The Re-Animation of David Clawson - How 'Bout Them Cold-Weather Springs?
In which we look at the Clawfense from the third person perspective. Quite possibly the cheapest brain massage you'll ever receive.
Perusing through the archives of Rocky Top Talk, I had a little fun looking at the posts from about a year ago. There was some good news, like the commitment of Josh Nunes (boy, wouldn't it be nice to have him aboard right about now?), a certain Fulmer Cup news item from a certain university to the hotward side of Tennessee, some reasons to be excited about having a brand-new starter at the quarterback position, and the requisite excitement about the mysterious Clawfense.
Yes, those were the days, when we had no clue what the Clawfense was and we liked it that way. Nowadays, we have too much of an idea what it's like, and we liked it much better when we didn't know. (Hey, it's a mistake we all make at some point in our lives. We fell for the pretty avatar and the cute IM chats, and we learned our lesson the hard way when we decided to meet Tracee1639 for a blind date - only to find out we've hooked up with a plumber named Jack in a cheap blond wig. Sober up, cowboy.)
Well, if you haven't gotten over 2008 yet, there's not a whole lot I can say. But life goes on, and at some point you offhandedly wonder just whatever happened to that crazy plumber. For UT fans, the answer is as close as the internet.
Every once in a while over the last few months, I would take a quick look through the news feeds to see just what's become of our once-beloved offensive coordinator. We all know he got the head coaching gig at Bowling Green, but that's about as far as the story has traveled around here. Granted, some of you would like to leave it there, but it's the summer and news is scarce, so now seems like a good time to run through Clawson's offseason and see how things are going.
But first, just in case you blocked last season from your memory, here's a little video Joel whipped up a while ago. Remember, a repressed memory will only hurt; let it out and be free from the pain.
A Quick Reminder
Some of the post-partem news from the UT front included a little venting from Josh Briscoe: "That offense wasn't putting us there. That offense held us back a lot." In that article, it seems that the team was told straight-up that the offense was a multi-year project. (Which would have been nice for the fans to know, rather than being told that the scheme wasn't the problem.) After getting picked up by the Steelers, Ramon Foster was happy to bid the Clawfense farewell: ""As far as that strong/weakside stuff, I wouldn't venture that I would ever see that again." An interesting side note about the offensive line last year was the issue of weight gain, and just how much heavier (and slower?) they were under Clawson.
A New Home
But hey, there are two sides to every coin. As happy as Big Orange Nation was to see Clawson go, I'm sure that he was happy to leave and start anew. We weren't a very fun lot to be around last year and I'm sure that the Clawsons found that traditional Appalachian hospitality to be a little lacking by December. Clawson must have been happy to be so warmly received in his new digs. (Photos here.) And with a new home comes new hope: Rivals.com was kind enough to point out that Clawson was inheriting a better team than the 6-6 record suggested. (snicker) Clawson even had plenty of story lines to keep things interesting. For one, he'll open the new season against a former quarterback of his - from Richmond. The Bowling Green faithful were happy to hear of the talent he was able to assemble at his 1-AA stop in Richmond. (With links, links, links, and more links. NFL Talent! Yay!)
And hey, this Bowling Green team was able to do something last year that Tennessee couldn't. Beat Wyoming. In Laramie. So when these Cowboy-killers got their hands on the 1-AA hotshot coach, what could possibly go wrong?
Spring Practice
SEC fans love them some spring practice, but sometimes we forget just how well off we have it in the South. Take spring practice in Bowling Green Ohio, for example. Clawquote: "To win championships in cold weather, at some point you have to have the ability to run the football. If your offense is dependent on 80 degrees and sunny, this probably isn't a great place to do it." Yeah, I guess that makes sense. If you're not going to pass the ball for the first two years, someplace freakin' cold would be the place to do it. By the way, this may answer the reason that Big Televen teams don't play football in December: the football players are on standby for snowplow duties on the weekends.
Nonetheless, the offense was excited to have Clawson. The offense is mysterious and is still being "kept under wraps". Clawson plans on getting the ball to the playmakers and will be flexible. He promises. The experienced quarterback appeared to have the inside track for the starting gig, but the offense may be run-first. Overall, the offense brings back a lot of starters and chemistry. The defense? Four three returning starters. More on that in a bit.
Keep the "new starting quarterback" thing in your head, though. I never did track down the numbers, but I had heard several times on the Sports Animal towards the end of last season that the Clawfense took a full year to get on track if the qb was a returning starter, but two full years otherwise.
Spring Game
I'm sure they have a fancy title for their spring game but I'm not inclined to look it up. If you're desperate enough for something resembling football, you can always check out the video highlights here (and then check into rehab). They used an offense-friendly scoring system and saw the day end 66-47 in favor of the offense. However, reading into it, it sounds like the defense really had the better of things on that day, shutting down both the 1st- and 2nd-string offense for most of the day, including the first five drives in a row. The offense did get on track in the second half, and I'm sure that had nothing to do with the offensive play calls being tailored to the defensive calls.
