Tennessee's Quarterback Conundrum: Crompton or Coleman?
With the whirlwind of change and improvement Lane Kiffin has ushered into Knoxville, the biggest question he will encounter is one he may not be able to answer immediately.
Lack of production at the QB position was the impetus behind last season’s disaster and Phil Fulmer’s subsequent removal. Clearly, that position will be heard from yet again as Kiffin was unable to attract any top QB recruits due to his late entrance onto the recruiting scene.
For the triumvirate of thus-far mediocre quarterbacks on the depth chart, this was a lifeline and opportunity to show that last season was a result of ineffectual coaching and not a lack of ability.
The consensus seems to be that Kiffin and offensive coordinator Jim Chaney will be a significant upgrade over Fulmer and the comically overmatched Dave Clawson. But questions remain over which QB will reap the benefit of the new coaches. Who will emerge as “the guy” within Chaney’s new offense?
If all things are equal (and apart from Eric Berry everyone seems to be tabula rasa with Kiffin) then consider me a B.J. Coleman guy (Full disclosure: Coleman and I may be fellow graduates of the same high school).
While Jonathan Crompton seems to be the clubhouse leader, I have some strong doubts about his ability to effectively quarterback an SEC team. Let’s make like Dr. Phil and analyze the motivating factors behind these doubts.
Accuracy
There are many foibles a traditional QB can have, but one that is almost unforgivable is a propensity for ladder-climbing overthrows, ground-balling throws, and throws of the interceptive variety.
This is akin to an actor stuttering. Is it the end of the world? Certainly not, but you won’t find that actor in a Steven Spielberg or Martin Scorsese movie.
When an offense is centered around the notion that the quarterback will deliver the ball to his receivers in a timely and accurate manner, failure in this regard results in a long and slow death from 8 yard bounce passes on 10 yard routes.
Historically, Crompton has surfed between the 50 and 60% barriers in completion percentage throughout his career, which would be swell if he played baseball. Unfortunately, he does not. But what he does do by shot-putting his passes is threaten the mental well being of orange-clad fans everywhere.
Before I come off as too down on Crompton, let me say this: I will grant the guy a certain leeway as he found himself chained to offense more suited to an intramural flag football team. I daresay that Peyton Manning himself would have had issues with some of the stick in the dirt plays Clawson featured in his playbook. But let us not lay all the blame at Clawson’s feet. He wasn’t exactly coaching a group of young Tom Bradys.
Ill-suited
Regardless of the coaching staff, there is a basic level of ability that needs to be exhibited by the quarterback. Does American Idol expect the blind contest, Scott MacIntyre, to dance and cavort around the stage like the other contestants? Absolutely not. The producers wouldn’t think of asking that of him because he simply doesn’t possess the capability to do so.
Similarly, is it fair to ask Jonathan Crompton to competently run a pro-style offense?
In the right system, I could see Crompton being very effective as a homeless man’s Tim Tebow, but not within a traditional pro-style attack. He is more of a tough guy QB and this is evidenced in his willingness to go helmet-to-helmet with SEC safeties. But this same willingness is the greatest indicator of the poor fit he is at quarterback.
It’s sweet when Tim Tebow rolls over SEC defenders, but not everyone is bulletproof. For the rest of the mortals playing QB, it should be scramble, slide, and duck in that order. Crompton’s ardor to engage defenders is symptomatic of his poor decision making skills and to run a pro-style offense against SEC defenders, a QB must be a good decision maker first and foremost.
Case in point: John Parker Wilson. He rode a superior defense and running game to the cusp of the national title game. Was it sexy football? Not entirely, but then again getting spanked by Wyoming at home isn’t exactly sexy either now is it?
Wilson was able to overcome some physical shortcomings by making good decisions. I don’t believe Crompton can make the adjustment of checking down, throwing away, or sliding out of harm’s way.
Understanding the Hype
Crompton is undoubtedly talented and his abilities were recognized coming out of high school in 2005, as he was a 5-star recruit and ranking just behind Mark Sanchez and Ryan Perriloux among QBs. But talent alone doesn’t make the man; just ask Jeff George or Ryan Leaf. The more important question is how is he talented? How did he become highly sought after?
If we take a closer look at Crompton’s origins, we see him emerging from a high school and conference (or district, region, what have you) from which nary one significant prospect has sprung forth from. Isn’t that slightly disconcerting?
Compare this to B.J. Coleman who arrived in Knoxville fresh off a high school career that saw him consistently tangling with future major conference recruits while lighting up the stat sheet.
My friend Scott Simmons has an interesting theory on players like Crompton. He posits that players from smaller schools and/or rural areas are more prone to failure in major conferences because they are never forced to develop the finer skills of their game in high school. They can largely rely on their superior athleticism against a substandard pool of players much in the same way that you or I repeatedly rely on the spread option to dominate computer opponents in NCAA ‘09.
These stars rarely meet a worthy opponent amongst the litany of mediocre challengers they face on a week-to-week basis. Therefore, their adjustment to the rigors of SEC football is a difficult one as they begin to experience opponents who are equally skilled if not more so.
Crompton’s aforementioned propensity for slamming into safeties cleanly evidences this idea. In 3A North Carolina rural football, this tactic may have brought him success and glory as he bulldozed 130 lb safeties. But in the SEC, all this guarantees is playing time for your backup and a healthy helping of neck stingers.
