Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

They're Not Even Good Khakis

Getting pants isn't all bad, especially when you're a little bit accustomed to it.  But it can be a bit of a letdown.

It seems we go through this every year, doesn't it?  We have some massive change and get a shiny new present to open in the fall.  Despite knowing that the gift-giving market isn't exactly ideal, we still talk ourselves into hopefulness and anticipation.  But then we get pants.

Khakis.

Not that I mind khakis, really.  If you know me, you know that I wear them almost exclusively.  They're comfy.  They look good in both casual and relaxed business environments.  And if you bother to buy quality khakis, they can last for years and years.  I'm partial to Izod; they wear very nicely, they're built with quality in mind, and they don't fray at the hem.  (I can't find them anymore, though; if you know where to get them, please leave a comment in the thread.  Thanks.)  Given a choice of Izod and a cheaper brand, I'll take the Izod.  One Izod is worth 2 or 3 of most other brands because they last so long.  But even if I can't find Izod and I have to settle for a cheaper brand, you better not expect me to pay Izod prices for them.

I'm the same way with restaurants.  I'm very faithful to the ones I like, but if I notice that the food quality is diminishing and the prices are increasing, I won't go back.  I don't have the history with McAlister's / Sam and Andy's that some people do.  I liked them when I first tried them, but the quality is gone and the prices are far too high.  I haven't been in a McAlister's in months.  Perhaps only once or twice in the last year or so, to be honest.

Which brings me to Tennessee football and schedule changes.

Star-divide

I won't even try to be tactful; UT is trying to sell us an inferior product at a superior price.  I haven't heard an actual figure on the buyout of the North Carolina Tar Heels game yet, but I'm guessing it's around a million dollars or so.  The fans will pay that.  Then they'll pay the price to bring the Buffalo Bulls in.  Then they'll pay for the seats, the parking fees, and the lousy concessions to watch a game that we just won't be excited about.  It's no disrespect to Buffalo, but when you have a chance to play an adjacent-state recruiting rival with a decent program and a coach we once thought about, it's a bit of a letdown to get a team with whom you have no history or emotional connection whatsoever.

On top of that, Tennessee is now the clear P.R. loser in the UT/USC game storyline.  Yes, the Trojans offered us a game.  Yes, we declined.  Yes, we said that it was too late to switch our schedule.  Yes, we then swapped North Texas for Montana and UNC for Buffalo.  Let's be honest: we may not have 'ducked' USC, but we certainly didn't want anything to do with them.  Now, instead of the Trojans and the Tarheels, we get the Grizzlies and the Bulls.  Well, at least the only adjective to describe that is a decent pun:  un-bear-a-bull.

Remember when Tennessee was the "play anyone, anywhere" team of the SEC?  Not anymore.  Eight home games.  The second FCS team ever (and the second in as many years).  Eleventh-hour cancellations of respectable games.  Softening the schedule.  Tennessee used to play the closest thing to an NFL-type schedule, where nearly every game required the team's best.  Now Tennessee plays the very kind of schedule we used to make fun of Georgia for playing (under then-AD Vince Dooley in particular).  By the way, we can no longer tease Florida about teams like Charleston Southern.  It's a pot-kettle thing.

Look, I understand the 'gauntlet' argument.  It's a tough stretch and Tennessee is not as deep as it once was.  That doesn't matter.  We agreed to the games.  We made the schedule and the right thing to do is live up to it.  (The North Texas game was excusable; UNT is opening a new stadium in 2011 and wants the first game at home.  That's the kind of thing you cancel games for.  Tennessee dropped North Carolina out of fear.)

Inferior product at a marked-up price.  The cover charge for these switches will guarantee that we're paying Izod level for something nameless out of the bargain bin.  And we'll be expected to pay it because passing up on this 'deal' will 'only hurt the players'.

Some will blame Mike Hamilton.  Others will blame Derek Dooley.  They're both right; these things aren't decided solely by the AD or the head coach.  If I had to guess, I'd say that Dooley approached Hamilton about the change, but that's speculation.  Besides, no matter who approached whom, both signed off on it.

The only possible benefit to dropping UNC is a better shot at a bowl game.  Granted, the conference schedule that year is brutal for UT; adding Cincy and UNC on top of that (especially assuming that Cincy doesn't collapse without Kelly) makes for 10 games where UT could very well win only 3.  Buffalo does give a better chance at winning than North Carolina, but if we're really going to add a no-interest game to the schedule for a better postseason consideration, we ought not to be doing it for a chance to play in Shreveport.

A game against UNC would have been televised nationally.  A game against Buffalo will end up at the last thing ESPN wants to pick up on the SEC weekend, and I can't blame them.  We're losing great exposure, a very interesting game on many levels, our reputation for good scheduling - all for a shot at a break-even bowl game that nobody wants to travel to.

