Daniel Lincoln named starting kicker, Chad Cunningham starting punter
SPECIAL TEAMS MELTDOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Seniority will apparently rule the day for the Vols this fall, as Daniel Lincoln and Chad Cunningham, both the incumbent seniors at kicker and punter, will retain their starting jobs for the Vols this fall. (H/T: Austin Ward). Both men held off freshman Michael Palardy, who arrived on campus with a significant deal of hype as the number one kicker in the Class of 2010. Matt Darr was later signed as a transfer from Fresno State, the number one punter in the 2010 class.
For a program that's seen plenty of special teams mishaps and also seen plenty of transition, I think most of us assumed that things would get better in the third phase under Derek Dooley, and the main reason they got better would be Palardy - when you're the number one kicker in the country, the common belief is that you're good enough to win the job right away. Is there some sort of maturation process that kickers have to go through from high school to college, beyond an extra five yards on kicks?
I both hope and think that Dooley based this decision simply on whoever kicked better in fall camp; he praised Palardy as well today and said he's still in the hunt on kickoffs ($). This feels like a Phillip Fulmer move - reward the seniors, let the young guys have their day later.
Lincoln has been on the wrong end of some of the Vols' most painful moments in the last three years - missing two kicks in the 2007 SEC Championship Game, missing in overtime at UCLA, and his 1-for-4 performance at #1 Alabama last year, including Cody's famous block on the potential game winner. You can blame his quad injury if you like, but Lane Kiffin benched him and really stopped even entertaining the idea of field goals at the end of the year.
On the other hand, Lincoln has said he's headed for life as a Navy SEAL after football, so there's at least the promise of mental toughness. And Lincoln has made some big kicks for this university as well, and was a Freshman All-American in 2007.
We covered special teams in depth in our 10 Questions for 2010 series. A couple of the high points from that:
- Lincoln's career kicking percentage - 41 of 63, 65% - is better than only the current kickers at Kentucky and Vanderbilt in the SEC.
- Cunningham quietly had a solid year in 2009, 39th in the nation with 42.05 yards per punt
Fans love highly touted freshmen, even when they're kickers, and so the first time Lincoln misses I'm sure we'll be screaming for Palardy. So the only way Lincoln can silence the critics is also the only way he can keep his job: split the uprights.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
More quotes and info
Story from UTSports.com, with quotes
Or, if you like, video of Dooley saying those quotes
Correction
the video is just of him talking after practice, but apparently the bit about the kickers isn’t in there
by Will Shelton on Aug 24, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Quick question:
How much opportunity did Palardy get to kick with the first team? I remember that a lot of the reports I heard had him kicking only with the second team, but I’ll readily admit that I missed a few reports.
If Palardy got a fair shot with the first team, then this probably isn’t a seniority move. If he was stuck with the seconds, then it’s almost certainly seniority at play.
For a while they had split the under and upper classmen into seperate practice sessions.
Bring it across, shape it down
by Getoffmyvols on Aug 24, 2010 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Point being that they had plenty of up close opportunity to evaluate him.
Bring it across, shape it down
by Getoffmyvols on Aug 24, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions
And I figured that to be the case.
But that’s the only real context in which I could imagine favoritism based on class standing. After all, Dooley knows he could very well lose his job over details like that, especially if it results in suboptimal performance on the field. (Not that it will. ;-)
by David Hooper on Aug 24, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Based on a small sample, it seems neither Palardy or Lincoln has come out and seized the job.
Palardy 1-4, 1 blocked
Lincoln 2-4
Palardy 0-2, 1 blocked
Lincoln 1-1
My assumption is with neither really standing out in camp, Dooley went with experience.
Bring it across, shape it down
Perhaps similar to what he's talked about with QBs
that the experience Simms had running even a juco team gives him an enormous advantage over Bray. It’s the punting and kickoffs thing that has me perplexed – leg strength is leg strength, and apparently Cunningham has a stronger leg, and Palardy is better at placement. Hopefully Lincoln will get his head on straight, and this won’t cause Palardy to lose his.
by Will Shelton on Aug 24, 2010 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Well...
3-5 is definitely better than 1-6…
and honestly, Lincoln was very good as a freshman.
I suppose it’s not out of the realm of possibility that he has a good to very good season if he stays healthy and has someone working with him on getting the ball up better.
We should note here
as lots of folks, including me, are not doing a good job expressing this correctly: Cunningham has been a solid punter. Not great, but solid. Lincoln’s had issues and Cunningham too kicking off, but maybe we shouldn’t be too surprised/upset about Palardy or Darr not winning the punting duties.
Yea
And favoritism works both ways… we all know the Tauren Poole story.
Bring it across, shape it down
by Getoffmyvols on Aug 24, 2010 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions
And that's the big thing.
We’re discussing the possibility to perceive favoritism – not an actual charge of favoritism. An academic exercise, if you will.
by David Hooper on Aug 24, 2010 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions
It's OK, IF...
I’m OK with seniority “ruling”, as long as the job gets done. The SEC is as big-time as these guys get right now, and I don’t think anyone coming directly out of high school can be immediately ready for SEC football, no matter where they came from (the ACC might be another matter… but I digress). I think Lincoln deserves the chance. Some student leadership would not be a bad thing for this team. All that said, if he pulls stunts from the ‘07 season, give the "young’un" a shot!
by orangeisbeautiful on Aug 24, 2010 9:57 PM EDT reply actions
Palardy...
May not have the leg strength to be accurate… it sounds strange, but when you are kicking you don’t want to have to annihilate the football on mid range field goals which a lot of freshmen have to try in order to get the distance. Just an idea, that would explain the kickoff issue too.
Of course, if he were to get a shot in game and look good he wouldn’t be the first Tennessee kicker to surprise us after an otherwise unremarkable preseason camp.
Just realized the accompanying photo has Orange pants
Oh pants.
Ahhhhhh, hey what about my cheering?!! Ahhhhhhhh - Swiperboy
Now that this has happened
Anyone else think we should RS Palardy? I know that would leave us without a viable back-up to Lincoln, but wouldn’t you rather have 4 full years of Palardy?
Good chance Darr gets redshirted
Not sure what they’ll do with Palardy other than wait and see
by Will Shelton on Aug 25, 2010 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I have no issue with that...
but as Dooley says, it’s more of an end of year decision… If we don’t need him, then no reason to play him.
Palardy is not the savior. . .
But we NEEDED him to be. . . . [Fulmerized]
by Incipient_Senescence on Aug 25, 2010 10:56 AM EDT reply actions
Navy SEAL
Not buying that argument. I have a hard time believing that pondering one’s future as a Navy SEAL improves one’s mental toughness.* I think that part comes as a result of the training. Unfortunately, he won’t have any eligibility left once he’s good and mentally tough.
*I’m also fairly certain that it doesn’t improve leg strength or accuracy.
...just apologize for not thanking me.
Poorly worded on my part
“the potential for mental toughness” is more along the lines of what I was trying to say
by Will Shelton on Aug 25, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep
You’re not the only one who thinks that.
by orangeisbeautiful on Aug 28, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions

by 























