Tennessee Vols Vs. Alabama Crimson Tide: Game Preview And Stat Comparison
A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons.
CAVEATS: You know the drill. Also, this: all of the following information is gleaned exclusively from the NCAA statistics and does not account for things like injuries, shared playing time, and other stuff difficult to see in the stats from a bird's eye view. As always, this is a long post, so I've put the conclusions and predictions before and after the meat. You're not seeing double.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Tennessee got beat by a Florida team that Alabama pretty much dominated. They scored three TDs and a field goal on their first four drives and were smoke monsters in the red zone on defense.
- Merely very good on offense, the Tide excels in almost every defensive stat category except sacks and tackles for loss. But they haven't played against UT's offensive line yet. Oh, and they're strong on punt and kickoff returns, too, so yay for that again.
- If there's any hope for the Vols, it will likely be because of turnovers -- which have so far been hopelessly devoted to Alabama, but which can also be quite fickle -- and because Tennessee's had a week to tweak and rest while Alabama will be playing its 8th consecutive game.
Predictions
- Alabama 31, Tennessee 13.
Schedule and Animated Drive Charts
![]() |
||||
| San Jose St. Spartans | 9/4/10 | win 48 - 3 | coverage | |
| Penn St. Nittany Lions | 9/11/10 | win 24 - 3 | coverage | |
| @ Duke Blue Devils | 9/18/10 | win 62 - 13 | coverage | |
| @ Arkansas Razorbacks | 9/25/10 | win 24 - 20 | coverage | |
| Florida Gators | 10/2/10 | win 31 - 6 | coverage | |
| @ South Carolina Gamecocks | 10/9/10 | loss 21 - 35 | coverage | |
| Mississippi Rebels | 10/16/10 | win 23 - 10 | coverage | |
I'm not going to put seven drive charts here, but you can watch/generate your own at this page. One, though, is particularly pertinent because it can be compared to our own game against the same opponent. Here's what Florida did to Tennessee:
And here's what Alabama did to Florida:
FULL SCREEN VERSION
Animated Drive Charts brought to you by Gameday Depot.
On offense against Florida, UT spent most of its time on the wrong side of the field, gave the ball away three times, but did manage to get two TD drives. Alabama? Three TDs and a field goal on its first four drives and zero turnovers. On defense against Florida, the Vols allowed four TDs, mostly on short drives thanks to field position, and benefited from two fumbles. The Crimson Tide D completely bowed up in the red zone, forcing two red zone turnovers (to go with two others) and otherwise holding the Gators to two field goals. Florida not getting a TD in a game must feel like suffocating to Gator fans.
National Unit Rankings
Now on to the national rankings.
| OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Offense | 37 | 183.57 | Air Force | 346.86 | 5 | Auburn | 283.71 |
| Passing Offense | 46 | 243.57 | Hawaii | 402.43 | 5 | Arkansas | 366.33 |
| Total Offense | 32 | 427.14 | Oregon | 567.00 | 4 | Auburn | 481.14 |
| Scoring Offense | 31 | 33.29 | Oregon | 54.33 | 3 | Auburn | 40.71 |
| Passing Efficiency | 6 | 167.99 | Boise St. | 188.11 | 2 | Auburn | 178.07 |
| Sacks Allowed | 105 | 3.00 | Boise St. | .17 | 11 | Kentucky | .86 |
Offensive observations. Apart from passing efficiency, Alabama's offensive stats aren't exactly what you'd expect from a team still threatening to repeat as national champion. They're basically leading the second fourth of teams nationally, and they're actually bad at allowing sacks.
| DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Defense | 19 | 106.86 | Boise St. | 59.33 | 5 | LSU | 83.57 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 5 | 97.89 | Nebraska | 80.41 | 1 | Alabama | 97.89 |
| Total Defense | 11 | 288.00 | Boise St. | 210.17 | 2 | LSU | 242.14 |
| Scoring Defense | 5 | 12.86 | TCU | 9.29 | 1 | Alabama | 12.86 |
| Pass Defense | 25 | 181.14 | Nebraska | 117.00 | 4 | LSU | 158.57 |
| Sacks | 104 | 1.14 | Florida St. | 4.29 | 12 | South Carolina | 3.67 |
| Tackles For Loss | 96 | 4.57 | Miami (FL) | 9.50 | 12 | Vanderbilt | 7.50 |
Defensive observations. Of course, we and our computer know that defense wins championships, and the Tide is still strong on that side of the ball. Fifth in both pass efficiency and scoring defense and in the top 20 in both rushing and total defense. Again, though, they're actually not good right along the line, ranking very low in their ability to generate problems for the offense behind the line of scrimmage.
| SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Net Punting | 66 | 36.32 | Pittsburgh | 44.83 | 8 | Florida | 44.55 |
| Punt Returns | 12 | 14.50 | Maryland | 24.61 | 3 | Mississippi | 21.40 |
| Kickoff Returns | 11 | 26.58 | Utah | 29.21 | 2 | Florida | 26.68 |
| Turnover Margin | 10 | 1.00 | Army | 1.57 | 1 | Alabama | 1.00 |
Special teams and turnovers observations. Hmm. Maybe the reason Tennessee's allowed so many punt and kickoff returns for TDs over the past several years is because every team we play has good punt and kick returners. Alabama's no exception, ranking just outside of the top 10 in both categories. The turnover margin ranking is just unfair on top of everything else, but does provide a slight glimmer of hope. If any of that is luck, and if the luck switches jerseys, well, that could be good news.
Stastical Comparison
Here's how the teams looked when the RTT BlogPoll Computery Thing chewed them up and spit them out.
| R | Team | WL | SOS | PED | RD | 3DO | TD | PEO | OP PG |
TO | 3DD | BP |
| 9 | ![]() |
11 | 46 | 5 | 19 | 33 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 32 | 18 | 108.63 |
| 90 | ![]() |
83 | 21 | 43 | 67 | 114 | 78 | 68 | 75 | 97 | 57 | -46.62 |
Yay for having a harder schedule! Or not!
Players to watch for
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| OFFENSE | |||
| Rushing | Trent Richardson | 63 | 69.57 |
| Eddie Lacy | 29.14 | ||
| Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) | Greg McElroy | 6 | 168.97 |
| Total Offense | Greg McElroy | 59 | 217.57 |
| Trent Richardson | 69.57 | ||
| Receptions Per Game | Julio Jones | T-61 | 4.71 |
| Receiving Yards Per Game | Julio Jones | 71 | 64.00 |
| Darius Hanks | 41.29 | ||
| Scoring | Trent Richardson | 6.00 | |
| Jeremy Shelley | 5.86 | ||
| DEFENSE | |||
| Interceptions | Robert Lester | T-9 | .57 |
| Dre Kirkpatrick | T-35 | .43 | |
| Will Lowery | .29 | ||
| Mark Barron | .29 | ||
| Nico Johnson | .17 | ||
| Sacks | |||
| Tackles | Mark Barron | 6.71 | |
| Tackles For Loss | Courtney Upshaw | .93 | |
| SPECIAL TEAMS | |||
| Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game) | |||
| Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Marquis Maze | 5 | 18.70 |
| Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Trent Richardson | 21 | 27.80 |
| Field Goals | Cade Foster | T-70 | .86 |
| Jeremy Shelley | T-70 | .86 | |
| All-Purpose Runners | Trent Richardson | 3 | 183.14 |
| Julio Jones | 78.14 | ||
Observations
Offense.
Quarterback. Hey, did you know that Alabama quarterback Greg McElroy hasn't ever lost a game EVER NOT EVEN TIC TAC TOE EVEREVER? Until two weeks ago, which we'll just add as a footnote to the original statement because doing otherwise would require actually deleting old notes chiseled onto stone tablets and that would take effort, man. Oh, and hey, in not unrelated news, McElroy is an incredibly efficient passer.
Receivers. Julio Jones is, of course, McElroy's go-to guy, but he's not exactly setting the world on fire, averaging only 4.71 catches and 64 yards per game. He played against Ole Miss last week despite having surgery on his hand, but aggravated the thing early and didn't return. Nick Saban said he could have played in the second half, but didn't, so we should expect to see him Saturday. How effective he'll be, we can't know. The No. 2 receiver appears to be Darius Hanks.
Running backs. You'd expect the returning Heisman Trophy winner to show up on that chart above, but Mark Ingram is nowhere to be found. And it's not like he hasn't played enough games. After sitting out the first two, he's played in the last five. That's the good news. The bad news is that Trent Richardson may be even better, and they're both playing well. Richardson is averaging only 70 yards per game, though.
Defense. Watch out for sophomore DB Robert Lester, who's tied for 9th nationally in interceptions with an average of .57 per game. Fellow sophomore Dre Kirkpatrick isn't that far behind him -- tied for 35th with an average of .43. Add those up, and you get a nice even 1.0 interceptions per game from the twoathem. And then there's Will Lowery, Mark Barron, and Nico Johnson, who've all written their names in the interception lights as well.