Sometimes, I'm glad I'm a Wyoming alum.  At least the price is honest.

Comment 92 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great take on it, Hooper

I agree completely (see my comment from this morning.)

If there is a good reason for this, I haven’t heard it yet. Considering a stretch with our usual SEC foes, an above-average (but by no means elite) UNC team, and a crappy Brian Kelly-less Cinci team a “gauntlet” to be scared of is WAC thinking. Coach Dooley better learn how to think like an SEC coach.

And if this was Hamilton’s doing, his seat is getting warmer all the time.

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd prefer not to invoke the wrath of the Fulmerizer

so I’ll just stay mum on the topic for now.

Simulated Gameday Experience - just like the real thing, only we have smoke machines.

by Chris Pendley on Aug 17, 2010 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly

Extremely disappointing. Good take. I’d just like to add two things:

1. We already had a bye week after the UNC game. So the gauntlet argument is crap, imo. Who changes their opponent before the bye week to be more rested after the bye week? Really?

2. If this is the difference between Shreveport and staying home for the winter, it’s a good call. We need the extra bowl practice. But I’m more hopeful about next year. This year’s biggest problems project to be depth and experience. Next year, we’ll have a recruiting class to fill out numbers, and we’ll have returning starters at QB, RB, 4 of 5 O-line spots, 3 of 4 D-line spots, and 3 of 4 secondary spots, to go with our already quality depth at WR and LB. Honestly, I see next year’s team positioned better than UNC, Cincy, Montana, MTSU, UK, Vandy, Georgia, and South Carolina, putting us at an 8 win expectation and a realistic shot to hit 10 (LSU at home, Arkansas likely minus Mallet). That’s not the team that needs an extra patsy to make a bowl.

by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 17, 2010 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

100% Agree

This is stupid.

Bring it across, shape it down

by Getoffmyvols on Aug 17, 2010 2:33 PM EDT reply actions  

I have gone from Sadness

To anger. I realize there’s probably not that many North Carolina Vols who really can’t travel 6+ hours for a UT game and pay for hotels, parking, tickets, food, etc … but there is at least one. I was already making plans with some friends from UNC to spend a weekend with them, hang out for the first time in a few years, head to the game together — they were going to get me in with a Student-Guest ticket … but nah. Nah. Instead I’ll probably have to gamecast the Buffalo game since lord knows that game isn’t going to be televised over here .. and I can watch the bowl game we might make because of this. Pah. Pathetic. If we’re having another 5-6 season history shows we’ll choke against the cupcake WYOMING VANDERBILT team we got anyways.

Eric Berry Eats Landsharks For Breakfast.

by bobothevol on Aug 17, 2010 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Ok, so I fixed my html tag issue.

I get so used to typing the tags in comments that I forget that they don’t work in the story editor.

[end tangent]

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Jeff Jacoby defended it this morning saying most teams don't play two "big-name" OOC teams in the same year

… which is patently ridiculous for a couple of reasons. First, most people don’t consider UNC and Cincinnati “big-name” teams, particularly with Brian Kelly gone. Vol fans in the 1990s would have laughed at the idea of running from either one of these teams.

Second:
FSU plays at Oklahoma and vs. BYU in back-to-back weeks this year, and closes their season with Florida.
Georgia’s playing at Colorado (not a “big name” in my mind, but they are if you consider the likes of UNC and Cinci “big names,”) and Georgia Tech this year.
Iowa State is playing at Iowa and vs. Utah this year.
LSU is playing UNC and West Virginia this year.
Miami is playing at Ohio State, vs. Pitt, and vs. USF this year. (Again, USF isn’t much, but I consider them at least as big a name as Cinci.)
Oklahoma plays FSU and at Cinci this year.
Oregon St. plays at TCU and at Boise St. in the first four weeks this year.
Pitt plays at Utah and vs. Miami in the first four weeks and also plays at Notre Dame this year.
USF plays at Florida and at Miami this year.
Utah plays Pitt and at Notre Dame this year.
Washington plays at BYU and vs. Nebraska this year.

Try again, Jacoby.

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 3:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm embarrassed.

...just apologize for not thanking me.

by kidbourbon on Aug 17, 2010 3:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Devil's advocate here.

