USC 77 Tennessee 55 - All Questions, No Answers
The #9 Vols went to Los Angeles and turned in a horrific performance against the Trojans, in a stunning 77-55 loss. There is nothing good to say about what we saw out there today. There's plenty to say otherwise.
The Value of a Point Guard
Mike Gerrity got clearance from the NCAA to play late last week, a transfer from UNC-Charlotte to USC. He hadn't played collegiate basketball in twenty-one months. And in his first game back, he had 12 points, 10 assists, and 5 rebounds. Tennessee had no one who could guard him, no one who could prevent him from going coast-to-coast and either scoring or drawing a foul, and didn't learn to watch for the deep ball leaving his hands on the inbounds pass.
It's not just that Gerrity was the hardest working man on the floor; you expect that in part when someone hasn't played in so long and then returns. It's that you saw what a true point guard brings to an offense - something the Vols haven't had since CJ Watson. It wasn't just Gerrity's scoring, it was his poise and leadership. He directed the Trojan offense, distributed the ball well, and provided leadership to the entire team.
This is what Bruce Pearl needs, and has been unable to find. Bobby Maze and Melvin Goins have good qualities, but they're not pure point guards, and they don't bring stability and poise to the offense - they're not leaders. Which raises a much bigger question for the Vols:
Who is the leader of this team?
There is both a personality component and an on-the-floor component to this question, but it's very valid. When the Vols need a bucket, who do they go to? And when the team is in a funk and falling behind, who will pick this team up? Who will put them on their shoulders and turn the tide? Who will carry that responsibility?
Right now, the best-case answer is we don't know yet. And the worst-case answer is no one, because most of these guys faced this question last year.
Is it Tyler Smith? He was nonexistent in the first half and not much better in the second, finishing with 3 points on 1-6 shooting. Is it Wayne Chism? Chism has no problem taking shots, and I'm not even upset about his performance today (3 of 11, 1 of 7 from three)...but the fact that 7 of his 11 shots were threes tells a more troubling story: the Vols got no post game today, in part because USC clogged the lane the whole game, but in part because it's just not there. How often does this team run plays for Chism or Smith on the block? How often did we last year?
Who on this team plays with authority at the rim? Who is the physical presence that can prevent a rebounding performance like today, where the Trojans treated the Vols like children on the block and picked up an inexplicable 43-17 rebounding advantage? I understand lots of things and know we're not always going to play our best game, but I will never understand not boxing out and standing around waiting for the rebound to come to you. While the Vols were standing around, two Trojans recorded double-doubles: Alex Stepheson (19-16) and Nikola Vucevic (15-10).
Who will lead this team?
Playing with poise on offense
Pearl said it before the game: you'd better value possessions against USC, or you're going to lose. The Trojans stacked the lane and dared the Vols to take bad shots, and the Vols were more than happy to oblige:
- 20 of 58 from the floor, 34.5%
- 2 of 22 from the arc, 9.1%
- 13 of 25 from the line, 52%
Tennessee got impatient, tried to play one-on-one, and didn't take advantage of trips to the free throw line. The Vols settled for threes that weren't going down, and had no better option. At no point did we use the phrase "good ball movement" or even "great pass" watching the game today - the Vols played like five individuals instead of one team on offense. In the first half, the Vols went the final 4:30 without making a shot. In the second half, the Vols went another 7:00 without a made basket, and USC put the game away.
Meanwhile, USC was patient and incredibly efficient: the Trojans took only 42 shots, but made 23 of them (54.8%). 3 of 7 from the arc. A merciless 28 of 35 from the line (80.0%). Even though the Trojans turned the ball over 18 times - a number you would've felt good about as a Tennessee fan coming in - their efficiency more than made up for it. Despite playing a seven man rotation, the Trojans didn't tire, they just kept playing their pace, and it worked brilliantly - this is a team that averaged 59 points per game coming in, and thanks to Gerrity and poise, scored almost 80 today. USC beat the Vols in every phase - and that includes the fact that Bruce Pearl got outcoached by Kevin O'Neill.
