Tennessee Vols At South Carolina Gamecocks Game Preview And Stat Comparison
A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons.
CAVEATS: You know the drill. Also, this: all of the following information is gleaned exclusively from the NCAA statistics and does not account for things like injuries, shared playing time, and other stuff difficult to see in the stats from a bird's eye view. As always, this is a long post, so I've put the conclusions and predictions before and after the meat. You're not seeing double.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Much like Alabama, South Carolina has a pick-your-poison offense. They have a world-class receiver in Alshon Jeffery and a running back in Marcus Lattimore who looks to be world-class at times as well. If Tennessee employs the same game plan as it did against Alabama (focus more on stopping the RBs), expect the Gamecocks to have something like the same success with Jeffery that 'Bama did with Julio Jones. I'd expect Tennessee, however, to focus more on stopping Garcia and Jeffery this week, though, for a couple of reasons. First, they've been a bit more consistent than has Lattimore. Second, Tennessee shouldn't want to die the same way twice in consecutive weeks. Still, if that happens, expect Lattimore to have a big week. One or the other should be acceptable, but allowing both to have great success would not be good.
- Brace yourself for sacks and general havoc in Tennessee's backfield. South Carolina ranks 5th in the nation in sacks, and the Vols rank 113th in sacks allowed. Three of the Gamecocks' defensive linemen rank nationally in sacks, tackles for loss, or both.
- If Tennessee has an advantage, it's in special teams. Imagine that.
Predictions
- South Carolina 31, Tennessee 20. Sorry. Again.
Schedule and Animated Drive Charts
![]() |
||||
| Southern Miss. Golden Eagles | 9/2/10 | win 41 - 13 | coverage | |
| Georgia Bulldogs | 9/11/10 | win 17 - 6 | coverage | |
| Furman Paladins | 9/18/10 | win 38 - 19 | coverage | |
| @ Auburn Tigers | 9/25/10 | loss 27 - 35 | coverage | |
| Alabama Crimson Tide | 10/9/10 | win 35 - 21 | coverage | |
| @ Kentucky Wildcats | 10/16/10 | loss 28 - 31 | coverage | |
| @ Vanderbilt Commodores | 10/23/10 | win 21 - 7 | coverage | |
Let's take a quick look at the drive charts for our games against Georgia and Alabama.
FULL SCREEN VERSION
Animated Drive Charts brought to you by Gameday Depot.
Georgia scored 41 points against Tennessee and only 6 against South Carolina. I do think that those were two entirely different Georgia teams, but still.
The Gamecocks did pretty much what they wanted on offense against Alabama's D. Tennessee, not exactly. They also limited the Tide to two TDs and a couple of field goals where Tennessee hung with them for a half before getting rolled after the break.
National Unit Rankings
Now on to the national rankings.
| OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Offense | 70 | 143.29 | Air Force | 326.50 | 9 | Auburn | 303.25 |
| Passing Offense | 31 | 260.71 | Hawaii | 400.75 | 3 | Arkansas | 352.14 |
| Total Offense | 46 | 404.00 | Oregon | 569.14 | 6 | Auburn | 486.75 |
| Scoring Offense | 53 | 29.57 | Oregon | 55.14 | 7 | Auburn | 38.63 |
| Passing Efficiency | 7 | 163.61 | Boise St. | 188.11 | 3 | Auburn | 170.45 |
| Sacks Allowed | 91 | 2.57 | Boise St. | .17 | 10 | Mississippi | 1.00 |
Offensive observations. If you've seen Marcus Lattimore run this season, you're probably going "huh?" right along with me at that 70th-ranked rushing offense. He's played in every game but the last one, and, with the exception of going for 187 against Georgia, he's been held under 100 yards per game. Several games just under, but still. The team's passing efficiency is top ten, but the other offensive stats are just pretty good. They do allow a lot of sacks.
| DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Defense | 13 | 101.29 | Boise St. | 59.33 | 2 | Georgia | 99.25 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 92 | 139.90 | Miami (FL) | 87.73 | 10 | Alabama | 94.31 |
| Total Defense | 52 | 353.71 | Boise St. | 210.17 | 8 | LSU | 277.63 |
| Scoring Defense | 27 | 18.86 | TCU | 9.00 | 5 | Alabama | 12.50 |
| Pass Defense | 104 | 252.43 | TCU | 117.88 | 12 | LSU | 149.50 |
| Sacks | 5 | 3.43 | Florida St. | 4.29 | 1 | South Carolina | 3.43 |
| Tackles For Loss | 24 | 7.00 | Kent St. | 9.71 | 5 | Arkansas | 7.86 |
Defensive observations. Here's an uh-oh stat: The Gamecocks are 5th in the nation in sacks and the Vols are 113th in sacks allowed. That might actually tell the entire story when Tennessee has the ball, but they're solid against the run, too. Not so good against the pass, which balances things out a bit for that all important total defense category. But they're stingy with the end and red zones, ranking 27th in scoring defense despite a middle-of-the-road total defense.
| SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Net Punting | 60 | 36.73 | Florida | 44.55 | 8 | Florida | 44.55 |
| Punt Returns | 112 | 3.58 | Maryland | 23.24 | 12 | Mississippi | 20.63 |
| Kickoff Returns | 83 | 20.74 | Kansas St. | 29.04 | 9 | Florida | 26.68 |
| Turnover Margin | 101 | -.86 | Oregon | 1.71 | 12 | Alabama | 1.13 |
Special teams and turnovers observations. Oh, look. Punt returns and kickoff returns of 112th and 83rd, respectively. Woo for that. They're also not doing well in net punting or turnovers, so there are some intangibles to hang hopes on.
Stastical Comparison
Here's how the teams looked when the RTT BlogPoll Computery Thing chewed them up and spit them out.
| R | Team | WL | SOS | PED | RD | 3DO | TD | PEO | OPPG | TO | 3DD |
| 23 | ![]() |
25 | 22 | 92 | 13 | 5 | 52 | 7 | 27 | 46 | 68 |
| 90 | ![]() |
90 | 13 | 57 | 75 | 115 | 88 | 92 | 83 | 95 | 69 |
Sort of what you'd expect, except that Tennessee actually ranks better in pass efficiency defense and has compiled its numbers against a marginally stronger schedule. In all of the other categories, though, South Carolina ranks well ahead of the Vols.
Players to watch for
Observations
Offense.
Quarterback. Stephen Garcia is 5th in the nation with a 170.23 pass efficiency rating, and he's 40th in total offense. Much of that is no doubt due to Alshon Jeffery . . .
Receivers. Jeffery is an absolute beast, and his numbers prove it: 13th in the nation in receptions per game and 3rd in receiving yards per game. He and Spurrier and Garcia will no doubt seek to do to Tennessee what Julio Jones and Saban and McElroy did, if the Vols employ the same game plan. Who knows, because the challenge is essentially the same: stop both a fantastic passing game and a fantastic running game. Tori Gurley, by the way, also ranks nationally (83rd) in receptions per game.
Running backs. Marcus Lattimore ranks 37th nationally in rushing, averaging nearly 90 yards per game, and he's tied for 3rd in the nation in scoring. When he was out last week against Vanderbilt, Brian Maddox got 146. All of that makes that team rushing offense that ranks merely 70th perplexing. Maybe they're just not getting him the ball enough. This is Steve Spurrier we're talking about here. Lattimore's supposed to play Saturday, by the way.
Defense. The guys to watch out for here are DLs Devin Taylor, Melvin Ingram, and Travian Robertson. Taylor ranks 15th in sacks and 23rd in tackles for loss, Ingram ranks 46th in sacks, and Robertson ranks 88th in tackles for loss. Note, too, that these guys are all defensive linemen and will be lining up against Tennessee's offensive line.
Special teams. Spencer Lanning is having a solid year as punter for the Gamecocks. Other than that, though, special teams isn't South Carolina's strength.