Dropping this game means that we, as fans, will get an inferior game. It may also be the difference between CDD keeping and losing a job. I can’t fault the guy for that. And we were the play anyone-anywhere team, back when we were good. We ain’t good anymore. If CDD wants to be here in three years to savor the fruit of the rebuilding tree he’s planting, he has to survive. At the end of each year, the key metric he’s going to be graded on is win-loss; this is especially true next year, since I think he gets a well-deserved pass on that this year. “Playing tough” and “being in the games” are going to matter exactly doodly squat if we go 5-7 next year and miss a bowl.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

This

"I condone fun things" ~~ Cortland Finnegan

Hello ladies. Look at your man, now back to me, now back at your man, now back to me. Sadly, he isn't me.

by VolBrian on Aug 17, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can't fault him for it?

We can’t fault him for embarrassing our program in a shameless attempt to keep his job before he’s even coached his first game? I think we actually can fault him for that.

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well said

I realize some, or even a lot, are gonna be upset about this, but I could care less tbh. Assuring ourselves of having those extra bowl practices and extra exposure later in the season is worth it imo.

"I condone fun things" ~~ Cortland Finnegan

Hello ladies. Look at your man, now back to me, now back at your man, now back to me. Sadly, he isn't me.

by VolBrian on Aug 17, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can see both sides as well

It’s pretty embarrassing right now, but I also know that I may very well look at it differently if we’re 3-9 at the end of the season.

I love Hooper’s line, though:

Buffalo does give a better chance at winning than North Carolina, but if we’re really going to add a no-interest game to the schedule for a better postseason consideration, we ought not to be doing it for a chance to play in Shreveport.

That statement’s built on an assumption or two, but they’re pretty solid assumptions, and the conclusion is spot on, so when you look at it like that — giving up an interesting game that could result in either an L or a W for an uninteresting W and a bowl game in Shreveport — well, that’s a pretty persuasive argument.

But on the other hand, perspective has a way of shifting when testosterone coursing through your veins gives way to blood running out of them.

by Joel Hollingsworth on Aug 17, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the extra practices are key

especially with as young as this team is/ is likely to be. The bottom line for me is, yes, this would have boiled my blood in 2000. Ten years on, however, and we aren’t who we were then. It’s pretty fashionable (especially if you cruise the GVX forums) to hate everything Hamilton does, but every decision he’s made has arguably been the right one at the time (hindsight is 20/20, and I was as vocal a supporter of the Chimera as anyone else while they were here). If Hamilton and Dooley think that is a move that improves our team in the long run versus a short term watering-down of the schedule, so be it. Hell, it’s always possible (tho very improbable) that CDD goes 0-24 the next two seasons and we’re back to courting Butch Davis or whoever again anyways.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The extra practices are a good argument.

That needs to be put out at the forefront. But even then, you’re admitting that you don’t think you can get there through UNC. That’s still submission to another dog we’ve never seen as an alpha before.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

If college football were anything other than a whorish money-grab...

… then a bowl game considering us next year would remember us weaseling out of the UNC game and go after somebody else.

Luckily for us, a whorish money-grab is exactly what it is.

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure you can even say that.

I think there’s an argument to made that sure, we could beat UNC, but at what cost? Is our depth at the point next year that we can expect to run that gauntlet of a schedule and not be in worse shape for the stretch run?

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not convinced that Buffalo will be much easier on UT.

The risk of injuries, wear-down, etc. is not much lower. But the loss of respectability in the schedule is big.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Request for clarification

If I;m remembering right, is this trading an away UNC for a home Buffalo game? Thats also a big consideration.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's true.

I see that UNC is not that far away, and I also wonder how interested people will be to go to a home game they view as a dud.

Fortunately, a year is a long, long ways away in football fandom terms.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also (I promise I'll stop soon)

these schedules are penciled in years in advance. I’d be a lot more apt to tell the coach and AD to cowboy up if both of them were here when these agreements were made. Again, devil’s advocate, there is apart of me that says, hey, you wanna represent UT, you stand there and bust the big boys in the chops, and take whatever comes whistlin back at ya.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That's the thing though, UNC was Hamilton's baby

he’s from Carolina, and he says in the interview linked below that he picked up the phone and made the initial call.

by Will Shelton on Aug 17, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

Times are tough, hard to face reality, but we need a bowl game in the worst way. We also need a game that can provide back-ups some reps and rest for the starters and minimize chances of injury. Also need a confidence booster game versus another grind on a brutal schedule.

Give our situation, it’s the correct decision that leaves a bit of bad taste.

by phil g on Aug 17, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right, I understand the reasoning

I just don’t like it.

Season ticket sales seem to be a growing issue, and I think stunts like this are just gasoline on the fire.

Bring it across, shape it down

by Getoffmyvols on Aug 17, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear the counterarguments for sure.

It’s not like this was a COMPLETELY bogus decision. And normally I don’t criticize decisions when it’s not a black-and-white issue. But I just think we sold too much in the process on this one.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Devil's advocate here.

