Tennessee Volunteers Let One Slip to Auburn Tigers, Lose 26-22
In one of the most beautiful nights to have a football game, the Tennessee Volunteers fell to the Auburn Tigers despite holding the Tigers to their lowest point total of the season. And for all the anticipation of the Monte Kiffin / Gus Malzahn matchup, the real story of the night belonged on the other side of the ball, where the Volunteers spotted the Tigers nearly an entire half through a series of offense-killing mistakes.
In the first quarter, Tennessee found their biggest play of the game early - a 41 yard rush by Nu'Keese Richardson out of the Wild-whatever formation that brought the Volunteers within field goal range on the first play of the game. Unfortunately, after gaining only two more yards, that field goal range failed to net any points as place kicker Daniel Lincoln missed wide right. The Volunteers defense held serve on the first possession by the Auburn offense, aided by a chop block call that negated a potential first down for the Tigers and eventually led them to punt. And after the touchback, things really went strange for the Volunteers.
A three-and-out forced the Vols to punt back to the Tigers, whose offense was able to come within field goal range and open the scoring for the night, 3-0. After the ensuing kickoff, the Volunteer offense quickly abandoned the field as Jonathon Crompton mishandled the snap and the Tigers recovered with a short field. Held to only 4 yards, the Tigers then settled for a second field goal to extend the early lead to 6-0. From there, the first half ended with a UT 3-and-out, and Auburn 3-and-out, and another UT 3-and-out.
For all of the anticipation of the Auburn offense vs. the Tennessee defense, the clear story of the first quarter was Crompton, who was responsible for the lone turnover of the game and whose inaccurate passing left the Volunteers with only one first down in the entire quarter - that first run by Nu'Keese Richardson. The wildly erratic passing thwarted any attempts at a balanced game and resulted in several long 3rd down attempts - all of which ended with more sketchy passes. But the score was still 6-0 at this point.
In the second quarter, the Tigers eventually gained a 13-0 lead after an 87 yard drive ended in an 11-yard touchdown run by Ben Tate. The Tennessee offense was absolutely stonewalled again in the second half - by the passing game - although the culprit was slightly different: this time, Crompton was finally getting the balls to the receivers but the receivers were dropping balls with both hands. Perhaps the archetypical moment came when Quintin Hancock, on a slant route, failed to prepare for the pass and received the ball straight into his face mask.
But as bad as it looked for the Volunteers through the rest of the half, the defense held firm and kept the Tigers from scoring when their place kicker Wes Byrum missed a 46-yard field goal attempt. At long last, with only a minute and a half left in the first half, the Volunteers put together a 70-yard touchdown drive, culminating in a 1-yard Montario Hardesty rush into the checkerboards. The extra point attempt was blocked, and the halftime score read 13-6 in favor of the Tigers.
And those four missed points (the extra point attempt and Lincoln's earlier missed field goal attempt) would turn out to haunt the Volunteers.
In the second half, the two teams traded 3-and-outs again. The Tigers, behind consecutive 32-yard and 15-yard rushes, closed to first and goal range on their second possession but had to settle for a field goal to lead 16-6. The scoring in the third quarter ended there, as neither team could gain any traction: Auburn's offense was being held in check by Tennessee's defense, and Tennessee's offense was still trying to find their rhythm. But in a drive the stretched over the quarter break, Auburn finally hit paydirt and scored another touchdown on a Chris Todd pass to Terrell Zachery to lead 23-6.
And, finally, the Tennessee offense decided to join the game. In a five-pass, two-rush drive, the Volunteers responded with their own touchdown on a 31-yard touchdown reception by Hardesty, which featured some of the niftiest running of the game as Hardesty fought off and eluded defenders for almost all of the 31 yards. After a hard-fought three-and-out forced by a tired Tennessee defense, the offense again answer the call, assembling an 18 play, 72 yard field goal drive that put the game back within reach at 23-16. But the effort put forth by the defense finally caught up to them; the Tigers answered with a field goal of their own after a 52-yard kick return gave them a short field. With only 39 seconds left on the clock, the Volunteers again found a way to the end zone, scoring 6 more points on the final play of the game. (The extra point was not tried as it would not have affected the outcome.)
Final score: 26-22. Four points - same as the number of missed points in the first half. That is most certainly not to say that the kicking game was to blame for the loss, as the ineptitude of the offense in the first half brought far more harm to Tennessee's hopes of winning. However, it does point out that, despite not playing offense for an entire half, the Volunteers were well within range of potentially winning the game late. For all of the negatives that come from the loss, there is much to be pleased with as well.
