The SEC's Media Policy Isn't That Big a Deal
So while the SEC's new policy on media certainly seems rather Draconian on its own merits, it's more than likely that nearly everyone here won't ever deal with it. Joel and hooper have pretty heavily alluded to it already with their first volley on the subject, but here's the thing: even with the policy parts that directly relate to ticket holders, this policy isn't created to stop fans from enjoying the game at the game. Honestly, it reads to me like it's not even about the fans.
On a related note, I suspect the SEC's rather harsh limitations on what they will and won't term full-time media will be rescinded, possibly after this season. Quite frankly, the first major paper in the Southeast that has to go to a part-time reporter covering the SEC will pretty much end this. (For example, I can't think the folks in Starkville or Tuscaloosa will be too happy wiith only part-time Mississippi State or Alabama coverage.) In the meantime, we'll lose out on new sources of writing and opinions, provided those with part-time access just don't turn to internet media and/or blogs entirely. For myself, this actually won't change how I obtain the majority of my information, since I'm currently at least partly reliant on other people screening links to find articles that I'd find interesting; I suspect I'm not the only one who falls into that category. In the meantime, this rule will funnel information through the major sports media outlets - CBS, ESPN, FOX, etc. - which really isn't that much different than the way things are now, provided you don't live in the Southeast (which I don't; keep in mind this is the perspective of a partial outsider).
Sadly, the ticket rule prohibits those awesome psuedo air-raid sirens that have gotten popular at soccer games over the last few months - fortunately, Texas can still use them to produce something like crowd noise, although I'll forgive them if they're unfamiliar with that too. Other than that, there's really not that much that changes with the new rules from a practical standpoint; as long as you aren't a complete idiot about it (i.e., standing on your friend's shoulders to take a clear pic of the new scoreboard) you'll likely be fine. Given the relative slow-moving mass as it relates to actually tracking new media (read: Twitter), there's no practical way they can even check to see if people are uploading news items, pictures, videos, etc. unless they also have agreements with cell phone carriers they're not telling anyone about - and I doubt they care that much. Again, the worst thing that'll happen is that you get kicked out of a game, which sucks but isn't the end of the world.
At the end of the day, the SEC's just trying to steer how their games are transmitted. There really isn't much in there that will functionally prohibit anything that's going on now for 99.5% of people; it's just defined better. Small media kind of takes it in the shorts here, but a) I suppose that's the price they pay for ESPN's machine and b) small media is nimble - they can get around it much faster than larger outlets can. As for the rest of us, we'll be fine.
FanPosts are most often submitted by users. The views and opinions expressed in FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions held by the editorial staff of Rocky Top Talk or SB Nation.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
My one question is: how far do they actually intend to enforce this?
And if it’s not as big of a deal as the language implies, then why is the language so severe?
Some of the items, like the ‘salaried, full-time’ journalist standard, are very rigid and restrictive. There isn’t any room for interpretation on that. But if they allow part-time journalists to get media creds, what does that say about their intent with the contract?
I honestly don’t think this is about creating an understanding between them and the media/ticketholders; I think this is about giving them license to enforce whatever policy they want to enforce at the time.
So what do they want to enforce? And what will they want to enforce in the future?
by Hooper on Aug 11, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It'll be, in essence, whatever they want it to be.
However, I doubt they’re going to go truly gung-ho on it. I see this going down a lot like the record companies’ “crusade” against MP3s as a worst-case scenario; they have the book written so they can throw it at people, but that darn thing is heavy. I don’t think they’ll use it too often for that reason.
Eric Berry for sending the guy who wins the Heisman spinning 720 degrees in the air at the podium - or for intercepting it and returning it to where it rightfully belongs
by Graysnail on Aug 12, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wish UT would embrace the bloggers
we’d be seen as progressive, cutting edge, and all the things Kiffin is…
by memphispete on Aug 11, 2009 6:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you may be off base on this one
I think this is ESPN disguised as an improvement….at its very best…at its worst, its a constitutional violation……
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Aug 11, 2009 7:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I actually think you are right, btw
It reeks of ESPN protecting its content.
by memphispete on Aug 11, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although I don't agree with it, it wouldn't be a 'constitutional violation'.
