First Priorities: The Tennessee Volunteers Offense vs. the Georgia Bulldogs Defense
Quick: What is the significance of 40% in offense in football?
While you're thinking about that one (if you don't already have the answer), here are some other percentages directly relating to 40% and the Tennessee Volunteers offense versus the Georgia Bulldogs defense:
- 55.9%
- 32.3%
- 58.8% / 35.3%
- 5.9%
Ok, the answer: 40% refers to the offensive "schedule" on first down. That is, what percentage of yards to the next first down does the offense actually gain on first? Most seem to agree that, on 1st and 10, a team remains 'on schedule' for the next first down if they gain four yards. If they are penalized and start at 1st and 15, then 6 yards is usually the hope. But for general principle, 40% on first is the goal (and 60% of whatever is remaining on second).
The remaining percentages relate directly to Tennessee on first downs throughout the game and various ways of measuring success. More on that and all of the first down plays after the jump.
The chart (below) shows all of the first downs for Tennessee in the game (34 in all). They're organized in order in a way that shows how many first downs were in each drive, what type of play transpired, and the result. The "Yards" are highlighted according to "schedule" - if the Vols managed to gain 40% of the yards for the next first down (or touchdown), the number is highlighted in green. If they failed to gain yards at all, it's highlighted in red. Also, the one time that an incompletion was thrown on first is highlighted in yellow. (Yes, one incompletion on first out of twelve pass attempts.)
After the chart, I'll go back over those percentages I listed earlier, as well as a few more enjoyable tidbits.
| Drive | 1st down # | Type | Yards | Notes |
| 1 | 1 | pass | 18 | |
| 1 | 2 | pass | 23 | |
| 1 | 3 | rush | 7 | |
| 2 | 1 | rush | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | rush | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | pass | 13 | |
| 3 | 2 | penalty | -5 | |
| 3 | 3 | rush | 10 | |
| 3 | 4 | rush | 9 | |
| 3 | 5 | rush | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | pass | 0 | 1st and Goal, 6 yards to go |
| 4 | 1 | rush | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | pass | 33 | TD |
| 5 | 1 | pass | 15 | |
| 5 | 2 | rush | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | pass | 14 | |
| 5 | 4 | pass | 5 | 1st and Goal, TD |
| 6 | 1 | rush | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | rush | 15 | |
| 7 | 2 | rush | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | rush | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | rush | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | pass | 18 | |
| 9 | 3 | rush | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | rush | 2 | |
| 10 | 2 | pass | 51 | TD |
| 11 | 1 | rush | 3 | |
| 11 | 2 | penalty | -5 | |
| 11 | 3 | rush | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | penalty | 12 | |
| 12 | 2 | pass | 1 | 1st and Goal, 2 yards to go |
| 12 | 3 | rush | 1 | TD |
| 13 | 1 | rush | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | rush | 5 |
As you can see, the Volunteers did themselves a huge favor by succeeding on first down. By staying on schedule, which normally leaves you in second and 6 or fewer situations, the playbook remained wide open and the Vols were nearly unstoppable for most of the game. Georgia was not able to hedge their bets on pass defense, and successful first downs almost always resulted achieving another first down or a score. In the drives that didn't stay on schedule on first downs, the Vols often punted.
Numbers. Happy, Tasty Numbers
- 55.9% The success rate on first down.
- 32.3% The rate at which a first down play resulted in another first down.
- 58.8% / 35.3% The rush / pass ratio. (The remainder is due to two penalties.)
- 5.9% The penalty rate on first down.
- 4 / 11.76% The number of 3-yard gains on 1st and 10. If you consider those successes as well, then the success rate becomes 67.7%.
- 8.05, 5, 4.93 The average yards, median yards, and trimmed average yards gained on first down. (Trimmed average means I removed the top 20% and bottom 20% and averaged the rest.)