Where do we go from here?
Well, we go to Wednesday, where the 8-2 Vols will host North Carolina A&T. Then we go to Memphis on New Year's Eve, where these questions will almost certainly present themselves again. And if the Vols don't get answers soon, they're going to keep coming up short.
Tennessee has a bunch of good, talented players. But playing like this, we are not a good team. Who will take charge and show some authority with this team? And who will become the guy or group of guys we can count on when we need points? Until we find the answers to those questions, Tennessee will not be as good as they want to be. If they thought they were already, they got a dose of reality today.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Watching our half-court offense can be really painful
There doesn’t seem to be any urgency or will.
Neyland Stadium-It goes to eleven.
pitiful
we got outplayed.plain and simple. until the vols come together as a team, they will not live up to their hype. the shooting was horrible. the defense was pathetic.
holy cow
we didnt need that. Nice write-up
Our problems don't seem to be overwhelming
they are just the same ones that we endured last year, which is disconcerting…
Neyland Stadium-It goes to eleven.
Talented enough to be upset at losing to #4 Purdue
but unmotivated enough to be treated like 8 year old girls on the backboards by the 5-4 USC Trojans.
If Gerrity did this to us, what will John Wall do? Gerrity is a good kid, but he’s not a great point guard by any means. He was playing for Charlotte – not any of those other schools in North Carolina.
That was awful. Just awful.
Leadership
This is a problem seen in other situations when you ask a worker to step up to a even a low level supervisory position…. Tyler is still trying to be their friend and not taking charge with the authority he needs to, and that does NOT mean doing it all yourself. He’s going to have to get serious about being a leader and an encourager / pusher and STOP being an enabler.
hmmm cant defend guards, chism wasting his talent screwing around behind the arc
sounds familiar.
The Dual Threat, Official Enforcer/Stat Geek of MCM.
I agree with your analysis of the game....
but why was this game so stunningly worse than any other we have played so far? If they are this bad, why hasn’t it shown up before now, at least some aspects of it? Because I have to say that until this game, I thought they looked a lot better than they did as this point last year. As Joel pointed out here, our defense has been pretty darn good. We’ve definitely been scoring points.
There’s no doubt there is a problem. My hope is that it’s not as bad as one would think if you only looked at this one game.
"It breaks your heart. It is designed to break your heart. The game begins in the spring, when everything else begins again, and it blossoms in the summer, filling the afternoons and evenings, and then as soon as the chill rains come, it stops and leaves you to face the fall alone." A. Bartlett Giamatti
I feel like I've seen this movie before
And I don’t like how it ends. Now, I was doing my best to escape Virginia and the Blizzard of 2009, so I didn’t see any of the game. But the inability to hit 3’s, nobody stepping up to be a leader, can’t defend the perimeter…that all sounds very familiar.
I’ve been trying to say that I didn’t think this team looked significantly better than last year’s team and I think this is the first result that really points to that. It parallels the trip to Temple last year (minus Dionte Christmas going nuts, of course) and probably does not bode well for the future. I want to be wrong, I want them to be successful…but right now, this looks like a team destined to fight for 3rd in the East behind UK and UF.
My feelings exactly
Although Bruce seems to have Billy D’s number. So we may have a head to head over Florida, even if the team isn’t as good.
This year and last year have been Pearl’s most talented teams. They’ve also been his worst teams. Because they can’t play a half-court game. I’m starting to wonder if he can’t coach his own players. And if that is the case, that is seriously bad. Hopefully this is something that will be overcome (maybe by a coaching adjustment, maybe by some new recruits). But it’s a problem that’s lasted more than a season now, and it has me worried.
by Incipient_Senescence on Dec 22, 2009 12:13 AM EST up reply actions
And Florida just lost to South Alabama
so everything’s not peachy in the Sunshine state.
Any bets on whether Kentucky loses a single SEC game this year? Not even Coach Cal (worst bench coach on the planet) can screw up this much talent.

by 