The first amendment reads:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Sports governing bodies, despite their illusions of grandeur, are not Congress.
Personally? I’ll be taking pictures, videos, and posting to Twitter and daring the geriatric ushers to do something about it.
by danmarcel on Aug 11, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But isnt there something in there about no entity being able to make
anyone live by any rule that violates the founding principles of the nation….or something to that effect By this I assume that they would want the ability to take someone to civil court should they choose to do so. Otherwise, if there is no financial consequence, there is really nothing there.
Remember, we're having fun now!!!
by ALLBLUCAT on Aug 12, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This could be ESPN protecting its content through the SEC, too.
I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case. If that’s so, then it’ll depend on what ESPN views as intrusive – and in that case, if you’re going to take video, make sure the quality of the video isn’t great. That’s not nearly as much of a threat as the guy who sneaks a nice pocket camcorder into the 4th row. That would be a big deal – 99% of ticketholders won’t be able to produce content that would even come close to matching ESPN’s product, though.
The media, on the other hand…. That’s a different story. But it seems the SEC already figured that out.
Eric Berry for sending the guy who wins the Heisman spinning 720 degrees in the air at the podium - or for intercepting it and returning it to where it rightfully belongs
by Graysnail on Aug 12, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're promising 'tweaks' now.
Though they’re only talking media-side, not ticket-side changes.
by Hooper on Aug 11, 2009 7:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not surprised at this:
“A clause that states a media member must be a “full-time salaried employee” will definitely be changed, Bloom said. “We’re dealing in a world with stringers and college media,” he said."
That’s one wall down. On the other hand, that link is at least blessedly open about the intent of the restrictions to drive traffic to school sites – and it sounds like this is more of an issue for practices, not games. Under that light, these restrictions make sense – and can be enforced on a ticketer level.
Eric Berry for sending the guy who wins the Heisman spinning 720 degrees in the air at the podium - or for intercepting it and returning it to where it rightfully belongs
by Graysnail on Aug 12, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Local media getting up in arms about it
Of course comes chock full of Big Blue dreams and Big Blue-colored glasses.
RIP Steve McNair (1973 - 2009) Retire #9!
Member of the Committee to Keep Keith Bulluck.
Eric Berry for Heisman!!
by Pride of the Southland on Aug 12, 2009 11:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whoops.
RIP Steve McNair (1973 - 2009) Retire #9!
Member of the Committee to Keep Keith Bulluck.
Eric Berry for Heisman!!
by Pride of the Southland on Aug 12, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This comments of that article
Are priceless. I want to know how this got slipped into the discussion about SEC Media Guides:
royalwithcheese you better watch that talk or you will be turned in to Obama. He will have your name on a list. Then when you have a health problem you will not get any treatment. I wonder if Republicans will receive same heath care treatment as Democrat’s
by bobo_the_vol on Aug 13, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have we thanked the commenters here recently for not being that stupidly non sequitur?
I see stuff like that and I realize just how easy we have it as moderators here. So, thanks all. For those of us who use sports as an escape from the seventh circle of politics, it’s much appreciated.
by Hooper on Aug 13, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can I request
That if we get some idiots like that at some point, they just get banned?
You, Joel, and Will all do a great job hookin’ me up with my Volunteer info, but a big reason I stay here is because I don’t have to shift through stupid comments.
by bobo_the_vol on Aug 13, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This.
Is so true. I feel like I can have an educated conversation here
RIP Steve McNair (1973 - 2009) Retire #9!
Member of the Committee to Keep Keith Bulluck.
Eric Berry for Heisman!!
by Pride of the Southland on Aug 13, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And then Joel gets involved.
/sigh
;)
by bobo_the_vol on Aug 14, 2009 5:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why I oughta . . .
. . . do the Talking Points.
Rocky Top Talk
by Joel on Aug 14, 2009 6:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that, after all the ribbing we've been giving you,
we ought to have ‘seen this coming’.
by Hooper on Aug 14, 2009 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why I oughta . . .
. . . do my laundry.
by bobo_the_vol on Aug 14, 2009 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