Head to Head Comparisons
How'd we do with the head-to-head comparisons during Alabama week? Not great, although we weren't off too much on Alabama's passing and Tennessee's score.
| Prediction | Result | |
| UT rush | 50 | 159 |
| UT pass | 240 | 156 |
| Alabama rush | 120 | 210 |
| Alabama pass | 290 | 326 |
| UT score | 13 | 10 |
| Alabama score | 31 | 41 |
So let's see if we can be any more accurate this week:
![]() |
![]() |
Best Comparable(s)
|
Result Against Best Comp
|
Prediction
|
|
| UT rush v. South Carolina rush defense | 121.29 (#91) |
101.29 (#13) |
Georgia/Alabama (99.25/113.38) (#12/#21) |
9/159 | 90 |
| UT pass v. South Carolina pass defense | 199.57 (#74) |
252.43 (#104) |
UAB/Georgia (219.86/207.50) (#71/#57) |
245/260 | 280 |
| South Carolina rush v. UT rush defense | 161.57 (#75) |
143.29 (#70) |
Florida/Georgia (142.14/153.75) (#74/#58) |
150/136 | 150 |
| South Carolina pass v. UT pass defense | 241.57 (#95) |
260.71 (T-#31) |
Oregon/Alabama (260.71/253.88) (T-#31/37) |
202/326 | 240 |
| UT scoring offense v. South Carolina scoring defense | 21.43 (#94) |
18.86 (#27) |
Florida/Georgia (18.71/19.13) (#26/#30) |
17/14 | 20 |
| South Carolina scoring offense v. UT scoring defense | 29.43 (#83) |
29.57 (#53) |
Florida/Georgia (27.57/31.50) (#62/#39) |
31/41 | 31 |
As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations. The general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.
This week's example: Tennessee is averaging 21.43 points per game. South Carolina is holding opponents to an average of 18.86, which is one spot behind Florida and three spots ahead of Georgia. Against Florida and Georgia, Tennessee scored 17 and 14 points. The turnovers and getting way behind early killed the Vols' game plan against Georgia, and the yardage stats are closer than I expected them to be, so I bumped the prediction for UT's score up to 20. It may be optimistic, as we haven't scored more than 14 points in the last three games, but it's my best guess.
Overall, I think the line's a little high on this one. If you just look at the scores, you'd want to say that the Gamecocks should win 34 or more to 17 or so. But the yardage stats are much closer, so I bumped UT up a bit and SC down a bit.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Much like Alabama, South Carolina has a pick-your-poison offense. They have a world-class receiver in Alshon Jeffery and a running back in Marcus Lattimore who looks to be world-class at times as well. If Tennessee employs the same game plan as it did against Alabama (focus more on stopping the RBs), expect the Gamecocks to have something like the same success with Jeffery that 'Bama did with Julio Jones. I'd expect Tennessee, however, to focus more on stopping Garcia and Jeffery this week, though, for a couple of reasons. First, they've been a bit more consistent than has Lattimore. Second, Tennessee shouldn't want to die the same way twice in consecutive weeks. Still, if that happens, expect Lattimore to have a big week. One or the other should be acceptable, but allowing both to have great success would not be good.
- Brace yourself for sacks and general havoc in Tennessee's backfield. South Carolina ranks 5th in the nation in sacks, and the Vols rank 113th in sacks allowed. Three of the Gamecocks' defensive linemen rank nationally in sacks, tackles for loss, or both.
- If Tennessee has an advantage, it's in special teams. Imagine that.
Predictions
- South Carolina 31, Tennessee 20. Sorry. Again.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I will bet against 20 points for the Vols, right now.
With only Tyler Bray likely to play, against a stout defense at SC, I will be stunned if we score 2 TDs and 2 FGs.
That being said, please, please, please prove me wrong.
The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
I'd go for that as well, because it meant that the defense stopped someone. ;)
The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
3rd-and-7 from the South Carolina 15.
Ball is snapped way over Garcia’s head and out of the end zone. Technically, it’s stopping them, right?
Simulated Gameday Experience - just like the real thing, only we have smoke machines.
by Chris Pendley on Oct 27, 2010 7:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Helping them shoot themselves in the foot. Yeah, I'd go for that.