Notes: Auburn was 6-17 on third downs; Tennessee was 4-17 on third and 3-3 on 4th. The Tigers ran 83 plays to the Volunteer's 73, resulting in a total of 459 Auburn yards and 410 Tennessee yards of offense. Tennessee had their most penalty-laden game of the years: 4 for 30 yards. Jonathan Crompton's 20/43 for 259 yards and 2 touchdown night was good enough for a QB rating of 112 - very near his career average. Tennessee gained 213 of their 410 yards in the fourth quarter in 2-minute offense.
Did I mention it was a beautiful night outside?
55 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Crowd was awesome.
They were behind the team all the way. When the crowd would start to flag, all the defense had to do was wave their arms in the air and the crowd would come right back to life.
Crompton/offense did get booed in the first hald when things fell so spectacularly badly.
by David Hooper on Oct 4, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
The crowd roared at the funeral
That offense was so incredibly bad. Crompton threw behind receivers on almost every pass play that didn’t take place in the two minute offense. The receivers could not adjust to balls thrown behind but that couldn’t excuse the outright drops. My favorite was the Quentin Hancock earhole pass.
Hardesty’s knee is in bad shape. He had a couple of runs that would have been TD-breakaways and he was caught.
Even the defense seemed a step slow. How do you miss some of the tackles we missed?
I confess to being wrong about special teams perhaps becoming special again this year. We just don’t have a kicker or punter who can handle the job. Palardy is on the way – saw him in the Aquinas-Byrnes game. He repeatedly kicked the ball into the stands behind the end zone on KO’s and his punts were 10 yards over the returners head because he “couldn’t adjust to how different Palardy’s kicks are from everyone else’s”.
My favorite moment from that HS game: the announcers went on-and-on about the Tennessee recruits at the game – while the graphic of the recruits has just faded from the screen, Urban Meyer is pictured on the sidelines.
Before UT gives Phil his next check, they should demand a written apology for leaving the cupboard bare. Going to throw up again….
they wore the defense down
Hardesty’s knee was obviously bothering him.
I felt like Crompton was bad the first half, but made better throws in the second half – the recievers just couldn’t catch them. Hopefully he can build on that second half
Missed tackles and dropped passes
I expect bad news from Crompton, but he was really only bad for a quarter. Missed tackles and dropped passes cost us this game, plain and simple. Remember the play in the 4th where THREE guys had the Auburn tailback in the backfield before he reversed fields and ended up gaining a first down? Reminded me of the missed 3rd down tackle on Tebow. And it happened way too much this game. Also, Hancock, Moore, and Jones all forgot that catching the ball is part of the receivers’ responsibilities (at least for three quarters). Improvement on those two scores would’ve made for a win.
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 4, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions
One thing that is getting overlooked...
…Is the lack of blocking. I think this is contributing to Crompton’s mistakes. Seems like the Center was getting blown off the ball repeatedly and it was causing him to step on Crompton, make bad snaps etc. JC had a few plays where he had time in the pocket and usually those passes were on target, although many of them were dropped.
Also, I think that the time of possession differential caused the missed tackles. The D was gassed from being on the field so long.
I also feel like our offense knows that they are letting our defense down. I have to imagine that if nothing else they read the media about how offensive mistakes ruined a defense that has continually held opponents to around 24 points despite turnovers and constantly being pu in bad field position. I think this is a bad thing, as evidenced last night. The ESPN announcers were talking about a heated argument between WRs and coaches, Brandon Warren again got put on the sidelines for attitude issues, etc.
If this stuff continues, I’m not very optimistic of a turnaround. All I can hope is that Tyler Bray is ready to go as a true Freshman and that EB14 decides he needs a master’s degree
by Prometheus1185 on Oct 4, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
what are the chances that Berry will stick around for another year of this, though?
I doubt i would. Situation’s just demoralizing.
Crompton is terrible right now, and everyone in Knoxville knows it.
So why was he asked to throw it 43 times last night? Even if Hardesty’s knee hurts, we have three other running backs, don’t we? Why doesn’t our offense look like last year’s Vandy game until we get a quarterback? I don’t understand it.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
why don't we run hurry up all the time?
that was the only time the offense had any flow whatsoever.
The Dual Threat, Official Enforcer/Stat Geek of MCM.
I was too
I don’t understand why Crompton and the offense need to start out making these huge mistakes. Crompton has shown signs of being a capable quarterback, it just seems to usually happen after the damage is done.
by Prometheus1185 on Oct 4, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions
It worked but let's all admit that the hurry up success was also a surprise
After all, what about our entire body of work in the passing game in the first half would lead us to believe that doing it faster would translate into success?
