Tennessee vs. LSU Game Preview
A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons. Caveats.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Looking at the two teams' only common opponent to date, LSU dominated the Florida team that beat Tennessee. Florida was at an offensive disadvantage against LSU, yes, but Tennessee was at an offensive disadvantage against Florida as well. LSU's full-powered offense didn't do a great deal better against the Gator defense than did Tennessee, despite the Vols re-jiggering their offense on the fly. Of course, Tennessee is now also operating without Tyler Bray, so take all of that for what it's worth.
- LSU's offense is balanced and efficient, but it's the Tiger defense that is elite. And they're not elite because of any one particular player -- although Tyrann Mathieu is absolutely fantastic -- they're elite because they're all scary good and dangerous together.
- To date, Tennessee has been pretty good at kickoff return coverage, but that's going to be tested this week.
- Based on the numbers so far this season, I'm sorry to say that my prediction of zero rushing yards may be overly optimistic. Without Bray and Hunter, Tennessee's offense may be none-dimensional, which is not good news against an elite defense. John Stockdale stoicly acknowledges this fact with only a degree of grim in his determination and refers you to an unspecified date on his non-existent calendar when all of this bamboo-watering will pay off.
Predictions
- LSU 20, Tennessee 6.
Schedule and Animated Drive Charts
|
|
|||
| Oregon Ducks | 9/3/11 | win 40 - 27 | coverage |
| Northwestern St. Demons | 9/10/11 | win 49 - 3 | coverage |
| @ Mississippi St. Bulldogs | 9/15/11 | win 19 - 6 | coverage |
| @ West Virginia Mountaineers | 9/24/11 | win 47 - 21 | coverage |
| Kentucky Wildcats | 10/1/11 | win 35 - 7 | coverage |
| Florida Gators | 10/8/11 | win 41 - 11 | coverage |
|
|
|||
| Montana Grizzlies | 9/3/11 | win 42 - 16 | coverage |
| Cincinnati Bearcats | 9/10/11 | win 45 - 23 | coverage |
| @ Florida Gators | 9/17/11 | loss 23 - 33 | coverage |
| Buffalo Bulls | 10/1/11 | win 41 - 10 | coverage |
| Georgia Bulldogs | 10/8/11 | loss 12 - 20 | coverage |
That's a stellar resume for the Tigers. Double digit wins over the Ducks, who are generally doubling up their other opponents, and solid wins over the Mountaineers and the Gators. The Stockdale Optimist Without a Calendar in me notes, though, that Oregon hasn't played another ranked team and that that Florida team wasn't the same about halfway through the Alabama game the week before. And West Virginia? Overrated at #16 when they played the Tigers. The rest of their slate reads Marshall, Norfolk State, Maryland, Bowling Green, and Connecticut. So chin up.
Florida is the two teams' only common opponent, so the requisite drive charts go here:
Man, look at that early field position for LSU. One could discount all of those blue segmented lines on the theory that the Gators were operating without a quarterback, but it's the solid purple lines and the solid orange lines in which I'm most interested. I expected there to be a dramatic contrast between the Tigers' offensive output against Florida and that of the Vols' adjusting on the fly to the absence of Justin Hunter. But the drive charts don't make it look all that bad. Sure, Tennessee got only 279 against the Gators to LSU's 453, but apart from the post-Hunter mini meltdown, Tennessee moved the ball against Florida fairly well.
It probably all comes down to whether Tennessee's better off against that scary good D with Matt Simms than Florida was with the 15 guys they tried as backups to Brantley.
National Unit Rankings
| OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Offense | 38 | 183.50 | Navy | 366.00 | 6 | Alabama | 217.00 |
| Passing Offense | 100 | 183.33 | Houston | 435.50 | 8 | Arkansas | 336.83 |
| Total Offense | 84 | 366.83 | Houston | 603.67 | 9 | Arkansas | 466.17 |
| Scoring Offense | 21 | 38.50 | Oklahoma St. | 51.40 | 2 | Arkansas | 39.17 |
| Passing Efficiency | 25 | 154.48 | Baylor | 214.07 | 2 | Tennessee | 162.49 |
| Sacks Allowed | 11 | .67 | Boise St. | .40 | 1 | LSU | .67 |
Offensive observations. Stockdale likes the look of that passing offense and wonders why the rushing offense isn't ranked better than 38th in the nation and 6th in the SEC. They are efficient, though, and curiously, they rank pretty significantly better in scoring than they do gaining yards. Huh.
| DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Defense | 4 | 69.17 | Alabama | 39.83 | 2 | Alabama | 39.83 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 6 | 98.46 | UCF | 71.15 | 3 | Alabama | 85.04 |
| Total Defense | 5 | 254.00 | Michigan St. | 173.40 | 2 | Alabama | 191.33 |
| Scoring Defense | 8 | 12.50 | Alabama | 7.00 | 2 | Alabama | 7.00 |
| Pass Defense | 17 | 184.83 | UCF | 100.20 | 5 | South Carolina | 128.50 |
| Sacks | T-42 | 2.17 | Texas A&M | 4.20 | 1 | South Carolina | 2.17 |
| Tackles For Loss | 10 | 8.00 | Marshall | 9.67 | 1 | LSU | 8.00 |
Defensive observations. Um, John Chavis' defense is elite, elite, elite. Top ten in the nation and top three in the SEC in every category except pass defense and sacks, in which they're still quite and pretty good, respectively. It's a very good thing that Stockdale doesn't have a pocket schedule and therefore doesn't know that it only gets worse next week.
| SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Net Punting | 14 | 40.60 | UTEP | 44.15 | 3 | Kentucky | 41.43 |
| Punt Returns | 69 | 7.24 | Ole Miss | 31.71 | 9 | Ole Miss | 31.71 |
| Kickoff Returns | 44 | 22.61 | Temple | 29.60 | 7 | Alabama | 27.30 |
| Turnover Margin | 4 | 1.83 | Rutgers | 2.80 | 1 | LSU | 1.83 |
Special teams and turnovers observations. Eh, not sure what to make of this. At some point turnover margin is a function of solid fundamentals, effort, and intentionality, but it's also quite volatile, so perhaps they're just due for some gift-giving.
Players to Watch
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| OFFENSE | |||
| Rushing | Spencer Ware | T-74 | 72.00 |
| Michael Ford | 54.00 | ||
| Alfred Blue | 36.33 | ||
| Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) | Jarrett Lee | 36 | 148.26 |
| Total Offense | Jarrett Lee | 152.83 | |
| Spencer Ware | 72.00 | ||
| Receptions Per Game | Rueben Randle | 3.83 | |
| Odell Beckham, Jr. | 3.33 | ||
| Receiving Yards Per Game | Rueben Randle | 57 | 74.33 |
| Odell Beckham, Jr. | 44.67 | ||
| Scoring | Drew Alleman | 47 | 8.50 |
| Michael Ford | 6.00 | ||
| Spencer Ware | 5.00 | ||
Offensive Observations. Surprisingly, there's really not much to see here. Sophomore running back Spencer Ware, who I'm sure I will call Spencer Tillman at some point this week, is a solid back, but he ranks only 74th in the nation with 72 yards per game. Put him together with fellow sophomore Michael Ford, though, and you suddenly have 126 YPG. Oh, and then add Alfred Blue, yet another sophomore RB, for another 36. Maybe it's all about the offensive line for these guys.
QB Jarrett Lee is efficient, and his favorite targets appear to be junior WR Rueben Randle and freshman WR Odell Beckham, Jr. Yet their field goal kicker gets 2.5 points per game more than the next leading player. So they're solid and efficient and balanced, but presumably carried by their defense. Cover the kids' eyes, because that's next.
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| DEFENSE | |||
| Interceptions | Morris Claiborne | T-72 | .33 |
| Brandon Taylor | T-72 | .33 | |
| Tyrann Mathieu | T-72 | .33 | |
| Sacks | Sam Montgomery | T-86 | .50 |
| Barkevious Mingo | .33 | ||
| Bennie Logan | .33 | ||
| Tyrann Mathieu | .25 | ||
| Kendrick Adams | .25 | ||
| Tackles | Tyrann Mathieu | 6.83 | |
| Brandon Taylor | 5.67 | ||
| Tackles For Loss | Sam Montgomery | .92 | |
| Tyrann Mathieu | .83 | ||
| Barkevious Mingo | .75 | ||
| Michael Brockers | .75 | ||
| Bennie Logan | .75 | ||
Defense. Well this is interesting. Tyrann Mathieu, who has not one but two names for Verne Lundquist to mispronounce, is getting Heisman attention, and rightfully so if you've seen him play, but he ranks no better than tied for 72nd in any particular defensive category. It's likely because he's more of a turnover manufacturing plant and king of all trades than a defensive specialist. But again, it's looking more and more like LSU is just a fantastic team that is not dependent on any one or any handful of players. They're all good. It's not a giant harpoon we need to avoid this week, it's a swarm of venomous bees. Mathieu's name is on that list up there four times, but there are seven other guys getting into the action as well. Bees, I tell you.
