A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons.
CAVEATS: You know the drill. Also, this: all of the following information is gleaned exclusively from the NCAA statistics and does not account for things like injuries, shared playing time, and other stuff difficult to see in the stats from a bird's eye view. As always, this is a long post, so I've put the conclusions and predictions before and after the meat. You're not seeing double.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Tennessee and Kentucky are fairly even on resume. Both have beaten Vandy, the difference in the game, as shown by the drive charts anyway, being that Kentucky finished strong and Tennessee didn't. Both teams also lost to Florida and Georgia. Kentucky beat South Carolina, who beat Tennessee, but Tennessee beat Ole Miss, who beat Kentucky. Got all that? Overall, Tennessee's played a fairly stronger schedule, so the stats should be viewed accordingly.
- Kentucky is mostly a top 25 team on offense. They feature the best passing offense Tennessee will have seen all season, and they rank right up there with Oregon and Alabama in several other offensive stats.
- On defense, the Wildcats are best at pass defense (12th in the nation), but they're vulnerable against the run (88th in the nation).
- Randall Cobb is a one man wrecking machine, but QB Mike Hartline is also very good. Cobb is a receiver who ranks second in the nation in all-purpose running. He leads the team and is ranked nationally in both receiving categories, leads the team and is ranked nationally in both kickoff and punt returns, and leads the team in rushing yards. He may be the guy who retrieves the tee on kickoffs, too, I don't know.
- The numbers favor Kentucky, but several things may work to Tennessee's advantage to deny the numbers their day. The Vols have played a better schedule, they have home field advantage on Senior Day, and they've been better able to win the turnover battle. And curses and streaks have ways of self-perpetuating. But they also have this nasty knack of coming to an end.
Predictions
- Kentucky 35, Tennessee 28. Apologies.
Schedule and Animated Drive Charts
![]() |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ Louisville Cardinals | 9/4/10 | win 23 - 16 | coverage | |
| Western Kentucky Hilltoppers | 9/11/10 | win 63 - 28 | coverage | |
| Akron Zips | 9/18/10 | win 47 - 10 | coverage | |
| @ Florida Gators | 9/25/10 | loss 14 - 48 | coverage | |
| @ Mississippi Rebels | 10/2/10 | loss 35 - 42 | coverage | |
| Auburn Tigers | 10/9/10 | loss 34 - 37 | coverage | |
| South Carolina Gamecocks | 10/16/10 | win 31 - 28 | coverage | |
| Georgia Bulldogs | 10/23/10 | loss 31 - 44 | coverage | |
| @ Mississippi St. Bulldogs | 10/30/10 | loss 17 - 24 | coverage | |
| Charleston Southern Buccaneers | 11/6/10 | win 49 - 21 | coverage | |
| Vanderbilt Commodores | 11/13/10 | win 38 - 20 | coverage | |
Let's see here. Tennessee and Kentucky both lost to the Gators and the Bulldogs and both beat Vandy. They lost to an Ole Miss team Tennessee beat, but they beat a South Carolina to which Tennessee lost. And so we go to the drive charts. Here's how Kentucky did against Vanderbilt:
Animated Drive Charts brought to you by Gameday Depot.
And here again is how Tennessee did against the Commodores:
Hmm. Really, those two drive charts look sorta similar. Right up until the point that Kentucky kicked it into gear. The Wildcats finished strong. We . . . did what we do.
National Unit Rankings
| OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Offense | 43 | 167.18 | Georgia Tech | 319.36 | 6 | Auburn | 307.91 |
| Passing Offense | 20 | 274.36 | Hawaii | 391.18 | 2 | Arkansas | 340.09 |
| Total Offense | 22 | 441.55 | Oklahoma St. | 552.00 | 3 | Auburn | 505.18 |
| Scoring Offense | 22 | 34.73 | Oregon | 50.70 | 4 | Auburn | 42.82 |
| Passing Efficiency | 22 | 150.51 | Boise St. | 185.81 | 6 | Auburn | 182.07 |
| Sacks Allowed | 24 | 1.18 | Army | .36 | 2 | Mississippi | 1.00 |
Offensive observations. I had no idea that Kentucky is a top 25 team in every offensive category but one. They have the best passing offense Tennessee has seen all year. Only Oregon's better in total offense, and only Oregon and Alabama are better in scoring offense. And will Tennessee be able to get any sacks? Justin Wilcox is going to have his hands full Saturday.
| DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Defense | 88 | 178.64 | Boise St. | 72.30 | 11 | South Carolina | 96.09 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 51 | 123.25 | Nebraska | 93.77 | 6 | Alabama | 96.02 |
| Total Defense | 42 | 347.00 | TCU | 223.18 | 7 | LSU | 286.91 |
| Scoring Defense | 81 | 28.91 | TCU | 10.91 | 10 | Alabama | 12.82 |
| Pass Defense | 12 | 168.36 | TCU | 134.64 | 2 | LSU | 151.82 |
| Sacks | T-77 | 1.73 | Boise St. | 3.90 | 10 | South Carolina | 3.27 |
| Tackles For Loss | T-49 | 6.09 | Boise St. | 8.80 | 10 | Vanderbilt | 7.55 |
Defensive observations. This is a little bit better, except that they appear to be built to stop the thing Tennessee does best. They're not particularly awesome at anything, and they're particularly bad at stopping the run, but they'll be the second-best pass defense the Vols have faced this season.
| SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Net Punting | 52 | 36.90 | Florida | 42.24 | 8 | Florida | 42.24 |
| Punt Returns | 78 | 7.04 | Oregon | 20.73 | 9 | Arkansas | 18.31 |
| Kickoff Returns | 46 | 22.67 | UCF | 28.82 | 5 | Florida | 26.41 |
| Turnover Margin | 75 | -.27 | Virginia Tech | 1.36 | 11 | Alabama | 1.09 |
Special teams and turnovers observations. With do-everything Randall Cobb on the team, I expected to see better "offensive" special teams numbers, but they're really just middle of the road on kickoff returns and don't rank well on punt returns. Keep an eye on that turnover margin, too, because if turnovers are more skill than luck (a debateable presumption), then Tennessee (#34 in turnover margin) should have a chance regardless of what the other numbers say.
Stastical Comparison
Here's how the teams looked when the RTT BlogPoll Computery Thing chewed them up and spit them out all wet and sloppy.
| Rank | Team | WL | SOS | PED | RD | 3DO | TD | PEO | OPPG | TO | 3DD |
| 54 | ![]() |
52 | 58 | 51 | 88 | 32 | 42 | 22 | 81 | 22 | 56 |
| 68 | ![]() |
69 | 24 | 31 | 65 | 86 | 71 | 41 | 63 | 76 | 60 |
Well, that's a bit surprising, too, I think. Forget the rank and win/loss, as those can be sort of the results of the other categories. Tennessee ranks better in the three most-heavily weighted categories, and markedly so. Kentucky pretty much takes over from there, though, with the exception of opponent points per game.
Players to watch for
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| OFFENSE | |||
| Rushing | Randall Cobb | 34.18 | |
| Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) | Mike Hartline | 24 | 148.95 |
| Total Offense | Mike Hartline | 29 | 261.82 |
| Receptions Per Game | Randall Cobb | 25 | 6.00 |
| Chris Matthews | T-61 | 4.64 | |
| La'Rod King | 2.91 | ||
| Receiving Yards Per Game | Randall Cobb | T-32 | 76.27 |
| Chris Matthews | 39 | 73.82 | |
| La'Rod King | 38.82 | ||
| Scoring | Randall Cobb | 67 | 7.45 |
| Craig McIntosh | 6.10 | ||
| Chris Matthews | 4.91 | ||
| DEFENSE | |||
| Interceptions | Winston Guy | .18 | |
| Sacks | Danny Trevathan | .27 | |
| Luke McDermott | .27 | ||
| Tackles | Danny Trevathan | T-9 | 10.91 |
| Winston Guy | T-67 | 8.27 | |
| Tackles For Loss | Danny Trevathan | T-21 | 1.36 |
| SPECIAL TEAMS | |||
| Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game) | Ryan Tydlacka | 19 | 44.46 |
| Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Randall Cobb | 43 | 7.88 |
| Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Randall Cobb | 63 | 23.52 |
| Field Goals | Craig McIntosh | T-64 | 1.00 |
| Ryan Tydlacka | .09 | ||
| All-Purpose Runners | Randall Cobb | 2 | 186.09 |
| Chris Matthews | 73.82 | ||
Observations
Offense. Randall Cobb and Mike Hartline make this team go. Cobb ranks well in several categories, but the thing that makes him so special is that he does so many different things for the 'Cats. He's listed as a wide receiver, and at that position, he ranks 25th and 32nd in receptions and receiving yards per game. Credit Hartline with some of that, as Hartline is also hitting WR Chris Matthews enough to make him 61st and 39th in the same categories. But Cobb doesn't stop there. He's also the team's leading rusher. And the punt returner, where he ranks 43rd. And the kickoff returner, where he ranks 63rd. All of that contributes to Cobb's #67 ranking in the scoring stat and to the most impressive stat of all: #2 in the nation in all-purpose rushing. For a receiver. Cobb is one of those guys you never really stop, but those kinds of guys are vulnerable to frustration if you can limit them enough. (Hi, Peter Warrick!) If.
Defense. On defense, the main guy to watch out for is junior linebacker Danny Trevathan, who I'm certain at some point has been called Danny Leviathan. He is tied for 9th nationally in tackles and tied for 21st in tackles for loss. Junior defensive back Winston Guy -- who must be like a B-list Marlboro Man -- also ranks nationally in tackles and is the team's leader in interceptions.