Would it be?
JC’s passes behind open receivers on crossing routes (leading to numerous drops); receivers and Crompton on different pages (leading to Hancock getting a pass in his earhole); or bad timing and accuracy issues (leading to Pat the announcer to comment that we’d run the same play 3 times and it only worked once on 4th down). Poor (but better) blocking that lead to pressured throws….
well
Auburn’s defense has a little to do with it. they’re playing soft zones late in the game. trying not to give up big plays. we come out like that against Alabama, and their defense might score the game’s first TD
congrats
I know the Vol nation must be very happy today coming within ten points of another SEC rival with the brilliant Lane Kiffin at the helm. I think losing to Georgia and Alabama by less than ten is within reach, this is shaping up to be a season to remember and it all started with the thrashing of the Gators, 13-23, Lane you the man!
Thanks Vols brass for firing Fulmer, with Kiffin’s 5-16 record as a head coach and his lame offense you obviously made the right choice and we appreciate it throughout the SEC!
by gatorz59 on Oct 4, 2009 11:08 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Wow,
….that was almost as annoying as the Bama trolls over at TrackEmTigers.
…..I think if UT fixes the “drops” issue, they can beat anyone on their schedule, including Bama. If UT had generated any offense in the first half, I think I’d have been a sad Tiger at the end of it. Good game, Vols.
I'm glad to hear an Auburn fan say that.
I thought much the same thing, but I wanted to be careful about putting it out there. Auburn has a lot to be proud of, but I really do think Tennessee lost the game more than Auburn won it.
I’ll have to check on that, though. But good game.
Well ... I'm not sure
Certainly the Vols played a good game, and I’ll agree that I’ll give Tennessee a much better shot now at UGa, Carolina, etc. than I would have before the game. That defense is going to suffocate people, Crompton looked downright comfortable in the hurry-up (sorry, but I have to ask again: where was that vs. Florida?), you guys really should be calling your running back “MANtario,” and without the drops, yeah, maybe this is a different game.
But hoop, I don’t think I can buy the notion that Tennessee “let one slip” or “lost the game more than Auburn won it.” Auburn never trailed, had outgained the Vols by more than 100 yards when Byrum’s FG effectively ended the game, never turned the ball over, etc. Sure, the Vols made mistakes, but so did Auburn—our kicker also missed a field goal (longer than Lincoln’s, but well within his range), McCalebb dropped a sure touchdown pass, three different red zone possessions ended in FGAs and three different Auburn possessions that crossed midfield ended in nothing. Tennessee had a lot do with that, of course … but still, if the score could have easily been closer, it could have easily been further apart, too. I’m also not sure you can say “If only Crompton had been more accurate” when we know that Crompton’s just not accurate; it would be like an Auburn fan saying “if only our run defense had been better” when I think we all knew Hardesty was going to gash us from time to time. Reasonable minds can differ, of course, but I thought Auburn was the better team on the night.
Still a good game, and best of luck going forward—I do think you guys can pick off at least one of the Dawgs or Cocks this month.
by JCCW Jerry on Oct 4, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It wouldn't have even required Crompton being more accurate.
All those dropped balls where he DID hit the receivers. The passing game had problems that went beyond just one player. If Tennessee could have played something resembling SEC football on offense in the first half, the defense would have been more rested and Auburn would have had fewer chances to score. 14 drives is waaaaay too many, and was strongly influenced by the many 3-and-ouch drives that UT had.
But again, I’m not in any way taking from Auburn in that one. They played very, very well.
And, Jerry, I'll observe again here, as elsewhere
What about Crompton’s prior performance in the first half and what about the Wide Receivers’ ability to catch the football would give the coaches the most remote bit of confidence that we should do that same passing game thing, but just do it faster in the hurry up offense? The correct answer for those paying attention at home and watching the football game is “Absolutely nothing”.
As Pat Hayden (Rhodes Scholar and really decent QB) noted, Crompton and Hancock ran the same pass route 3 times – it failed miserably twice – once on a drop by Hancock and once of a bad throw by Crompton – only to succeed on the third try as a fourth down conversion. He essentially said – great call, because it was open before , but go figure on why it worked on that 4th down.
Preseason, I had us beating South Carolina and losing to GA. It’d be nice to get one back toward the 8-4 dream (darn UCLA, Auburn).
Fair enough, Hooper
Pete, I’m not going to drag out the dead horse any further after this reply, but do you think maybe the fact that Kiffin finally showed enough confidence in Crompton to say “All right, screw it, we’re going no-huddle, make it happen” might have something to do with the fact that every single point Tennessee scored Saturday came in the hurry-up?