Dropping this game means that we, as fans, will get an inferior game. It may also be the difference between CDD keeping and losing a job. I can’t fault the guy for that. And we were the play anyone-anywhere team, back when we were good. We ain’t good anymore. If CDD wants to be here in three years to savor the fruit of the rebuilding tree he’s planting, he has to survive. At the end of each year, the key metric he’s going to be graded on is win-loss; this is especially true next year, since I think he gets a well-deserved pass on that this year. “Playing tough” and “being in the games” are going to matter exactly doodly squat if we go 5-7 next year and miss a bowl.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

This too

"I condone fun things" ~~ Cortland Finnegan

Hello ladies. Look at your man, now back to me, now back at your man, now back to me. Sadly, he isn't me.

by VolBrian on Aug 17, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha.

The first time I tried, I got the “This post cannot be submitted error Try again later”. So I tried again. It lied, I say, lied! Feel free to take out of my posts (and schedule an easier post in its absence).

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Probably a good plan.

Its important to break up the gauntlet of challenging posts.

Bring it across, shape it down

by Getoffmyvols on Aug 17, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

LOL

rec’d

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

This saddens me.

Never would I have thought we would back down from anyone. UNC isn’t that huge of a Juggernaut. It now looks as though we will duck opponents when it suits our interests. Certainly, this is not the Tennessee way I remember. Buying this game out would have been acceptable if we were doing it to play USC — not a cupcake. Ugh.

To Strive, To Seek, To Find, and Not to Yield.

by mike2ray on Aug 17, 2010 4:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Can't we go back to the typo thing and hype the heck out of playing the Buffalo BILLS?

Who else plays the pros?

The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

by memphispete on Aug 17, 2010 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Can I at least get an "AMEN" from Hooper?

The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

by memphispete on Aug 17, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Preacher's favorite words: "In conclusion" and "Let us receive the benediction"....

The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

by memphispete on Aug 18, 2010 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's my thing:

Hamilton sounds worried about finding six wins not just this year, but next year. And that’s fine – we’ll see how often he keeps signing his letters with “Expect to win” at the bottom.

But instead of being worried about finding just enough, we didn’t want to look at this game as an opportunity? Let’s just use a somewhat reasonable scenario and say we go 7-5 this year, and then we win our bowl game to get to 8-5. I still don’t think UT people are going to then suddenly expect us to be in Atlanta in 2011. If we did that and then lost at Chapel Hill (which would probably come on the heels of losing at Gainesville), I don’t think anyone would start screaming that the sky was falling.

No one is going to remember what happens against Buffalo unless we lose. So you’ve cashed in an opportunity for this program to take a step forward. Fans don’t care about numbers are much as we care about moments – for instance, we went 8-5 in 2002 and 7-6 last year, but last year was a thousand times more enjoyable; even with one fewer total win, the games we won (and the way we played) in ‘09 were much more memorable than ’02 (where I remember 6 OTs against Arkansas, and that’s it). If we lose to North Carolina, okay, we’re still rebuilding. But this takes away an opportunity for a win that would help us move forward, a step in the process, now replaced with a meaningless game. The only reason you do this is if you believe Buffalo for North Carolina is the difference between 6-6 and 5-7…and if that’s the case next year, then we’ve got much bigger problems and so does Mike Hamilton.

And here’s a natural question out of all of this. I know not all UT fans agree, but I think Mike Hamilton has done a good job as AD. He hit the jackpot on Bruce Pearl. The improvements at Thompson-Boling are incredible. Neyland Stadium has gotten a facelift. The non-revenue sports are winning the way they always have (other than baseball, where I guess the jury’s still out on Raleigh). The Fulmer situation was a nightmare that he didn’t ask for, but looking back I think he made the only move he could (not in hiring Kiffin, but in letting Phillip go when he did).

But now with Kiffin and the NCAA and the bleak outlook in football, Hamilton has to know that most, if not all of his fate is tied directly to Dooley. So is there a part of him that knows he has to try and make life as easy as possible on Dooley, so he can make life as easy as possible on himself? That’s a natural inclination that I think all of us would have and many of us would act on – you see GMs in professional sports (especially the NBA) do this all the time, where they make just enough moves to be just good enough to stay employed.

Either way, we’ve sold out an opportunity to move forward, and a piece of our reputation along with it.

by Will Shelton on Aug 17, 2010 5:04 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Great comments

Except in your last line, we didn’t “sell out” anything. To the contrary, we paid a million bucks for this hit to our reputation.

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The spin will say

+ $2-3 mil for another home game in the exchange. But whether buying out up front or selling out long term, it’s bad either way.

by Will Shelton on Aug 17, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

“And here’s a natural question out of all of this. I know not all UT fans agree, but I think Mike Hamilton has done a good job as AD.”