That wouldn't necessarily stand out as a problem, except that the only returning D-line player (and arguably the best player on the team), Michael Ream, was dismissed two weeks prior to the spring game. As it turns out, the dude (who has a great photo and undoubtedly kept his head warm through the Ohio winters) got the "violating team rules" boot, which means that the BGSU defense dominated the offense without any returning starters on the defensive line.
Vols fans, if this isn't providing any catharsis or closure yet, just remember where we were last year and re-run the implications of Bowling Green's spring practices and scrimmage through your head. May your road to recovery be gilded with visions of schadenfreude.
Preseason: Bringing it Home
In light of all that has transpired in Clawson's career and in the spring for Bowling Green, Rivals.com has seen fit to predict a strong offensive season for the Falcons. (Go ahead and re-read that.) The Boy from Rock M Nation has an in-depth preview of Bowling Green because Missouri will play them this year. It's interesting that he sees a rebuilding project underway for the Falcons. Athlon Sports also warns of this 2-year window that Clawson seems to carry around.
But perhaps the most interesting piece of predictive writing comes from this Athlon article. In it, they posit that Bowling Green was trying to get over some ethics and integrity problems in the team that weren't well-checked by the previous staff. That would make Clawson their 'straight-arrow' guy - somebody brought in to clean house more so than build a dynasty. The dismissal of Michael Ream seems to fit that pattern, so perhaps the whole 'offensive genius' thing isn't the real draw that brought Clawson to Bowling Green.
Which would make sense.
4 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
Excellent
I hate (well I guess I do) to see that it’s not working out for him offensively, but it makes me feel so much better about our chances this season given the results of their spring game. The conclusion I draw from this article is that the “Clawfense” basically sucks no matter where he goes, so we should see immediate improvement this season here at Tennessee just because he’s not pulling the strings anymore if nothing else.
Sad for Fulmer, but he hired the guy and he’s accountable for that decision.
Nice write-up Hoop, rec’d
Tennessee WILL beat Georgia on the way to 9+ wins in '09!!!
by VolBrian on Jul 1, 2009 8:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great post
I agree with VolBrian, mostly, although I still want to know what it can do after a full two years before I declare the entire concept faulty. It’s at least faulty from a speed-of-installation standpoint, though.
Rocky Top Talk
by Joel on Jul 1, 2009 8:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, if it's a 2-year install and BG is willing to give that much time, it's only fair to wait before judging.
Not that any of us are going to be interested in how this story turns out 2 years from now. I must admit that I’m curious to see if it works; I’m just not that curious.
And thanks, VB.
by Hooper on Jul 1, 2009 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess
I should’ve said “not working out thus far”, but if he’s having the exact same trouble offensively in spring practice at BG as he did here, then it is not looking good for his offense this coming season.
I also am somewhat interested to see what happens in the second year.
That also raises the question: I wonder if Fulmer knew it was a two-year project going in, and, if so, why did he still hire him knowing the perennial expectations of UT’s football program? Or at least tell the masses something about it being a two year deal?Telling anybody that would not have saved his job with such hideous performance last season, but at least it would’ve taken some of the heat off him.
I guess he’s never been a pass-the-buck kind of guy, which is admirable in it’s own right.
Tennessee WILL beat Georgia on the way to 9+ wins in '09!!!
by VolBrian on Jul 1, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What exactly is the entire concept?
Has anyone actually figured that out? What offense was Clawson trying to install? What is this clawfense that you speak of?
by kidbourbon on Jul 1, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He never was a good fit here
Which is a reflection on Fulmer’s judgment as much as it is on him. But I’m not going to dwell on that.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
by rustytanton on Jul 1, 2009 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bad fits happen all the time
They can’t always be identified ahead of time.
Fulmer apparently knew the Clawfense was a multi-year project, but he was probably feeling pretty secure in his job. He may have believed that it was the long-term answer, and feeling safe, decided to go ahead and undertake the project. I mean, it was unthinkable that Fulmer wouldn’t survive the season at this point last year.
With a better implementation plan and more time, it may have worked. Turns out he wasn’t quite as solid as he may have thought he was. What ifs don’t win games or pay the bills, but it is conceivable that things could have been better with the Clawfense this year. I mean, it took three seasons and personnel changes for Meyer’s offense to fully take in Gainesville, and it could have gotten real ugly in 2005 if it wasn’t for the loads of talent that Ron Zook left behind.
Instead, it’s the fourth scheme in five years for Tennessee. Good luck with that.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
by Year2 on Jul 1, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly why we're trying not to build expectations up this year.
We got burned pretty badly last year on that, and given the Wheel-O-Offense that UT has been recently, it’s only fair to give the players a chance to forget old things. Especially last year’s old things. (Which they probably forgot about 0.000023 seconds after the Kentucky game went final. Assuming they ever knew it.)
I have absolutely no idea what kind of expectations to have for this year. 2010? Nat’l Championship. But 2009? /shrugs
by Hooper on Jul 1, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure we'll survive...
Don’t worry too much about us. ;-)
I think the thing we may be overlooking is that, by all the “Clawfense” info we have available to us, I just don’t think that scheme was gonna work in the SEC at all.
Richmond is one thing, and Bowling Green might get it to work, but not in this conference.