Notice that Sacks category. No names. Matt Simms approves. Courtney Upshaw looks to be the only guy who threatens opponents' backfields, although it should be noted that they haven't played our offensive line yet.
DB Mark Barron is the Tide's best tackler, but he's unranked nationally and is averaging only 6.71 tackles per game.
Special teams. Eric Berry should have hit Marquis Maze harder, as he's returned from orbit to become the nation's 5th-best punt returner. Do not kick to this man, or, in the alternative, pretend he's that dude from LSU who was Awesome But Shut Down by the Vols. Trent Richardson returns kickoffs, which is not fair.
Head to Head Comparisons
How'd we do with the head-to-head comparisons during Georgia week? Mostly FAIL.
| Prediction | Result | Grade | |
| UT rush | 120 | 9 | EPIC FAIL (in a very bad way) |
| UT pass | 180 | 260 | FAIL (but in a good way!) |
| Georgia rush | 140 | 136 | WIN |
| Georgia pass | 200 | 266 | EH |
| UT score | 21 | 14 | OPTIMISM FAIL |
| Georgia score | 24 | 41 | EPIC FAIL |
So let's see if we can be any more accurate this week:
![]() |
![]() |
Best Comparable(s)
|
Result Against Best Comparable
|
Prediction
|
|
| UT rush v. Alabama rush defense | 115 (#94) |
107 (#19) |
Georgia (103) (#16) |
9 | 50 |
| UT pass v. Alabama pass defense | 207 (#71) |
181 (#25) |
Georgia |
260 | 240 |
| Alabama rush v. UT rush defense | 154 (#67) |
184 (#37) |
UAB (179) (#38) |
115 | 120 |
| Alabama pass v. UT pass defense | 228 (#81) |
244 (#46) |
UAB (244) (T-#44) |
429 | 290 |
| UT scoring offense v. Alabama scoring defense | 23 (#84) |
13 (#5) |
LSU (14) (#11) |
14 | 13 |
| Alabama scoring offense v. UT scoring defense | 28 (#75) |
33 (#31) |
Georgia (30) (#51) |
41 | 31 |
As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations. The general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.
This week's example: Tennessee's averaging 115 yards on the ground. Alabama gives up an average of 107 rushing yards. So we'll get between 107 and 115, right? Not quite. Georgia's average is actually a little bit better than 'Bama's (you're welcome!), and against them we got only 9. So we'll get 9, right? Hold on, what's the hurry, son? The next best comps are LSU (84 yards) and Oregon (127 yards), and against them we got 96 and 182 yards, respectively. Factor in UT's bye week and that this will be Alabama's 8th game in a row, and I'm guessing 50 yards. Still bad, but not 9 yards bad.
Overall, there's really just no good way to look at this unless you give great weight to Tennessee's bye week, the fact that Alabama hasn't had a break since the beginning of the season, and the fact that Dooley has committed to getting a different QB some snaps to try to breathe some life into the offense. Still, it's shaping up to be not necessarily a blowout of storied proportions, but a dominating win the the Tide.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Tennessee got beat by a Florida team that Alabama pretty much dominated. They scored three TDs and a field goal on their first four drives and were smoke monsters in the red zone on defense.
- Merely very good on offense, the Tide excels in almost every defensive stat category except sacks and tackles for loss. But they haven't played against UT's offensive line yet. Oh, and they're strong on punt and kickoff returns, too, so yay for that again.
- If there's any hope for the Vols, it will likely be because of turnovers -- which have so far been hopelessly devoted to Alabama, but which can also be quite fickle -- and because Tennessee's had a week to tweak and rest while Alabama will be playing its 8th consecutive game.
Predictions
- Alabama 31, Tennessee 13.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm
Hadn’t actually thought of it that way, but yeah. If turnovers change colors, though, we’ll have a shot.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Oct 19, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Not to toot my own horn
But methinks I have a future in Vegas :)
http://www.rockytoptalk.com/2010/10/16/1755141/gameday-open-thread-for-vol-fans#49537373
Again, Joel is 4-0 at our losses.
I blame him. He’s got the goat donkey mule thing.
______________________________________________
I will give my North Carolina for Tennessee Today. Apparently.
The numbers say what I predicted, but I actually feel a bit better about the opportunity in this game than the prediction indicates. I don’t really want to be on record on the front page as giving too much weight to UT’s bye and ’Bama’s long stretch of games, but I honestly think that will play into it and may even result in hustle/fundamental factors, which could show up in turnovers. Hoping, anyway. There’s a chance.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Oct 19, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
The way I see it
The SOS basically cancels out the Tide’s advantage in every other category. Right? right….?