That is actually something I was considering writing on. Hamilton is a good AD. His fate will certainly be tied to Dooley, and Hamilton knew that when he hired the guy.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 6:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

However...

There’s still no reason to take any nonsense from any other SEC teams about non-conference scheduling. We still have a stronger past and future than any other team in this league.

by Will Shelton on Aug 17, 2010 5:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, let's live off our past OOC scheduling...

Might as well, we’re living off our past everything else.

(Good point about the future though, as long as we don’t start buying out of those games.)

Lou Brock loves Lamp.

by birdjam on Aug 17, 2010 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

[FULMERIZED]

[FULMERIZED] [FULMERIZED] [FULMERIZED]ing [FULMERIZED] in the [FULMERIZED] [FULMERIZED] [FULMERIZED] ear.

.

________________________________
I will give my shirt for Tennessee today.

by Holly Anderson on Aug 17, 2010 5:32 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

You have to admit, though,

hitting ‘control-v’ (or whatever the Mac equivalent is) had to feel pretty good there.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

command-V

Or squiggle-V, as I tell my mom, who just bought her first Mac.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lettin this one slide.

I think the UNC vs Buffalo argument is plenty contentious enough without getting into a Mac Vs PC debate on top of it. :)

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

My better half has a Mac

and I have no problem with them, fwiw.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dedicated Mac user for 23 years now.

And I’d gladly mix it up over this issue as well, but in addition to the main discussion, I’m cooking dinner and making sure the daughters clean their rooms, so my resources are taxed as is. :)

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I typed them all out. Really.

Just to hit something with lethal force (TAKE THAT F KEY).

________________________________
I will give my shirt for Tennessee today.

by Holly Anderson on Aug 17, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Summation

As my original post(s) stated, I’m playing Devil’s Advocate; I am in no way stating that my position is the be all-end all position. Not that I’m implying that any of you are accusing me of that; I just wanted to make it clear. That being said, I’m not even 100% on my own side of the issue. I think it sucks that the state of our program even makes this a move that had to be considered, let alone made, and even with where the Vols are I still say, bring ‘em all on. The same part of me that said bring U$C on, even tho the rational part of me said that the upside for a losing wounded U$C team in terms of publicity and exposure were much more than a hypothetical win for us. If I’ve ruffled feathers, I apologize – I’ll blame it on the low-iodine diet. No dairy and no bacon make Dan something something. :)

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 6:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Hey, I'm happy you're playing devil's advocate.

I think everybody took your posts exactly as you meant. They gave us a chance to sound off and put our thoughts into a discussion, which is always helpful. I like playing devil’s advocate, but I was kinda disqualified this time, so I appreciate you doing it.

And I’d be more than happy to have my feelings changed. I hope this turns out to be some freakishly brilliant move in retrospect.

No ruffled feathers from you, I assure you.

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Go crazy?

Neyland Stadium-It goes to eleven.

by jimvols on Aug 18, 2010 1:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t mind if I do!

by danmarcel on Aug 18, 2010 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dude, yes!

Simpsons ftw!

Urge to kill, rising…

Neyland Stadium-It goes to eleven.

by jimvols on Aug 18, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

So you’re just wasting 60% of your brain? Tragic.

by Joel Hollingsworth on Aug 18, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty much.

Since I have two daughters (8 and 5) the other 60% is occupied by a rotation of Hannah Montana, iCarly, and Wizards of Waverly Place.

by danmarcel on Aug 18, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Woo for daughters

8 and 14 here. So far, though, our household obsessions are cello, horses, Nancy Drew computer games, and Switchfoot, so I’ve got it good. Except for the horses. Suckers are expensive.

;-)

by Joel Hollingsworth on Aug 18, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another thought:

We are approaching this as the possible difference between 5-7 and 6-6. What about 6-6 and 7-5? Would we rather risk UNC and 6-6 or take Buffalo and 7-5?

by David Hooper on Aug 17, 2010 6:59 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Bad teams don't deserve to play in bowls.

I’ve thought this for years, and if we’re dependent on beating friggin’ Buffalo to get into a bowl game, we’re not even close to coming back and we don’t deserve the dignity of spending a vaguely gray December 29th in Nashville against the 9th-best team the ACC has to offer. If you’re going to go down in flames, go down in flames with your head held high (and in some cases, middle fingers in all directions if that suits you). It’s even more inexcusable when it’s the difference between 6-6 and 7-5. You keep North Carolina on the schedule, because blasting through a difficult schedule is so much more rewarding than beating up on patsies – and even if it comes down to poll rankings, are we really going to be excited about being ranked 22nd in the nation because of a 45-13 win over a MAC team that was regularly among the worst in the nation for the better part of the last decade?