Special teams. Whole lotta Cobb here. Kentucky also has a good punter in Ryan Tydlacka. They're middle-of-the-pack in field goals, a fact that you should file away for the end of the game.
Head to Head Comparisons
How'd we do with the head-to-head comparisons duringVandy week? Remember last week when I said I was going to correct for two straight weeks of over-pessimism regarding the offense? Mistake.
| Prediction | Result | |
| UT rush | 200 | 128 |
| UT pass | 300 | 232 |
| Vandy rush | 140 | 111 |
| Vandy pass | 180 | 222 |
| UT score | 38 | 24 |
| Vandy score | 17 | 10 |
So let's see how we can do this week:
![]() |
![]() |
Best Comparable(s)
|
Result Against Best Comp
|
Prediction
|
|
| UT rush v. Kentucky rush defense | 119.73 (#95) |
178.64 (#88) |
Memphis (178.09) (#86) |
130 | 140 |
| UT pass v. Kentucky pass defense | 240.27 (#44) |
168.36 (#12) |
UF/AL/LSU (168.64/168.73/151.82) (#13/#14/#4) |
259/156/121 | 180 |
| Kentucky rush v. UT rush defense | 155.82 (#65) |
167.18 (#43) |
Florida (161.36) (#48) |
150 | 150 |
| Kentucky pass v. UT pass defense | 225.36 (#76) |
274.36 (#20) |
UAB/Oregon (268.73/251.10) (#26/#35) |
429/202 | 300 |
| UT scoring offense v. Kentucky scoring defense | 27.27 (#59) |
28.91 (#81) |
Vanderbilt (30.91) (#91) |
24 | 28 |
| Kentucky scoring offense v. UT scoring defense | 25.64 (#63) |
34.73 (#22) |
Alabama/South Carolina (35.27/33.64) (#20/#25) |
41/38 | 35 |
As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations. The general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.
This week's example: We're holding opponents to an average of 225 yards passing. Kentucky is getting an average of 274, which is most closely comparable to, of all teams, UAB, which is averaging about 269. But the Blazers torched the Vols for 429 (!) yards. Outlier, that, so looking at the next best comp, we see that Oregon is averaging about 251, and Tennessee held them to 2020. Split the difference, and we get 300 passing yards for Kentucky. Bums.
Yeah, I have Kentucky with an advantage of 450 yards to Tennessee's 320. I nudged UT's score up a bit in light of the Tyler Bray trend, and I was tempted to predict 31 points, but Memphis was Memphis, Ole Miss was aided by two defensive scores, and against Vandy we got only 24. I do think our defense is (hopefully) better than it was against Alabama and South Carolina, so we should be able to hold UK to its scoring average, but it's still high.
Here's the thing, though. Tennessee's played a top 25 schedule, and Kentucky's played just an okay one, so perhaps that shifts the numbers closer to each other. Also, turnovers, again if they're more skill than luck, favor the Vols. And there's the home field advantage on senior day. And the uh-oh factor for Kentucky that I'd imagine isn't easy to shake off once its rooted onto your skin for a quarter of a century. So this could be a toss-up game like Vegas says. Who knows?
Sketchy Conclusions
- Tennessee and Kentucky are fairly even on resume. Both have beaten Vandy, the difference in the game, as shown by the drive charts anyway, being that Kentucky finished strong and Tennessee didn't. Both teams also lost to Florida and Georgia. Kentucky beat South Carolina, who beat Tennessee, but Tennessee beat Ole Miss, who beat Kentucky. Got all that? Overall, Tennessee's played a fairly stronger schedule, so the stats should be viewed accordingly.
- Kentucky is mostly a top 25 team on offense. They feature the best passing offense Tennessee will have seen all season, and they rank right up there with Oregon and Alabama in several other offensive stats.
- On defense, the Wildcats are best at pass defense (12th in the nation), but they're vulnerable against the run (88th in the nation).
- Randall Cobb is a one man wrecking machine, but QB Mike Hartline is also very good. Cobb is a receiver who ranks second in the nation in all-purpose running. He leads the team and is ranked nationally in both receiving categories, leads the team and is ranked nationally in both kickoff and punt returns, and leads the team in rushing yards. He may be the guy who retrieves the tee on kickoffs, too, I don't know.
- The numbers favor Kentucky, but several things may work to Tennessee's advantage to deny the numbers their day. The Vols have played a better schedule, they have home field advantage on Senior Day, and they've been better able to win the turnover battle. And curses and streaks have ways of self-perpetuating. But they also have this nasty knack of coming to an end.
Predictions
- Kentucky 35, Tennessee 28. Apologies.




There are 37 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.