The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
Re: Special teams
The improvement on special teams this year is very gratifying. With a limited number of plays available, plus being able to get the most talented athletes from both sides of the ball involved, I think it was reasonable to expect improvement in that area quicker than you would expect from the offense (second year in the system, and absolutely gutted on the offense line) or the defense (first year in the system, gutted on the line, and shaky in the secondary). Daniel Lincoln’s injury is hurting us on place kicking, but I think Palardy will be a fine kicker as time goes by.
This is actually one of the things that gives me hope for the future
1. Special teams was a big problem identified by the coaching staff, and we’ve seen wild improvement. This is the third staff in a row who’s promised and the first who’s delivered.
2. Despite not counting to 11, we’re the least penalized team in the conference.
3. The first halves have still been competitive, depleted roster (which may explain the second halves) and all.
When I see that we haven’t improved a whole lot over the course of the season and that we still can’t get the right number of people on the field, those three things give me hope.
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 26, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions
As for lack of improvement and counting issues
I think injuries go a long way in explaining the first, and maybe even the second. It would take an improvement on both sides of the ball of biblical proportions to be able to counteract the attrition we’ve had due to injury. Plus, with the shuffling around we have to do to find live bodies to plug in, I bet that exacerbates the “X men on the field” issue, combined with youth at all positions. I think it’s telling that the substitution problems, IIRC, have all or mostly all been on defense, which in addition to its youth is also in its first year in the system.
You're right
They were all on defense. I hadn’t thought about that. But yeah, I agree. But even with injuries, lack of improvement and substitution errors are worrying. Those are just three things I look at to remind myself that we have reason to think the worries will go away.
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 26, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Also
We may have a bit of a ‘shark attack’ pattern going on here. Kind of like when the media went shark attack crazy a few years ago, and it seemed like there were more, when in reality shark attacks were down. Because we had a substitution error at a horrible time (end of the game, and it led to a loss) and a little more serious than usual (13 players? Really?) we are more apt as a fan base to notice a 12 men on the field than we would be otherwise. For a more relevant analogy, take Arian Foster’s fumbles; he didn’t really fumble more than any other back on average, but the timing (it always seemed to be on the goal line during a close game) and the surrounding atmosphere (the offense was truly wretched that year) made them seem worse.
Or a ten men on the field
which left Julio Jones uncovered. THAT one would have had me screaming at the TV if the game had been closer at that point.
That would have been worth calling the timeout
even if we didn’t have a timeout. The penalty would have been better.
by David Hooper on Oct 26, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I've almost given up trying to figure this team out and predict outcomes but I certainly like our chances better
this Saturday than I did last. Does that mean we will win? Probably not the way our luck has gone all season.
Nevertheless, you have to like our chances a little better:
1. We get Schofield back this week so shouldn’t our offensive line play improve some?
2. Hughes will be back to full strength again, so shouldn’t we see some improvement on the d line too?
3. Repeated beat downs and our game film could certainly lead the USC players to not taking game prep as seriously, right?
4. Could they be looking ahead to Arkansas? Probably a stretch since we’re a divisional foe, but looking at our game and the Arkansas game following it, which team would you be more worried about beating?
5. If we could somehow (I know this is asking for a lot) get some pressure on Garcia or get him to where he is trying to force a play, maybe we could see the bad-decision Garcia we all know and love show up. Has he had a really bad game yet this year? Nobody’s perfect all of the time.
Chief concerns for me:
1. Teague is listed as day to day with a turf toe injury so our secondary seems to be the greatest concern for us right now. I’m concerned that Jeffery still wants payback for Kiffin’s gas pumping comment even though the antagonist is gone now.
2. Simms is hobbled. Though he seems to make bad decisions sometimes, I feel like he’s our best shot just because he knows the offense better.
Pandemonium Reigns
by Pandemonium Reigns on Oct 26, 2010 2:28 PM EDT reply actions

by 


























