College Football BlogPoll: Week 1 Ballot Final
Here's our ballot in all it's inglory. Changes were made based on discussion here.
Rocky Top Talk Ballot - Week 2
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boise St. Broncos | 1 |
| 2 | Alabama Crimson Tide | -1 |
| 3 | TCU Horned Frogs | 3 |
| 4 | Ohio St. Buckeyes | -1 |
| 5 | Texas Longhorns | -1 |
| 6 | Oregon Ducks | 4 |
| 7 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | 12 |
| 8 | Iowa Hawkeyes | 1 |
| 9 | Wisconsin Badgers | -- |
| 10 | Miami Hurricanes | 7 |
| 11 | Virginia Tech Hokies | -4 |
| 12 | Oklahoma Sooners | -4 |
| 13 | Penn St. Nittany Lions | 11 |
| 14 | Mississippi St. Bulldogs | -- |
| 15 | Georgia Bulldogs | -1 |
| 16 | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | -3 |
| 17 | Florida St. Seminoles | -2 |
| 18 | Arkansas Razorbacks | 7 |
| 19 | Utah Utes | -3 |
| 20 | Arizona Wildcats | -- |
| 21 | Oklahoma St. Cowboys | -- |
| 22 | South Carolina Gamecocks | -- |
| 23 | Michigan Wolverines | -- |
| 24 | Stanford Cardinal | -4 |
| 25 | LSU Tigers | -- |
| Dropouts: Florida Gators, USC Trojans, Auburn Tigers, Pittsburgh Panthers, Washington Huskies, Cincinnati Bearcats, Clemson Tigers | ||
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings "
Tune in next week as we completely shred things all over again!
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
let me make sure I understand
beat Youngstown State by 30, move up 11 spots
beat western Kentucky by 39, move up 12 spots
beat Tennessee Tech (FCS) by 41, move up 7 spots
beat Samford by 53, drop 2 spots
need a late interception to beat Utah State at home, drop 4 spots
beat Miami(Ohio) by 3TDs, and look terrible doing, fall 22 spots
beat a top 15 team, drop 3 spots
beat UL Lafeyette by 48, drop 1 spot
Interesting movements on this poll. Apparently beating an FCS team is worth moving up 7 spots, and beating a top 15 is worth dropping 2.
In case you weren't around for the explanation
The RTT blog poll is PURELY results based. There is zero looking at what we thought last week and seeing how teams should move up or down. It’s just looking at the total body of work and seeing how it looks. After a few weeks, a computer comes in and does most of the poll, but there’s no data yet. If how they looked in week one is different than what we expected in pre-season, there’s naturally plenty of movement from the preseason poll. Also, in the first few weeks, the poll is extremely volatile. For instance, Florida was in the preseason top 10. Last week, there’s no way they played like a top 25 team. But if they play like a top 10 team next week, they’ll pop right back up there, even though they only beat a middling Big East team.
by Incipient_Senescence on Sep 8, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
This.
Cardsfan, you can expect a lot of movement in the first few weeks. Just remember that nobody actually cares what the first few weeks look like so long as your last few weeks make sense.
Think of it this way: how much faith are you willing to put in my preseason ballot? The movements are all relative to that ballot, and I know for certain that my preseason ballot devalues any paper it’s written on.
Margins of Victory
Are a generally poor judge of performance.
______________________________________________
I will give my North Carolina for Tennessee Today. Apparently.
It appears that not everyone who submits a ballot makes their selections using the same standards
because Florida is ranked #4 and recieved a first place vote.
On that page it says:
The BlogPoll has an explicitly declared poll philosophy that voters are directed to follow.
What is that philsophy?
That's still last week's ballot
by Incipient_Senescence on Sep 8, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't remember the verbatim
but there are basically two tenets: one is to not rely solely on computers (i.e. allow human override if you use computers). We do that, but not all computer users do; some won’t override for any reason whatsoever. You’ll see Cook rant on that nearly every week during the early going, though he rarely spikes those ballots anymore. (When Hinton always does it, Cook has a hard time banning such voters from the poll.)
The other is basically to not be stupid. In theory, we’re supposed to take more time and collect more data before voting – e.g. draft ballots and not having ballots due until Wednesday. Also, we’re supposed to avoid the momentum problem that the regular polls have; if two consecutively ranked teams win and the lower-ranked team appears to be the better team on the season, they should pass the other team. (Basically, don’t try to justify your preseason poll by stubbornly refusing to move teams.)
I infringe a bit by relying on computers more than Cook really cares for, but that’s fine with me. (For a former engineer, he’s surprisingly anti-cpu.)

by 
1
-1






