Bring it across, shape it down
Baring massive collapse via TO, complete disinterest, or rare kindness by Saban to his protege, Bama wins bigger than 31-13.
Specifically, their yardage totals on the ground should be over 200. We have not shown great ability to tackle and our thin D line is susceptible to having their 300+ pounders run us clean over. If Saban throws a pass, it’s to keep us honest by not putting 11 in the box and to keep his all-world receiver awake. But Richardson and a Heisman winner behind that line should make this a boring, but thorough, whipping.
Off-color quote from Semi-Tough, which is a classic football book along the lines of Blazing Saddles and definitely NSFW (or kids) – “It’s our job to run the ball up their [Fulmerized]. And it’s their job to get their hands dirty getting it out.” That pretty much sums up Saban’s offensive philosophy in this game.
The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
turnovers are not something to really hang your hopes on...
last year alabama had an amazingly good turnover margin that the pundits insisted was unsustainable. we looked at it a bit more in detail over the off-season and found that things weren’t exactly cut and dried in regards to that. two weeks ago i revisited the issue and found that the tide are doing pretty much the same thing this season.
that said, this breakdown is a superb dissection of the tide’s weaknesses which we’ve been outlining every week this season over at roll bama roll. the breakdown of the ole miss victory should give a nice representative sample if you are interested.
the fact is, there a lot of things in the volunteers favor here. alabama’s offense is in its mid-season slump, the defense is very much a work in progress and injuries are really taking their toll. add to that tennessee is coming off a bye week and playing at home the edge would seem to be clearly there for tennessee.
as t. kyle king noted over at dawg sports “this [alabama] team is a shadow of its former self. however, that former self was so inconceivably good that even its shadow ranks in the top three in the SEC.”
is that disparity over a reeling and rebuilding tennessee squad enough? we shall see…
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
We're sticking to our optimism, thank you very much. ;-)
We all know it’s not likely. The 17ish point line isn’t there because Vegas is making a mistake, after all. But at the same time, that won’t stop us from looking for the ways an upset might actually happen.
And as far as turnovers go, it’s a lot easier to separate fumbles from interceptions. There is a skill to causing fumbles, but not to recovering them (well, at least from a statistical sense). There is a definite skill to interceptions, as well as a schematic method about maximizing your chances at them. Your odds go up when your blitz is as effective as Alabama’s has been, as the defensive backs know they won’t have to defend routes for very long and can anticipate the timing of the throw.
I usually don’t listen to pundits on turnovers because they lump them all together. That’s just not effective for analysis.
by David Hooper on Oct 20, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions
and that's pretty much what we found when we examined the numbers
as much bad mouthing as mcelroy is getting for his lack of a vertical game and propensity to take a sack, he doesn’t throw that many interceptions. while ingram and richardson aren’t any more likely to fumble the ball. there is a skill to causing fumbles (and interceptions) but there is also a skill in preventing them.
once those factors are minimized the key for alabama’s turnover margin is the propensity of the secondary to get interceptions. this, it seems, is a result of the type of defense saban utilizes and the manner he employs the secondary in the scheme. in fact one of the problems that seems to be afflicting this group is that it is somewhat dependent on such turnovers to do the job (whereas last year’s squad was better at forcing opposing teams to punt the ball)
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
Great article/analysis
Unfortunately for us, if you have managed to uncover our weaknesses, I’m pretty sure your coaches have also. As Kleph stated above, we (the Bama fans) are pretty much on it as well, so it appears our dirty laundry has been strewn all over the interstate for everyone to see. We have tons of talent and great coaches, but unless they’ve managed to come up with a syringe that holds ‘experience’ we will have to allow the kinks to be worked out. You mix that with a rivalry game, on the road in a hostile stadium, and the fact the injury bug found it’s way back to T-town, well… I need to go take a drink now…
I’ve been watching Bama-UT games for quite a while and one thing that I’ve learned is this…. No matter what the stats/analysis/paper says about the game (NOT taking away from what you’ve written above), once Bama and UT hit the field and start smacking each other in the facemask, all bets are off. I humbly reference last year’s game as Exhibit A. I expect nothing different this Saturday.
Off topic: My brother, a couple of friends, and myself are heading up to Neyland on Saturday and wanted to know where the best place to park near/around the stadium would be?
Back on Topic: Good luck to you guys on Saturday (but with a Bama win of course) and here’s to a great game! RTR!
"I have tried to teach them to show class, to have pride, and to display character. I think football, winning games, takes care of itself if you do that." -Paul W. Bryant

by 

























