Tennessee Volunteers v. Florida Gators: game preview
There are essentially three keys for home-dog Tennessee this Saturday against the Gators:
- Control the A and B gaps on both offense and defense.
- Win on third down defense.
- New standard for punters: forget on-time, high, and deep. Go with early and out-of-bounds.
First, the pertinent stats:

|
Tennessee rush
v. Florida defense |
Tennessee pass
v. Florida defense |
Florida rush
v. Tennessee defense |
Florida pass
v. Tennessee defense |
|
20
|
52
|
20
|
12
|
|
13
|
4
|
44
|
74
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Field Goals
|
Tennessee punting
v. Florida punt return |
Florida punting
v. Tennessee punt return |
Intangibles
|
|
T-85
|
118
|
37
|
|
|
T-85
|
14
|
21
|
|
|
Push
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Strength of schedule metrics:
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
|
Can somebody explain the NCAA's strength of schedule pdf to me? Maybe it's just a mistake, but they have Tennessee's past opposition strength of schedule calculated as, well, zero, based on prior opponent's non-Tennessee games record of no wins and three losses. As much as that pains me, that appears to be correct, but they have Florida's calculated as zero as well, listing their prior opponent's non-Florida games record of zero wins and one loss. That has to be a data entry error, don't you think?
Here's how the teams look next to each other in each of the key statistical categories currently used in the RTT Ready, Fire, Aim BlogPoll Computer Ballot:
|
Rank
|
Team
|
WL
|
SOS
|
PED
|
RD
|
3DO
|
TD
|
PEO
|
EXP
|
OPPG
|
TO
|
3DD
|
AVG R
|
W AVG
|
|
17
|
Florida | 1 | 99 | 4 | 13 | 19 | 3 | 34 | 116 | 6 | 62 | 15 | 33.82 | 191.09 |
|
70
|
Tennessee | 65 | 99 | 12 | 20 | 61 | 30 | 96 | 116 | 27 | 23 | 68 | 56.09 | 450.36 |
It appears that Florida should have been ranked even higher than they were this week by the computer based on that wacky SOS data discussed above. Correcting for that puts them at third rather than 17th. Sigh.
So what's it all mean?
The bulk of the struggle in this game is going to focus on the A and B gaps in both lines. Those are the holes on either side of the center on the offensive line. As we've been saying all week (and for years), Tennessee's best chance against the Gators is to run the ball. If successful, they can then use the play-action pass, but if they aren't successful at running the ball, they'll give Florida another chance to run up the score because they won't be able to control possession on offense. The only possibly viable alternative to establishing the run and sticking with it is to use a short-yardage passing game. Despite all of that, the Vols will need to take a shot down the field once in awhile at opportune times to keep the defense honest. If they can hit one or two of those, it will help the running game a great deal and get us on the road to a possible upset. If not (and see the No. 54 Tennessee pass rank against the No. 4 Florida pass efficiency defense rank), it will just be viewed as an empty threat and will make matters worse. Tennessee's running game is good (or it appears to be good -- see the strength of schedule), but Florida's rush defense appears to actually have the edge. Still, it's our only hope Obi-Wan.
Really surprising to me here is that the numbers indicate a possible advantage for the Vols on defense. The knee-jerk skepticism is somewhat quelled by the fact that although UAB's defense was really bad, its offense really isn't. When we're on defense, look for two things: watch the A and B gaps, and watch our defense's ability to stop Florida on third down (Note Florida's third down offense rank of 19 against Tennessee's third down defense rank of 68.). Can Demonte' Bolden, Dan Williams, Walter Fisher, and Donald Langley dictate matters in Florida's backfield like Miami did? Will Chavis play the linebackers up at the line in different gaps at different times to give Tebow and the o-line and the blockers and options more to process and to disrupt the play at the outset? Will that increase the odds that any of Tebow's passes might be off target and result in interceptions from our ball-hawking secondary? It's possible. Defense is that one area where the home crowd can really help the team. It's been a long time since Tennessee's fielded an intimidating, dominating defense, and the early returns this year are encouraging. Al Wilson will be in attendance to be honored as the Tennessee Legend of the game, and it is probably safe to assume that coach Fulmer will have him address the team to get them fired up. If Vol fans see glimpses of the Tennessee defense of yore, they'll go nuts.