- 14.7, 12.5, 11.9 The average yards, median yards, and trimmed average yards gained on a successful first down. Note that successful firsts were most likely to result directly in another first down.
- 274 The total yards gained on first down. That's 58% of their total 472 yards on the day.
Again, if you're looking for key elements to success for the Vols offense, one of the biggest was that they set themselves up nicely after first down. Either they had another first, a touchdown, or a manageable second down in a decided majority of their plays, which kept the Bulldogs defense on their heels and avoided must-pass situations.
If that's what Lane Kiffin has in mind for the offense (even if it was a 'bad' offense against a 'bad' defense), I'm all aboard.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
*"274 The total yards gained on first down. That's 58% of their total 472 yards on the day."*
That percentage is amazing. In order to achieve yardage like that on first down, the offense must keep the defense guessing as to the nature of the next play.
Kiffin has a plan for this team. That plan involves sticking with Crompton and maybe, just maybe, there is some type of chemistry developing.
It also helps when you have #2 to hand the ball to. Monterio has such a good combo of bruising and speed running skills.
Ball, oskie, cover, block, cut and slice, pursue and gang tackle... for this is the WINNING EDGE.
by pound the rock on Oct 14, 2009 11:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well did ya know
That 90 percent of the people at Neyland had on Orange and 9 percent had on red and the remaning 1 percent was a mix. Now IF 50% of the orange got a hot dog and 30% of the red got a coke what percent got popcorn ?
And just to let you know 90% of percentages are made up on the spot 20% time. ; ) Good stuff Hoop !
Phil,GO VOLS !!!
by bulldurham on Oct 14, 2009 12:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not really sure where to post this good news for poundtherock
Here’s my exchange with TKK:
Reading through the strand a couple of days after the emotional game
We can discuss whether South Carolina and Ole Miss are "quality opponents", but Tennessee still has a shot at 8-4. Before you dismiss that as delusional, look at the remaining games…
Bama will almost certainly beat Tennessee. But, Ole Miss looked beatable as Snead looks more and more like Crompton as the season rolls on. If Crompton places his passes the way he did against GA (i.e. on target, instead of behind WR’s) then TN can beat Ole Miss because of our defense. South Carolina is not a scary good 5-1 team and they were a missed 2 pt conversion from OT at Kentucky. Plus, we’ve already agreed Memphis, Vandy and Kentucky are winnable. That means, we end up between 6-6 and 8-4.
By the way, you and Lane Kiffin agree on something;
Tennessee is not good yet and we have a long way to go.
Sadly, 3-3 is progress. While we are not satisfied, Tennessee is headed in the right direction (comparing this year vs last).
As for Martinez, he should have been surprised that UT passed like that. I mean, what in our prior body of work would lead you to believe Crompton could do that (besides WKU)?! Where he should be pilloried is the failure to adapt to the roll-out strategy.
You run a great blog, sir, and I have enjoyed being able to comment here with respectful dialogue back and forth. As much as poundtherock should have been more sensitive with his strident tone as a guest on your site in the aftermath of a disappointing loss for your side, it’s understandable that we would react strongly when you say that our team sucks while giving us limited credit for finally playing well (aside from miserable special teams). I hope you reconsider the ban.
by memphispete on Oct 12, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You make a fair point in a reasonable manner, memphispete . . .
. . . as a result of which, you may inform poundtherock that the ban has been lifted.
It’s been a pleasure doing business with you.
Go ’Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Oct 12, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
by memphispete on Oct 14, 2009 1:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Diplomacy is the greatest show of Valor !!!
Well played sir !
Phil,GO VOLS !!!
by bulldurham on Oct 14, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
diplomacy?
what?
;-)
I told you we would beat Georgia!! Now, as for those 9 wins in '09......
I got bored and made a blog!! SCS
by VolBrian on Oct 14, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

I got punk'd by UT's Athletic Department.
by bobo_the_vol on Oct 14, 2009 6:21 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 

