Simply put, Crompton is an unnatural fit at the position. He’s a throwback version of a QB when they were able to run free without fear of concussion from blazingly fast linebackers or headhunting safeties. Due to the evolution and sophistication of both the QB position and opposing defenses, the stylistic tendencies of his game have been rendered endangered and obsolete.
Has B.J. Coleman proven that he is head and shoulders above Crompton? Not yet, but he offers something Crompton doesn’t have: natural skills and instincts for the position. I believe that he deserves the opportunity to start more than Crompton deserves another chance to possibly fail.
There has long been a rumor swirling around Coleman that in being groomed by Cutcliffe as the next player in a long line of Cutcliffian successes at QB, he was denied the opportunity once Cutcliffe left for Duke. It seemed that Fulmer was eager to prove his own skill at producing QBs, and this meant competing with his own selections and not Coleman. In other words, Epic Fail.
It was only after the advanced stages of rigor mortis had set it on the Vol’s season that Coleman was given a chance to play, which hardly provided an accurate read on whether or not he can run an offense.
Who can say how valid the rumor is, but if David Cutcliffe deems a QB worthy of playing within his system, I think it’s only smart to kick the tires and see how well Coleman performs.
Regardless of the decision, Kiffin has acquired enough fan capital to try his luck with a reborn Crompton if he so chooses. But my hope is that he recognizes Crompton for the square peg in a round hole that he is and instead invests in making the more naturally talented and savvy Coleman his QB for the future.
FanPosts are most often submitted by users. The views and opinions expressed in FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by the editorial staff of Rocky Top Talk or SB Nation.
1 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Well put.
I would have to agree with Coleman being a very talented QB. Having seen his skill firsthand, I can say with certainty that he was a very key component in continuing a win streak over my Alma Mater that now can no longer be represented on two hands (images of Coleman burning Baylor’s secondary repeatedly jumps in my head like so many bad dreams). It would seem that spring practice would be very key for Coleman. So far, it seems that Crompton has been exceeding expectations. However, the bar is understandably low. Hopefully, Coleman can match the production and resume being the unbelievable QB I saw dismantling Baylor year after year. Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to see him burn Florida’s secondary sometime in the near future. At which point, I couldn’t care less where he graduated from! I would easily trade another year of McCallie thrashing Baylor if the Vols could somehow find a way to beat the Gators in the swamp this year. Either way, this should be fun.
To Strive, To Seek, To Find, and Not to Yield.
by mike2ray on Mar 28, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
While it would be nice to see crompton go out with a stellar senior season, we need Coleman. I have nightmares at night remembering crompton attempting to run the offense. Throughout the 2008 season, the word crompton became synonymous with the f bomb in my house, and I never want to go through another crompton year again. BJ, on the other hand, I have never heard anything but good things about, and if Cut says hes good, than hes good. Plus, if he starts this year, we have him for 2 more yrs, as opposed to cromptons one-and-done with him being a senior. I believe in Kiffin, and I will support whoever Kiffin decides to put under center wholeheartedly. But personally…BJ is m’boy.
by cincyvol6198 on Mar 28, 2009 8:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You have some great points in there.
The bit about small-school talent is probably pretty true, as unfortunate as it may be. At this point, Crompton has had 2 years under Cutcliffe and 1 under Clawson. We can at least hope that the Cutcliffe years took away a lot of that rustic roughness and that the Clawson year didn’t leave any permanent damage (again: hope, not assume).
No matter who wins, I’ll be pulling for them on Saturdays.
by Hooper on Mar 29, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is too much of a hit piece.
Don’t get me wrong I was probably Crompton’s biggest critic last year but this seems a little unfair. We never got a good look at Crompton last year. The offense was so terrible I think that maybe the system had more to blame than just Crompton. I also think that Crompton didn’t play well either and all things combined equaled a perfect storm.
However, this is a new staff and I believe a new Crompton. To throw him under the bus already isn’t fair we are only a couple of weeks into spring practice. Why don’t we let the coaches do the analysing first and hear their reports of where the QB’s are before we start deciding who the leader should be.
This is TN fandom at its worst. Sorry. Don’t mean to offend. But for Pete’s sake give him a chance to succeed/fail before you crucify him. Let’s forget last year and what happend and start anew. The coaches themselves said this is a new year and people have to earn it. I believe them when they say that. So lets as fans do the same. Let’s not hash over what did or didn’t happen last year and look forward with a fresh start.
I think this is what we really need and what the team needs. Just imagine if Crompton were to look back instead of forward? It would ruin him. Lets help him out and the team out and just look forward.
by BigBeefe on Mar 29, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not a hit piece...
Thanks for the comments.
This was definitely not a hit piece. When a QB struggles to make basic throws, it is difficult to be confident in him. Past is prologue and you can write me off as an example of “fandom at it’s worst,” but the problem last year was bigger than a poor offensive plan. It was lack of leadership and ability.
by rkmccoy on Mar 29, 2009 7:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well written, and some good points made
I wouldn’t call it a hit piece, really, but if BigBeefe’s point was that it was written with a presupposed conclusion, I can see that. That’s pretty common, though. Thanks for posting it.
Rocky Top Talk
by Joel on Mar 29, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Completely...
100 % presupposed. Thanks!
by rkmccoy on Mar 30, 2009 8:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















