of the fun.

by marmotman on Jul 23, 2008 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick thought, strong thought

Having run both systems in high school, I believe the idea of the quick and strong side is just that. While all our linemen are strong and fast, invariably some are stronger and some are quicker. The advantage lies in being able to establish and move the line of scrimmage with your stronger guard and tackle towards either the short or wide side of the field. This allows for your quicker, off side guard to pull for traps, sweeps, and play-action more effectively. While this does “tip off” the defense somewhat, Joel is absolutely right in that the offense must balance with plays run to the weak side of the field. Counters to the weak side work especially well when the strong side is getting a good push and the defense cheats that way.

All of this points to UT using more “power” blocking schemes and less zone (makes me wanna puke) blocking. The real wild card in all this will be how well Vlad Richard picks up on both guard positions. He’s arguably our most athletic lineman, and having him in the rotation should provide some much-needed rest for our guards, who should be busy burying defensive linemen.

GO VOLS!!!!!

by marmotman on Jul 22, 2008 6:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Great comment, marmotman, and welcome. What’d you play in high school? You certainly know your offensive line.

Go Vols!

by Joel on Jul 22, 2008 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Primarily left guard, but some left tackle and nose tackle on defense.

by marmotman on Jul 23, 2008 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ainge's supposed Nightmare Scenario...

...was exactly that.

He knew that when he gets under too much pressure or is forced to improvise, BAD things happen.

Besides, sacks KILL drives. I don’t have the numbers in front of me. Sacks end drives. Getting hit is NOT good.

It bothers me to no end that UT fans continually berate Ainge for getting rid of the football before getting hit. It might have something to do with toughness, but I guarantee you that it won us games.

by spiritofthehill on Jul 23, 2008 9:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I actually agree with that. That whole four-sacks-in-a-season thing that’s being attributed to the o-line? It’s a combination of the o-line’s protection skills and Ainge’s quick recognition that the play was going nowhere. If that’s the case, and if you can’t run for a few, you best get rid of the ball, and Ainge did that incredibly well. But you can’t get around the fact that Ainge really didn’t want to get hit, either. The fact that throwing the ball away was the right thing to do, though, is also indisputable.

The point I was trying to make was that with Crompton, when the play ends with the QB effectively deciding that no receiver is going to be open on a pass play, Crompton will have two choices where Ainge had only one: Crompton can either throw the ball away or he can run and get a few yards out of nothing. With Ainge, that second option wasn’t an option at all, and that fact isn’t really meant to be a knock on Ainge. It’s just a recognition of his relative strengths and weaknesses. He may eventually be seen as a better pocket passer than Crompton ever will be, but under Crompton, our running game should improve. A few extra yards here and there can really add up.

Go Vols!

by Joel on Jul 23, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do agree that Ainge was afraid of being hit. With good reason, I should add. Notre Dame squished his shoulder. LSU nearly decapitated him. South Carolina and LSU almost ripped his feet from his ankle. Not to mention the fact that he was already hurt the entirety of the 2007 season. One good hit could’ve ended his UT career in a flash.

However, because Crompton is seemingly not afraid to be hit, the third result (besides a throwaway or a scramble/run) comes way more prominently into play:

the SACK.

I don’t know if the few extra rushing yards are worth the killed drives.

If Crompton can be a scrambler, I will enjoy that, because covered receivers eventually break open when the QB can buy them an extra second or two.

by spiritofthehill on Jul 23, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is almost certain that Crompton will get sacked more often than Ainge did last year, probably significantly more. But I think an extra few yards here and there extend drives as much as a sack kills one. So the question is whether there will be more sacks or more positive scrambles. Can we agree is crossing our fingers for more scrambles and fewer sacks? ;-)

Go Vols!

by Joel on Jul 23, 2008 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d simply be happy to see defenses having to cover more than the first 10 yards beyond the line of scrimmage, for a change.

But with regards to the uptick in sacks, its effect is not an easy thing to quantify. We gave up a lot of drives in the process of not giving up sacks last year because the defense knew that the play was either a run or a quick pass. That’s something I think figured into the Alabama game, and in the Spurrier and Kentucky second-half comebacks. Additionally, we didn’t really have an offensive scheme to come from behind. Back in the Spurrier game, we got that OT-forcing field goal because of a great return and a fortuitous fumble, but not because of our 4th quarter offense.

I get the feeling that Clawson is planning on having a more robust running game that will wear down defenses. If we then need to come from behind late in the game, the pass rush should be slower and Crompton should have more time to make something happen – either by feet or by pass.

The sack risk is obviously there, as is the injury risk. But if we can keep a 1-sack-per-game average (or thereabouts), we will probably find several drives per game that are extended at the cost of one blunted drive.

by Hooper on Jul 23, 2008 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Tennessee Volunteers.
Start posting about the Volunteers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Checkerboard_enzone_small
Ok, Enough Is Enough....

Recent FanPosts

Checkerboard_enzone_small
Lil' Wayne's Latest Shout-Out to Lane Kiffin and the Vols
111007_1336a_small
Back in Knoxville
Small
Why do opposing kickers never miss against Tennessee????
Small
Of ESPN and Pat Forde
Small
Stickin' it to Spurrier
Fiddler_on_the_roof_fiddler_1__small
RTT Pick 'Em: Vol in Mississippi has good week, marmot_man_111 extends lead
Fiddler_on_the_roof_fiddler_1__small
RTT Guessing Game standings after Week 8
Small
SEC Red Zone Comparisons & Projections
Phil_s_pic_small
Guys need your prays and hope !
Checkerboard_enzone_small
Is Saban Gonna Jump At The Cash....Again???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Video Highlights

Animated Drive Charts

Animated BlogPoll

RTT Classics

RTT Classics 2008 Animated BlogPoll2007 Animated BlogPollLOL! Your logo is so scary! Welcome to Rocky Top Talk Tradition! Fiddlin' on the Roof2008 Animated BlogPoll The Season of Which We Do Not Speak Pearlfection Case Study: 2QB Systems and the 2005 Tennessee Volunteers The 2007 College Football Blogger Awards The 2006 College Football Blogger Awards The 20 coolest college football logos The 10 worst college football logos The 29 most boring college football logos 2006 Animated BCS Race 2005 Animated Race to the Rose Bowl

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Chris's drug test had revealed evidence of human chorionic gonadotropin,...

Recent FanShots

"I did see the rerun," Kiffin said. "It was pretty bad but we'll worry...
Twitter / Luke Stocker: Sporting my Uggs all day, ...
Just a fun little graphic I created to celebrate the Vols outstanding defensive playing!
Meyer: Tebow hit late vs. Georgia
May cause spontaneous tackling
Nuke Doesn't Launch
Don't know if anyone knows this guy but I ran into him a couple of weeks ago and he was highly...
As Hooper mentioned, none of the RTT uniform design entries went with the black shirts and orange pants, like we saw against that team coached by Spurrier this past weekend.

So I gave it a very quick stab.  One thing I couldn't figure out in the short amount of time I took to do this was how to get the "T" on the helmet when designing your own helmet.  Others had done it in the contest...I couldn't figure it out.
Football, dogfighting, and brain damage : The New Yorker
Frazier Done for the Year

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

YouTube


Editor-in-Chief

Fiddler_on_the_roof_fiddler_1__small Joel

Senior Editor

Gromit_small Hooper

Tennessee_logo_small Will

Official Partner of CBS Sports