Honestly, you seem to be arguing that the coaches still shouldn’t have tried going no-huddle even though that was the only thing that worked for you—because hey, why do they something they had no confidence in? I don’t get it.
It seemed like a catch-22 at the time.
I bet you wouldn’t have found a single Vol fan willing to believe that those 4th quarter drives could have happened. But that’s the fun of it all.
And seriously, Auburn did play lights out. Does Todd ever make a mistake? I kept thinking that at some point in time, he’d surely throw to the wrong spot. Hope to see you all in Atlanta in the near future (by that, I mean 2010 or 2011, natch). And I hope that UT knocks off your cross-divisional rival this week.
by David Hooper on Oct 5, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Maybe the no-huddle is better for Crompton
I think he’s kind of a head case, but maybe when they run the no-huddle, he doesn’t have enough time to think and instead has to react. Maybe a stretch, but he looked much more “Crompetent” (heh heh) in the no huddle (although our defense was in a prevent-ish mode).
"You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." - Jeff Francouer
by jd is legend on Oct 5, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions
That actually is a good point.
I wish I could dredge the quote, but once when John Elway was asked about how he managed so many last-minute drives, he said something to the effect of it being easier because you had fewer things to consider. You knew what had to be done and you could just go do it.
But boy, what a scary way to conduct business.
Let's try one last time, Jerry
You are looking at it after the fact and saying, “Gee they should have done more of that.” With hindsight, I am brilliant as well.
But as the game unfolds, there’s nothing in Tennessee’s performance in the first 25:55 to suggest that the final drive of the first half will result in a TD if we employ the hurry up. Same deal in the 4th qtr. We were down 23-6 with 13 minutes and change left. The only shot is to run the hurry up.
The passing game had not worked at all. Receivers ran the wrong routes and dropped passes that hit them in the hands. Crompton threw crossing routes behind receivers leading to more drops; he threw a ball into quadruple coverage; his missed simple out patterns. There’s nothing in that litany of failure to lead anyone to expect that a hurry-up version of the same thing would work better…before it actually worked.
The argument is simply that the hurry-up success was a stunner, a complete surprise to everyone – including Coach Kiffin. i’m glad it worked because it does give a glimmer of hope, but c’mon – no one could have predicted it.
And, I think the point about changed defenses is a good one. Have a look at the video again and note the Chizik is telling his players to back off on those 4th qtr drives – especially after the roughing the QB penalty on the final drive.
Why wasn't there a hurry-up against Florida?
I understand that the passing game hadn’t inspired confidence, but UT was running their offense at normal pace, down by ten, late in the game. If you think your best chance to win is running the ball, then by all means, run the ball. That doesn’t mean you can’t hurry to the line and snap it as soon as possible.
"You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." - Jeff Francouer
by jd is legend on Oct 5, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Great win for your Tigers
Neyland is a tough place to win regardless of the mediocre team hosting you. I know I will be tuning in whenever you guys are on TV, just to see that zany Malzahn offense. It’s fun to watch.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
Were you looking for GVX?
This looks like it should’ve gone in the comment section there.
Eric Berry for sending the guy who wins the Heisman spinning 720 degrees in the air at the podium - or for intercepting it and returning it to where it rightfully belongs
by Chris Pendley on Oct 4, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I was thinking the same thing
I think this d-bag troll is the same gaytorz guy from GVX. At least we have mods smart enough to perma-ban him if necessary….
Neyland Stadium: Home of the biggest bust in quarterbacking history.
Hey Jon! How long will it take me to repress the memories??
Oh, I didn't even realize he'd be on both boards. I don't even touch GVX, generally.
‘course, the reason I don’t touch GVX is half the commentators seem to consider it an accomplishment to breathe in their nose and out through their mouth, so there’s that.
Eric Berry for sending the guy who wins the Heisman spinning 720 degrees in the air at the podium - or for intercepting it and returning it to where it rightfully belongs
by Chris Pendley on Oct 4, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually force myself to read a few comments at the end of each story.
Just so I remember how lucky we are to have RTT.
Neyland Stadium: Home of the biggest bust in quarterbacking history.
Hey Jon! How long will it take me to repress the memories??
wait till he gets quality players in at QB and reciever
if we are still losing then, come back and talk all the trash you want
your savior(meyer) will be at notre dame this time next year
"Albert hits good pitches hard and bad pitches even harder. And when he gets in the batter's box, if you pray, then you start praying. And if you don't pray, you think about starting."--Brian Bannister
And the Gator fans wonder why everyone thinks Lane is in their/Urban's head?