Jonathon Crompton may well revert to the form he had against LSU in 2007, at least we all hope, and that would just be another indication that Clawson just doesn’t belong in this league.
Tennessee WILL beat Georgia on the way to 9+ wins in '09!!!
by VolBrian on Jul 1, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still say the worst part for Fulmer
Was the fact that the ol’ vanilla offense that everyone grumbled about would’ve been enough by itself – same personnel, different playcalling, more run and less Crompton – to beat UCLA and Wyoming last year. Not sure if 7-5 would’ve saved the man’s job or not, but I just remember being excited about finally seeing something new at this time last year…and something new ends up putting him down.
Will - Rocky Top Talk
by Will on Jul 1, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think 7-5 would have bought him another year
The UCLA game was really the most painful I think, and the cloud stayed with him the rest of the season. That was not a very good football team.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
by rustytanton on Jul 1, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
Nobody will ever know, but I view the final straw not as the 5-7 record but the fact that the season was one without any peaks. In most seasons we could at least point to one victory that was a good one. Not so in 2008. 7-5 may have gotten him through, though, I don’t know.
Rocky Top Talk
by Joel on Jul 1, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying people would be happy, or that he wouldn't be on the hot seat the following year
I just don’t think he would have been fired. Hindsight being 20-20 and all.
"Florida didnt win their first SEC title until 1991 and now they think they invented football."
-Ron Zook
by rustytanton on Jul 1, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That loss to UCLA was one of, if not the, low point of my 33 years as a Tennessee fan.
And it may have been the low point of the program’s history.
Official MCM Hater!
"I'm a professional towel stomper...I've seen the big Ben Roethlisberger sandwich on TV"
by gramsey712 on Jul 1, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At the same time,
it was the running game that cost them against Auburn and put the final nail in the coffin against Florida. There were problems in the run phase in the offense, and I’m not sure that all of it can be attributed to defenses stacking 13 guys in the box since we couldn’t pass.
I do agree with you, though; the simple, basic stuff would have been blissfully boring and would have salvaged a game or two. But I think that would have cost him his job for a different reason: just imagine him having taken a chance on a 1-AA guy and having to strip down the offense to junior high level stuff just to salvage things.
But no matter how all that cuts, it underscores just how great of a job Chavis did with the defense. For all I complained about the second half against UCLA, the D was the only thing between 5-7 and 3-9 or 2-10. And they almost pulled off 7-5 despite the offensive problems.
by Hooper on Jul 1, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
Thanks to Joel for that video. Anytime we struggle to win against an inferior team, or suffer a heartbreaking loss like the above mentioned 2007 LSU game, all we gotta do now is post that video and eveybody can feel a little better…
Tennessee WILL beat Georgia on the way to 9+ wins in '09!!!
by VolBrian on Jul 1, 2009 10:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gator Fan makes a good point....
Until we restore the running game at Tennessee we won’t be good again. We sure as heck will never beat Florida again until we run the football. All 6 times we have beaten the Gators in the last two decades, we ran the ball on them. Only once in that timeframe (2000) did we run the ball and still lose to the Gators.
Hopefully Oku and Bryce can change all that. Running the ball well will open up so many things for our offense but also keep our D off the field as it seemed like most games they spent most of the game on the field last year. Kiff plans to run bootlegs and use JC’s feet as a strength. When you don’t run the football, the bootleg is useless.
by Jan221973 on Jul 1, 2009 5:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What is your rationale?
Do the orange jerseys prevent our receivers from catching the balls? Does the checkerboard endzone emanate super-physical-micro-radio-waves that prevents a football from being thrown straight? Does the flowing Tennessee river impart a hydro-pull effect that allows men clad in orange jerseys to run 3 miles per hour faster than the men dressed in other shades….but said hydro-pull only works if the running back acquires the ball behind the line of scrimmage? Is a special radioactive smoke cloud sent over from ORNL and dropped on Neyland during game days, which temporarily blinds the opposing team’s defensive players as soon as the ball is given to a running back behind the line of scrimmage?
by kidbourbon on Jul 1, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All valid arguments!
Official MCM Hater!
"I'm a professional towel stomper...I've seen the big Ben Roethlisberger sandwich on TV"
by gramsey712 on Jul 2, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or perhaps you are using the ever effective technique of...
argument by way of statistically insignificant sample size. I have read papers on that. Brilliant!
by kidbourbon on Jul 1, 2009 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WIthout looking back at the games, it might be inversion too.
The problem with the “run to win” adage is that the run-heavy stats you see in a lot of winning scenarios come when a team is running to kill the clock and protect a lead rather than to establish a lead. In the games that UT won, were they nursing leads and inflating their rush tallies? Conversely, in the games UT lost, were they going pass-happy at the end in an effort to catch up?
I have no problem with wanting more rushing out of the team. (I champion the Single Wing after all…) But I’d really like to know the conditions of those games before declaring causality (for lack of a better word).
by Hooper on Jul 2, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great post +1
But now I need another 8 sessions of counseling. Just when I’d finally put the pain of the Clawfense behind me…
by memphispete on Jul 4, 2009 5:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














