What Tennessee Is Doing Well And What It Needs To Work On
As we refocus on the process of becoming a good program again, I thought we'd take a quick look at the things the team is doing well and the things it needs to work on first. Starting with the silver lining, here's a list of things Tennessee's doing well:
| Categories In Which Tennessee Is In The Top Quarter |
|
| Category | Ranking |
| Fewest Yards Penalized Per Game | 7th |
| Kickoff Return Yardage Defense | 16th |
| Fumbles Lost | T-21st |
| Fewest Penalties Per Game | T-30th |
To me, that says that this is, in fact, a disciplined team, which is really quite an accomplishment considering its youth. Yeah, fans are rightfully screaming about the growing meme of the team's inability to get the right number of guys on the field, but the team is actually doing a good job of not giving away yards to the other team on penalties. Fumbles lost, too, I think is a sign of an emphasis on discipline by the coaches and that the players are responding. Also good is the improvement on at least one aspect of special teams: We're doing a good job of making teams start drives where they should after we score. If only we could kickoff more often.
Another silver lining: Below is a list of Tennessee players ranking in the top 50 of the national rankings, the guys who are doing more than their share to keep the team from tanking:
| Player | Ranking | Stat |
| Chad Cunningham | 27th | Punting |
| Nick Reveiz | 34th | Total Tackles |
| Marsalis Teague | 34th | Passes Defended |
| Tauren Poole | 44th | Rushing |
Yeah, our most nationally-noteworthy player is our punter. Hey, he's getting a lot of reps.
Now on to the list of things Tennessee really needs to work on because they're not doing them well at all. Brace.
|
Categories In Which Tennessee |
|
| Category | Ranking |
| Red Zone Efficiency | 116th |
| Offense Third Down Efficiency | 115th |
| Offense Fourth Down Efficiency | 114th |
| Pass Sacks Allowed | 113th |
| First Downs | 111th |
| Pass Sacks | 106th |
| Time Of Possession | 104th |
| Punt Returns | 104th |
| Tackles For Loss Allowed | 102nd |
| Kickoff Returns | 101st |
| Total Offense | 95th |
| Pass Defense | 95th |
| Scoring Offense | 94th |
| Passing Efficiency | 92nd |
| Rushing Offense | 91st |
The offense is just really struggling, as they are in the bottom quarter in 11 of 15 offensive categories kept by the NCAA. The categories the team isn't in the bottom fourth in? Passing offense, interceptions thrown, fumbles lost, and turnovers lost, which would seem to indicate that Matt Simms is helping the offense more than hurting it and that he's helping it more than most.
All of the deficiencies are probably interrelated and a result of a more general ineffectiveness, but note that they include a very poor showing in allowing sacks and tackles for loss, which are likely more the cause of the other problems than an effect of them. So, we're losing this season, as we expected, along the line. How does the coaching staff fix that? Coach up the current players as best they can, continue to get them the experience that will pay off down the road, and go and get some more players. All of which just takes time.
12 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yikes thats a struggling offense
However, when I watch this offense go on the field, I don’t get the completely helpless feeling I did when watching the Clawfense in ’08.
They’re struggling to be sure, but I at least get the sense that they’re all on the same page and are capable of putting some points on the board. Maybe its just perspective but in ’08 a first down felt like a miracle. This year I feel like we have an offense thats capable they just struggle up front.
Bring it across, shape it down
The struggles are in the red zone and on third down, generally
Not the completely pervasive ineptitude we had in ‘08. I think this team would beat the ’08 Vols handily, despite much less talent. If their record isn’t as good, it’s only because ’10 UK is better than ’08 UK. and ’10 Ole Miss is better than ’08 Mississippi State.
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 27, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
It all makes sense, certainly
Young offensive linemen combined with a lack of consistency along the line (due to injuries) explains a lot. Sacks and tackles for loss and low penalties says to me our line can’t hold their blocks but don’t hold to make up for it. Maybe getting Schofield back this week will help some. Ah, who am I kidding? Someone else will just get hurt.
Also, I had no idea Teague was doing that good. We’re really lucky to have that guy – he’s smart and a leader. Anybody know how his turf toe is?
Pandemonium Reigns
by Pandemonium Reigns on Oct 27, 2010 10:48 AM EDT reply actions
Our kick coverage being this good this year
is a small large miracle
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 27, 2010 11:59 AM EDT reply actions
I agree with the 2008 vs. 2010 comparison
The 2008 offense might have well just handed the ball off three times and then just punted. It was hopeless. How do you have the # 3 scoring defense in the Nation and go 5 – 7? You have our 2008 offense and Dave Clawson at the helm. Am I the only one who kind of smiles when I see Bowling Green struggle with this guy coaching.
With our 2010 offense, the issues at QB and O – Line are glaring but at least we move the ball a little. We have had a lot of drives just bog down on the opponents side of the field and we come away with no points. Matt Simms three red zone picks have also killed us this year. Poole has also run for over 100 yards each against three real teams.
I know I am a little delusional, but I just feel that we will play USC tough this weekend somehow.
Bowling Green is 1-7 and scored 6 points on 135 yards vs Kent State last week
BGSU is 111th in the nation in total offense at 294.3 ypg. We’re 95th at 320.9, and our competition is, you know, not the MAC.
The ‘08 Clawfense was 116th in offense at 268.8 per game. So yeah, we’re not nearly that bad right now, but Dave Clawson absolutely is.
by Will Shelton on Oct 27, 2010 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions
If '08 UT and '10 UT played a game, could you imagine the pre-game coin flip though?
Instead of the handshake, the captains would just look at each other, hug, and cry a little.
But for entirely different reasons.
by David Hooper on Oct 27, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Gotta admit, it'd be a game we couldn't stop watching.
In that ‘rubberneck at a car wreck’ sense.
But seriously, a fascinating matchup.
by David Hooper on Oct 27, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Just think of it this way: if you had to lay even money on it, which team would you bet would throw the first INT?
’08 Crompton vs. ’10 secondary, or ’10 Simms with ’08 secondary?
by David Hooper on Oct 27, 2010 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions

by 


