So yes, this reeks of cheap play and a cheap ploy that by all rights, we should be better than and we should be over. Will nailed it – this comes off as a save-your-job move for Dooley’s sake (who’s going to have pitchforks after him by some of the UT faithful if he stumbles with a thin roster and a hellacious schedule) on the part of Hamilton, who may need to hide more pictures of him doing the things Holly thinks he does if he wants to stay. It’s a short-sighted move designed to save the skin of those involved at the expense of those yet to come (which – hey, we’ve seen with NBA franchises too, to continue Will’s idea there too).

The part that grates me is UT’s going to come out on top financially in this, even with the payout. It’s a great move financially, but good luck getting anything out of North Carolina for the next four years. Hope that was worth it.

Simulated Gameday Experience - just like the real thing, only we have smoke machines.

by Chris Pendley on Aug 17, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Decisions to jettison existing games shouldn't be made on the basis of extra practices.

That goes double for extra practices that may be 16 months from now. With two full seasons to get used to Dooley’s scheme, what are we going to get from an additional 5-6 half-speed walkthroughs where everyone is healing up from getting the crap knocked out of them over the prior three months?

Simulated Gameday Experience - just like the real thing, only we have smoke machines.

by Chris Pendley on Aug 17, 2010 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's my thought

I don’t know why we’re expecting 5-6 wins next year. We’ll return friggin’ 7 starters on offense and 6-7 on defense. We’re graduating people at positions with lots of depth (WR, DE, LB). Doesn’t a talented but inexperienced team that stays together for two years usually get pretty good the second year. Why don’t we think of this as 8-4/9-3 (50/50) or 9-3 (almost 100%)?

At any rate, at 6-6 vs. 7-5, you play UNC, get the experience with the tougher game. The bowl game will be a tossup.

by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 17, 2010 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

even a truly crummy UT team

should never run from a middling ACC team. shame, shame, shame.

the UNC football team hasn’t been better than 4-4 playing in a basketball conference since 2004 (pre-season ncaa polls be fulmerized!). leave them on the schedule and beat them. end of story.

The Dual Threat, Official Enforcer/Stat Geek of MCM.

by hal41605 on Aug 17, 2010 7:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't buy the khakis
Inferior product at a marked-up price. The cover charge for these switches will guarantee that we’re paying Izod level for something nameless out of the bargain bin. And we’ll be expected to pay it because passing up on this ‘deal’ will ‘only hurt the players’.

A few years ago I had a conversation with Joel in the week leading up to a game where Tennessee was playing somebody weak (maybe Marshall?). Anyway, I couldn’t go to the game—it was shortly after the birth of my twins—and Joel said he probably wouldn’t go either out of lack of interest.

I told him that was a mistake: that gameday at Neyland is a special event that only happens 6 or 7 times a year and that if you have the chance to go, you gotta go. That said, I think we fans should boycott the Buffalo game next year.

I’m not mad at the idea of us looking “cowardly” for “ducking” UNC. I’m mad at the idea of UTAD charging, what, like forty bucks for what in the best-case scenario will a a terribly dull and forgettable game?

You weren’t going to Neyland that day anyway. You were either going on a pretty terrific road trip or sitting at home to watch what would have been an intriguing game (to say the least). So still don’t go to Neyland. Or, if you feel the need to support the boys, go to the stadium, go en masse to the Vol walk, find a tailgate with a satellite and be entertained. But don’t give those [FULMERIZED]s a penny that they don’t deserve.

Don’t let them sell you crap. Don’t but the khakis.

by CornFromAJar on Aug 17, 2010 7:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Heh

If that was Marshall, I did end up going.

And it turned out to be a torrential downpour with ankle-deep water on the concourse and, if I remember right (questionable), a several hour storm delay. Was that the first day in forever they didn’t have the Vol Walker? And the team didn’t run through the T? My memory’s foggy. Again, I blame old age and trans fats.

But you know what? I still have that memory, and, despite all of that, it’s a good one. Gameday at Neyland is special and scarce. You were right.

On the other hand, there are still season tickets available for this season, and at, last I checked, only a $100 donation. Single game tickets for Florida were still available last time I checked. The economy’s killing everybody, and although my family and I have nothing to complain about, we’re still pinching pennies, and I don’t know whether I’m buying tickets to any game this year. I feel unpatriotic, but it’s tight out there. And the point about diminishing the quality of the product in such a climate is a very good one.

by Joel Hollingsworth on Aug 17, 2010 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

No Vol Walk, game start was delayed by about an hour from what I recall.

I was working in the museum that day (or just hanging out there with someone else who was working, I forget), but met up with a friend for the game. First time sitting on the opposite side from the students for me, which was weird.

Simulated Gameday Experience - just like the real thing, only we have smoke machines.

by Chris Pendley on Aug 17, 2010 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately

(or fortunately I guess, depending on your POV) it was a lack of butts in seats that ultimately eroded the last of CPF’s support and got him fired. Everyone is free to vote with their wallets, but it’s often not as tightly targeted a weapon as you might hope.

by danmarcel on Aug 17, 2010 7:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Just this one game

I’m not saying there should be a series of boycotts. There should be 100K in Neyland every week. But “they” need to hear that this is not OK.

If you went to a steakhouse, ordered a steak, and they brought you a bologna sandwich and still charged you for the steak, would you be happy? If the restaurant announced ahead of time that they were having pay for steak, receive bologna night, would you still go? Because UT-Buffalo is bologna at steak prices.

(And if I’m coming of as a little testy about this it because it’s a pet peeve of mine. When the NCAA added the 12th game, it was a chance for schools to play more interesting games. Instead, we got more pointless games, and ticket prices went up.)

by CornFromAJar on Aug 17, 2010 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

No matter which way you look at this, UT just looks bad

OK..so what’s the WORST case scenario if we had played UNC next fall? We go to Chapel Hill, get blown out and have a nice revenge game set up for them to come here in 2012. What’s the worst case scenario now?? We lose to a much more inferior opponent AT HOME. I would gladly take option #1. We should never, never run from an opponent. How does this look to the nation? How does this look to recruits? We especially don’t cower from an ACC Team! They have about 2 or 3 football schools in a basketball power conference.

I’ve given Mike Hamilton a ton of slack, but I think he is ultimately to blame for this fiasco..not a good way to hype up your new season and new coach by already running away from a game that is over a year away.

by Solid Orange on Aug 17, 2010 9:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Not exactly the best way to instill confidence in a fanbase already hesitant to purchase tickets for this upcoming season.

I think I’ll be scalping my way into a few games this year…

Neyland Stadium-It goes to eleven.

by jimvols on Aug 18, 2010 1:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Holly's Signature

And my own still seething anger every time I see this caused me to make a new signature. We need content during the football season? Can I have a “I’m from North Carolina AND I HATE YOUR GUTS RIGHT NOW MIKE HAMILTON!!!!!!!!!!!” column? The content will be something like this:

______________________________________________
I will give my North Carolina for Tennessee Today. Apparently.

by bobothevol on Aug 18, 2010 7:10 AM EDT reply actions  

A chicken crap move.....

A chicken crap move by Mike and Derek. I do not care how tough the schedule is next year. Man up and go to Chapel Hill and play’em. UNC is a middle of the pack team in the ACC and we can not play err, beat them in their barn. Even attempt to beat them in their barn. This is a step back for the program. Let’s hope next year Buffalo does not have an experience team that comes in fired up to play in front of 100,000 plus and steals a win on the hill. If that happens it might not have been so bad to go to UNC after all.

by jmkiii58 on Aug 18, 2010 8:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Isn't every ACC team?
UNC is a middle of the pack team in the ACC

______________________________________________
I will give my North Carolina for Tennessee Today. Apparently.

by bobothevol on Aug 18, 2010 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

No I believe......

No I believe there is a clearly 2 top tier teams. I think Virginia Tech (who gave us a Peachtree street beatdown) and Georgia Tech see themselves as the top tier teams in the conference. The bottom line is Tennessee should not back out of this game. It makes UT look weak. A bad move by Mike and Derek.

by jmkiii58 on Aug 18, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Top tier in the ACC is a relative thing.

It’s like being an Alabama honor student. Or the best tasting dog turd.

by danmarcel on Aug 18, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I concur....

Except one thing in the ACC all the atheletes can spell. At Alabama apparently no one can. There is a story the the Bama atheletic department misspelled Mississippi on the season ticket. YEP that is right. Freakin Unreal. Here is the link. http://friendsoftheprogram.net/2010/08/11/bama-drops-mississippi-state-from-schedule/ Enjoy and GO BIG ORANGE!!!

by jmkiii58 on Aug 19, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Darn you Mike Hamilton

Buffalo is my wife’s alum.

If we lose this game (and gawd help us of we do) I will be forced to move out my of freaking house.

Thanks Mike. Appreciate tat. Better marriages through SEC Football schedules brought to you by Mike Hamilton.

"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." John Heisman

by Joseph Stanley on Aug 18, 2010 8:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Try living

With someone who graduated with Brandon Spikes!! .. At least she’s still 100% Panther and not that nasty, nasty New England-type. Granted, I think all of us UT fans share that horrible kind of pain.

______________________________________________
I will give my North Carolina for Tennessee Today. Apparently.

by bobothevol on Aug 18, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

So what does that do for me?

I’m neither Southern nor New Englander.

…and is it bad that my first thought was to equate “Panther” with “Cougar”?

by David Hooper on Aug 18, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

She totally is! A year older than me .. the scandal!!

And you’re horrible and we all hate you for being from the Mid-West. I thought you’d have picked that up by now. ;-)

______________________________________________
I will give my North Carolina for Tennessee Today. Apparently.

by bobothevol on Aug 18, 2010 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nah

She graduated with Drew Haddad, Ed O’Niel’s son.

She doesn’t like it when we go comparing NFL players but I am dreading this game

"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." John Heisman

by Joseph Stanley on Aug 18, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

My Buffalo Bills Coalition has exactly one member

/slam. Um, make that zero members.

I’m gone!

The COEXIST bumper sticker is ridiculous. How are people supposed to get along when one side is flying planes into tall buildings or wearing sweater vests full of C4 and nails? The faiths are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

by memphispete on Aug 18, 2010 8:47 AM EDT reply actions  

In 1981 UT started the

In 1981, UT started the season on the road at Georgia( defending Nat’l Champs) and S. California. The Big Orange got spanked both weeks by total score of 87-7. Tennesee started the year out 0-2 but bounced back and won 7 out of the next 9 and finished the year at 7-4. Also won the bowl game the defunct Garden State Bowl to finish with 8 wins. Coach Majors did not seek relief for such a tough opening schedule. Instead the team work hard and got better to finish with a good year. 2011 would have been a difficult challenge but it should have been met head on and not looking like a team wimping out to go to Nashville for the Music city bowl. A bad move by both Mike and Derek.

by jmkiii58 on Aug 18, 2010 4:30 PM EDT reply actions  

No Big Deal

Cool down everybody. Yes, I too was looking forward to playing UNC but if for whatever reason, Hamilton or Dooley choose to cancel that series, then so be it. It only effects 2011 schedule truly. In 2012, we open the season playin in ATL against NC State…so do we really need to play both UNC and State in the same yr? And I’m certainly not worried about people thinking we’re scared…really, Ohio St, Oregon, Oklahoma, and Nebraska already scheduled in the coming years!

So for one yr, we have an out-of conference slate that looks like the normal Florida and UGA schedule every year. The sky is not fallin people!!!

by SGL_14 on Aug 18, 2010 6:08 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Tennessee Volunteers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gameday_depot_hat_guy_190x190__no_drop_shadow__small
Dooley 2012 Car Decals Now Available
Ilikevols_small
Very inspirational FanPost from me. You're welcome.
Preds_game_small
Best Plays: Exciting or Depressing
N701379423_720742_7509_small
Malik Jackson to the Broncos!
20050073_detail_small
Welcome to Uncertainty, Arkansas Fans
Preds_game_small
Really?!?!? Really?!?!
A_cullen_the_bug_small
NIT Bracket Challenge - Complete before 7pm
Small
Selection Sunday - Where do the Vols Go?
A_cullen_the_bug_small
REPLAY - Anatomy of the Final 5.10 minutes vs Ol Miss
Small
UPDATED - SEC Coach of Year

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE ROCKY TOP TALK STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel

Animated Drive Charts

RTT Classics

RTT Classics 2008 Animated BlogPoll2007 Animated BlogPollLOL! Your logo is so scary! Welcome to Rocky Top Talk Tradition! Fiddlin' on the Roof2008 Animated BlogPoll The Season of Which We Do Not Speak Pearlfection Case Study: 2QB Systems and the 2005 Tennessee Volunteers The 2007 College Football Blogger Awards The 2006 College Football Blogger Awards The 20 coolest college football logos The 10 worst college football logos The 29 most boring college football logos 2006 Animated BCS Race 2005 Animated Race to the Rose Bowl

YouTube


Editor-in-Chief

Gameday_depot_hat_guy_190x190__no_drop_shadow__small Joel Hollingsworth

Senior Editor

Gromit_small David Hooper

Associated_20press_clayliston_1965_l_small kidbourbon

Tennessee_logo_small Will Shelton

Tumblr_lx1hpdd3yx1r2a42bo1_250_small Chris Pendley

Mutantenemy_small Incipient_Senescence

Ut_small Brad Shepard

Author

Avatar2_small rustytanton

Vols_dooley_hair_small Getoffmyvols

Pygmy_marmoset_small marmotman

Picture_081_small Joseph Stanley

Jackson_the_mule_avatar_small Jackson the Mule

Img_0171_small RockyTopinKY

6156218740_03c5ca84f5_m_small VolnVA

Top_small _trey_

Small Chien Rouge