Your honor, I present Exhibit A, gatorz59.
Their collective jorts are twisted so far up in a bunch that this is the best attempt at smack they can come up with. Such stale material.
Surely you can do better than this.
Ball, oskie, cover, block, cut and slice, pursue and gang tackle... for this is the WINNING EDGE.
by pound the rock on Oct 4, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Classic
Their collective jorts are twisted so far up in a bunch
Unbelievable...
Get some class. Honestly, It was a great game and we were all on the edge of our seats until the end. I’m sure the Vols’ will win some big games this year, they’re too good not to. Good luck to you guys!
by auburn tigers on Oct 4, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Crompton
I’m just a voice in the wilderness here, and I’m truly not trying to stir the pot, but just out of curiosity… why the hell won’t the staff play Stephens? I mean, Crompton is a known commodity at this point, right? There’s little to zero chance he will improve into even a semi-competent quarterback. Nick Stephens was a man of few big plays but wouldn’t you take him and his low-turnover rate for a few first downs and maybe a few field goals here or there?
I’m surprised there aren’t calls to switch quarterbacks. How does a coach choose not to bench this guy for good? Again, no antagonism is intended with this line of questioning.
Orange and Blue Hue: The World through GATOR-colored Glasses -- http://www.orangeandbluehue.com
hate to agree with you but
i do….the inability to hit those crossing routes last nite was unacceptable…i really believe i could have completed a few of those passes
"Albert hits good pitches hard and bad pitches even harder. And when he gets in the batter's box, if you pray, then you start praying. And if you don't pray, you think about starting."--Brian Bannister
Apparently
Lane Kiffin is biased against gingers. ;-) Or so somebody pontificated during the live blog.
I’m not sure there is really a difference tbh. A lot of these troubles also have to do with the WR’s and O-line. I do believe Fulmer quit recruiting about 3-4 years ago altogether.
Neyland Stadium: Home of the biggest bust in quarterbacking history.
Hey Jon! How long will it take me to repress the memories??
Heard he calls Stephens "Ginger Balls"
Just a rumor, you know how those things are.
Ball, oskie, cover, block, cut and slice, pursue and gang tackle... for this is the WINNING EDGE.
by pound the rock on Oct 4, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions
It's a good and honest question.
I do know that Crompton tends to look very sharp throughout practices, and that gamedays seem to be the aberration. I just wonder if this aberration (which is obviously here to stay) was something that the coaches needed to see to believe. Without being in the meetings and all, we just can’t know.
At this point, I do think everybody would be quite willing to accept this as a rebuilding year and see Stephens in the game to get experience for next year. But Crompton is Crompton, and I’m not sure what else to add to the conversation at this point.
I agree
With the rebuilding year thing. The rich rodriguez-tate forcier thing in Michigan proves that even if Kiffin goes 5-7 this year, he could improve next year and compete. With the talent he’s bringing in that seems likely.
My only issue is that if we’re looking at this as a rebuilding year, we should look to start Stephens simply because getting him experience before next season puts us in better shape as far as giving us a starter while Bray continues to learn the system. Very few guys come in ready to start, I mean look at Jimmy Clausen, he was pretty bad as a freshman. I’m not expecting Bray to be the savior of UT football as a freshman, if anything it’s likely to be another rebuilding year.
by Prometheus1185 on Oct 4, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I think, if we were to be totally honest with ourselves, 2011 is the target.
We will be rebuilding virtually the entire offensive line next year. o.O
by David Hooper on Oct 4, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions
We keep throwing that "compete" word around
That’s what’s deceptive and frustrating about right now – we are competitive.
Maybe the defense and the frustration give way and we get busted up by Georgia or Bama or Carolina or all of the above. But I’m sure no matter how much Kiffin’s looking towards 2011, when you’re as close to winning as we’ve been in all three of our losses, right now you’re still playing for 2009 even if you’d admit it’s a rebuilding year.
by Will Shelton on Oct 4, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Kicker
i don’t know if it’s been mentioned, but Daniel Lincoln’s injured leg may have cost us the game.
this is very hypothetical, but stick w me
If he hadn’t missed that FG early on, we could have been driving the ball down only 1 score, rather than 2 in the 4th quarter. After we failed to convert on 3rd down, we kicked a FG to go down by 7. But had we been down only 7 to begin with, gone for it on 4th down, and missed… Auburn would’ve taken over in much worse field position than they did in the ensuing kick-off, taking it to midfield and essentially sealing the game.

by 
