The real danger comes on special teams, specifically Tennessee's punting game. With Florida's Brandon James fielding punts, Tennessee's fourth-down territory should be expanded. If a punt is definitely called for, Chad Cunningham does not need to be a Colquitt, he just needs to be a mere pawn in the scheme, helping his team take one small step in the right direction. He does not need to get the punt out on time, high, and deep. He needs to get it out early and out of bounds. A thirty-eight yard gross average is not the standard here. Avoiding a special teams touchdown for the other team is the only goal. A ten-yard punt that is not returned may be the best play of the night that we'll never acknowledge simply because it precluded something bad from happening.
Comments
Brandon James
Dude’s a monster, all right, but you’re really willing to cede field position every time just to avoid kicking to him? I would think that if you give Florida the ball near mid-field on every possession you’re probably giving up at least two scores based on field position alone. It doesn’t seem worth it — be disciplined on special teams and kick it deep!
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
by Gatorpilot on
Sep 19, 2008 8:03 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No
I’m willing to cede 20 yards. We don’t need to maximize the punt. I’d much rather have a twenty yard punt that’s not returned than several 40 yard punts with one of them returned for a TD. Nothing takes the wind out of the sails faster than a special teams TD. That would be even more so this week for the Vols based on it happening so much recently to the Vols, including twice against James (last year and the prior year, which was called back.)
Go Vols!
by Joel on
Sep 19, 2008 8:59 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Strength of Schedule
The strength of schedule calculates opponent’s wins and losses by removing the team in question (as you noted) and also by removing 1-AA teams. For Tennessee, UCLA lost to BYU while UAB lost to Tulsa and FAU – both 1-A teams. Florida played Miami, who lost to Florida (doesn’t factor in) and beat Charleston Southern (1-AA), while Hawaii played Weber State (1-AA) and lost to Oregon State. So for both of Florida’s opponents, they have only played one non-Florida Div. 1-A game – Hawaii’s loss to Oreg. State. That’s where the 0-1 comes from.
by hooper on
Sep 19, 2008 8:33 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I am concerned about the Line Backing responsibilities
UCLA and UAB (to a lesser extent) took advantage of the area where line backers roam. Passes of 5 – 15 yards to TE’s and WR’s between the hash marks killed UT against UCLA.
I hope that Chavis will use a 3-4 defense and commit one of those line backers to guarding or spying the area 5 yards behind the defensive line. Florida’s offense is built (especially with Tebow as QB) to be fluid and porous. What that means is, they will let UT’s Def. line through and dump 5 – 10 yard passes in areas where UT’s defense isn’t.
Just as water moves around obstacles, UF’s offense most likely will do the same. They will avoid UT’s strenghts. One being an aggressive front and two letting their play makers take advantage of mediocre tackling in the secondary.
I’ll be missing the game because of work. Good luck UT and VOL fans alike.
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on
Sep 19, 2008 11:53 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I understand where you're coming from with the 3-4.
Unfortunately, I do not see any way for UT to switch to it as the base defense. We don’t really have anybody trained up as a nose tackle, and I don’t think that shifting one of our DTs over the center would work consistently. I wouldn’t mind seeing some zone blitzing, which could achieve a similar effect of widening the line without dropping below 3 in the linebacker coverage region. Not that Chavis would do either, but I can dream too.
by hooper on
Sep 19, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe in our defense. They will put some early licks on Tebow and contain the gators to 21-24 points. The offense 1) Must not turn the ball over, and 2) Must keep our punter off the field. If Tennessee can move the chains (18 first downs?), we will win.
Final Tennessee 30, Florida 24
Vinnie Testaverde is always remembered for Tennessee kicking his ass.
by RevOrange on
Sep 19, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If they ignore the instructions coming in from the sidelines we should be alright.
Once Chavis starts choking (aka when UT gets the lead) they need to ignore him and just play ball.
by wvvol on
Sep 19, 2008 5:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"aka when UT gets the lead"
Funny… I didn’t realize that a 0-0 score at the opening kickoff constituted a UT lead…
by hooper on
Sep 19, 2008 5:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
read the post, then laughed
why is it that my good ol buddy “wvvol” always gets me to laugh?
see ya on saturday!
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on
Sep 19, 2008 7:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well...
it’s not NOT a lead.
whoshotwhointhewhatnow?
by thetennesseethumper on
Sep 19, 2008 6:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs














