Gonzaga 89 Tennessee 79: Experience > Home Court
I'm sure there are lots of things that both teams wish could've gone better for them inside Thompson-Boling Arena tonight in what still amounted to an incredibly dramatic basketball game...in regulation.
But in overtime, Gonzaga's veteran players did everything right, and Tennessee's mix of experience and youth combined to shoot 2 for 11 and never really give themselves a chance in the final five.
The Vols could've put the hammer down with a 14 point first half lead. Gonzaga could've made any one of the eleven free throws they missed in regulation. And the Vols could've made any one of the point blank looks or inside shots that mistook the home rims for somewhere else. There are a myriad of other breaks and reasons in the game for both teams.
You could almost sense it at times inside the arena, that this was the night the winning streak was coming to an end. When Cameron Tatum stopped getting looks, when inside shots kept not falling...when the home crowd was loud but not quite as loud, in my opinion, as they have been in years past, or at least not with the same consistency...
(which is easy to explain: now we know we're good, whereas the first two years produced that "ohmygodohmygodicantbelievethisohmygod" level of stupified noise, and last year it hit a crescendo with a team that reached #1...now there's no surprise and less sense of urgency, and you could tell Chism was getting maybe a tad frustrated by it as he relentlessly instructed the orange faithful to get on their feet)
Even when they used the 1-2 combo of a Dane Bradshaw video followed immediately by a live shot of Bradshaw in attendance, who then by his Tebowesque presence alone caused Gonzaga to throw that inbounds pass away at the end of regulation from his front row seat...
And even when Tyler Smith, the best player on the team and the guy who probably should be taking the last shot, put one in that really had no business going there, especially given our luck with the rims all night...
Despite Tatum's career night and Wayne "play to the occasion" Chism's 15 points and 19 man-sized rebounds...
In overtime the Vols missed nine shots. Gonzaga, after struggling there all night, missed one free throw...and made everything else. Literally.
Along the way, the Vols allowed another guard to post a career night (Matt Bouldin with 26 points), and while Gonzaga stayed poised and got the win their season desperately needed, the Vols rushed on their end with poor shot selection, a deadly combination against a team like the Bulldogs.
Tennessee lost because they shot 36% from the field and allowed Gonzaga to shoot 53%. The Zags' experience and the Vols' youth helped produce both numbers. And on this night, experience was just enough to take the nation's second longest home winning streak to overtime, and then put her to bed.
I'll say this though - anyone who says this Tennessee team has "no heart" needs to find better vocabulary to articulate what they're actually trying to say. They're young at spots, yes. They have defensive lapses which could lead one to say "no discipline" at times, yes. Several of them take bad shots.
But we should also all understand that the thirteen games we've seen thus far have also been about getting us ready for the next sixteen (plus Memphis). The Vols are learning and they learned more tonight in a continuing exercise in frustrating shot selection and defensive struggles.
But they are learning. And as close as they were tonight, and as much as it hurts to lose the home court winning streak....if they learn enough to carry it forward to conference play, and turn a close loss to a talented, veteran team into wins against younger and weaker SEC competition...
Then they'll have done their job.
Comments
This was a huge hump game for both teams but I think especially for Gonzaga. UT can still prove itself in SEC play but the zags had to put another quality win under its belt before entering the weak WCC. I agree that it was a great game until GU took over in OT. I think that the youth of tenn will be worked out and this team will definitely be a factor come tourney time. good luck and thanks for the good post.
by middleofthekennel on
Jan 8, 2009 1:46 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
Good game, guys. Y’all have a really good team despite the recent struggles.
Great post, Will. I wonder just how frustrating it is for a veteran to see a once-frenzied fanbase start down the apathy slide. Especially for a young team, I’d think, it’s really important for the crowd to get into it. From the t.v., it looked like they played much more aggressively (both offensively and defensively), and better, when the crowd was roaring. The t.v. shot after showing Bradford up and imploring the crowd to stand and get loud was a shot of several lower-level, middle agers leaning back in their chairs.
It’s too bad, but it seems like it’s a one way street: the team must play well for the crowd to cheer. Or at the least, it’s a symbiotic relationship that has to begin with good play. It could start with the fans, but it just doesn’t look like it’s going to. Maybe Pearl needs to go stand on a few lunch tables at office buildings around town.
Go Vols!
by Joel on
Jan 8, 2009 6:57 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Psst. "Bradshaw"
The lack of defense is what I can’t understand. And not just from the new guys either. Maybe I’m “mis-remembering” last year’s team defense though. I don’t know what to think.
by wvvol on
Jan 8, 2009 8:36 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Last year's defense:
Last year, the team really had that full-court press thing down to an artform. If a team could break that, the half-court defense really struggled (remember Kentucky at home? all those last-second shots?). With the better shooting that we had last, year, much of the season was attributable to basically going 1-for-1 with the half-court possessions, then sneaking in a few full-court steals for some extra points.
by hooper on
Jan 8, 2009 10:56 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We're still scoring a lot of points
so the poor shooting hasn’t hurt that much. We just can’t keep the other team from scoring more.
by wvvol on
Jan 8, 2009 10:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good writeup
Defensively, I think your words sum it up: “less sense of urgency.” We are capable defensively, as we’ve seen it on lots of possessions, especially after made baskets. But we don’t play with that sense of urgency very much and I think that causes a lot of our problems. That’s one difference between this team and prior teams.
Offensively, we just need to spend about two weeks in the gym taking contested shots in the lane and open shots from three. We can’t hit either right now. It’s horribly frustrating to watch a team so capable of scoring miss such easy looks repeatedly.
by thebruceballblog on
Jan 8, 2009 9:44 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Bingo!
You hit the nail on the head. I think part of the problem is that for the last few years with Chris and JuJuan on the floor, we didn’t have to worry about playing defense because we could usually just ‘outscore’ the other team. You know, the “you put up a bucket from the lane…we’ll drop one from behind the arc” mentality. Understandably, that mindset still seems to exist; however, we just don’t have the shooters/scorers of days old.
by Aerobab on
Jan 8, 2009 9:56 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep
And what’s up with the offensive scheme? Don’t I remember Jimmy Dykes always going on and on about our, what did he call it, flex offense or something while scribbling lines along the baseline on the teleprompter? Did I make that up? I see very little motion in the half court offense now. Three guys on the perimeter passing it back and forth. I really don’t know what the flex offense is or whether we’re not running it this season, but if not, why the change?
Go Vols!
by Joel on
Jan 8, 2009 10:03 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
There does not seem to be much of an offense being run. It just looks like a poorly-executed middle school motion offense. They run 20-25 seconds off the shot clock passing it around the perimeter before someone has to rush an ill-advised shot.
And this team doesn’t have anyone who can knock down threes reliably, so the “keep passing it around until someone gets a good look behind the arc” offense doesn’t work as well as it did last year.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
by birdjam on
Jan 8, 2009 10:26 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2-3 zone
When the opposition gets in that, and out shooters on the perimeter are Tatum, Maze and Prince, we simply can’t shoot over it at any significant percentage. That, to me, is our best lineup (with Chism and Tyler inside), but there’s only one shooter in it. That worked well when Cameron was lighting it up in the first half, but after he hit that initial three to start the second, the team went 0-for-13 from there on out behind the arc, and Tatum was only responsible for three of those.
I think it reached the point where Chism and Tyler just decided they were going up against it…the shots just didn’t fall. Maze got some penetration against it and then kicked to Prince, but he couldn’t get anything to fall coming in off the baseline either. And then the threes on the game’s most critical possessions were taken by Chism and Maze in regulation,and Tyler Smith and the wide open JP Prince in overtime.
Maybe you put Hopson and Tatum on the floor together, I dunno. But otherwise, bruceballblog up there is right – we need to practice those inside contact five footers and get better at doing that to make teams pay.
by wshelton2 on
Jan 8, 2009 11:15 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
True
When you can’t hit layups, you’re not beating Gonzaga anyway.
And what’s with Prince’s pathological fear of dunking? Is his shoulder still giving him problems? He seems to go strong to the hole and you get excited about a throwdown, only to have him miss a layup Torey-Harris-style.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
by birdjam on
Jan 9, 2009 9:00 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think it is urgency
I simply think that this team does not know how to play zone defense. They just don’t know how it works apparently. I can’t even count the number of times I’ve seen guys cut to the basket, receive pass, and make uncontested layup, dunk, alley-oop. Its happened a lot. The players simply don’t know where they are supposed to be on defense. They are confused. I love BP, but that is a coaching issue.
As an aside, can someone please give JP Prince the red light if he is anywhere outside of 5ft of the basket.
by kidbourbon on
Jan 8, 2009 10:18 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tyler Smith injury
They never showed a replay on the JumboTron – did he just hit the knee or something? His quick return made me think it was just a bruise-type injury and not a twist or serious problem.
And what was Mark Few going on about while they were attending to Tyler? The crowd was going nuts about it and booing him but by the time I realized what was going on, Few had gone back to the bench. Can anyone tell me what all that was about?
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
by birdjam on
Jan 8, 2009 10:17 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don’t know about Few.
On Smith, a defender fell back into his leg, both trapping his foot and running into the knee. So hyperextended is my best guess. Looked painful.
Go Vols!
by Joel on
Jan 8, 2009 10:33 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you watch it on TV?
I’m guessing that when Tyler went down, ESPN2 went to commercial. But while they were attending to Tyler, the crowd (especially the student section) started going nuts and booing before breaking into an “A**HOLE! A**HOLE!” chant at Few, who was arguing something with the officials. I couldn’t tell what Few was upset about and haven’t seen any mention of the incident in any of the post-game write-ups.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
by birdjam on
Jan 8, 2009 10:43 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Memory foggy
I saw it on t.v. I don’t recall them cutting to commercial. I heard the chant, and I remember seeing a quick few of Few being animated about something. That is all I know.
Anyone else?
Go Vols!
by Joel on
Jan 8, 2009 10:48 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Some of it was Heytvelt too
When there was light booing of Few, Heytvelt raised his hands over his head and started clapping, which sparked the louder stuff…he did it again when Few got a little more animated. I’m sure Few had a point but I don’t know what it was, and the Heytvelt thing made him come off like a jerk.
by wshelton2 on
Jan 8, 2009 11:18 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe “no heart” is a stretch. But I find myself using the following words watching them blow huge leads and self-destruct. Whiny. Lazy. Selfish. Moody. Undisciplined. Stupid.
It could be a long year. Remeber, the 2005 football team started ranked #3.
I hope they grow up, but there has been 0 evidence of any leadership so far.
"I will drink my all for Tennessee today"
by TheGoldfishCowboy on
Jan 8, 2009 11:21 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Whiny is right
This team, Prince I have noticed in particular, spends an awful lot of time complaining to refs about calls or non-calls when they should be playing basketball.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
by birdjam on
Jan 9, 2009 9:01 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This is cool...
…I agree with what almost everyone has said…last post is the exception. That’s unusual on most of the boards I post on, believe me. Patience is a virtue; Bruce should earn a few stars in his crown this season, but I think it will pay off in the end. Go Vols!
by sddbaker on
Jan 8, 2009 11:23 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs