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| SPECIAL TEAMS | |||
| Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game) | |||
| Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Tyrann Mathieu | 38 | 7.46 |
| Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Morris Claiborne | 6 | 29.08 |
| Field Goals | Drew Alleman | T-36 | 1.33 |
| All-Purpose Runners | Spencer Ware | 78.50 | |
| Rueben Randle | 73.50 | ||
Special teams. It looks like our kickoff return yardage defense is also in for a test this week due to Morris Claiborne, who's done the following through five of six games this season: 4 for 83, 2 for 55, 3 for 154 and a TD, 1 for 24, and 2 for 33. Everything else is manageable.
Head to Head Comparisons
![]() |
![]() |
Comps
|
Result Against Comps
|
Prediction
|
|
| UT rush v. LSU rush defense | 84.80 (#114) |
69.17 (#4) |
Georgia (85.83) (#12) |
-21 (Fulmerized) | 0 |
| UT pass v. LSU pass defense | 327.20 (#11) |
184.83 (#17) |
Florida (176) (#12) |
213 | 160 |
| LSU rush v. UT rush defense | 139.60 (#55) |
183.50 (#38) |
Florida (194) (#31) |
134 | 140 |
| LSU pass v. UT pass defense | 204.20 (#33) |
183.33 (#100) |
Florida (186.33) (#98) |
213 | 200 |
| UT scoring offense v. LSU scoring defense | 32.60 (#42) |
12.50 (#8) |
Florida/Georgia (T-19.17) (T-#20) |
23/12 | 6 |
| LSU scoring offense v. UT scoring defense | 20.40 (#29) |
38.50 (#21) |
Cincinnati (45) (#T-9) |
23 | 20 |
As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations, and the general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.
This week's example: On average, we're passing for 327.20 yards per game. LSU is holding opponents to 184.83. The closest comp is Florida, which is holding opponents to 176. Against the Gators, Tennessee got 213, but that was with Tyler Bray rather than Matt Simms, so our informed guess is 160 passing yards for the Vols.
Yeah, all of those comps need to have asterisks by them now that Bray is out. And yes, I'm predicting zero yards rushing. The worst part about that prediction is that it's an optimistic adjustment upward. On the score for Tennessee, I'm banking on some bending by Chavis's D, but I'm also counting on Simms not being sacked before he catches the snap.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Looking at the two teams' only common opponent to date, LSU dominated the Florida team that beat Tennessee. Florida was at an offensive disadvantage against LSU, yes, but Tennessee was at an offensive disadvantage against Florida as well. LSU's full-powered offense didn't do a great deal better against the Gator defense than did Tennessee, despite the Vols re-jiggering their offense on the fly. Of course, Tennessee is now also operating without Tyler Bray, so take all of that for what it's worth.
- LSU's offense is balanced and efficient, but it's the Tiger defense that is elite. And they're not elite because of any one particular player -- although Tyrann Mathieu is absolutely fantastic -- they're elite because they're all scary good and dangerous together.
- To date, Tennessee has been pretty good at kickoff return coverage, but that's going to be tested this week.
- Based on the numbers so far this season, I'm sorry to say that my prediction of zero rushing yards may be overly optimistic. Without Bray and Hunter, Tennessee's offense may be none-dimensional, which is not good news against an elite defense. John Stockdale stoicly acknowledges this fact with only a degree of grim in his determination and refers you to an unspecified date on his non-existent calendar when all of this bamboo-watering will pay off.
Predictions
- LSU 20, Tennessee 6.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You'll call him Spencer Tillman
I’ll call him Andre Ware.
As someone making the trip to Knoxville, I really, really hope this is a lot better than it has any right to be.
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 13, 2011 10:08 AM EDT reply actions
{Sigh}
I dread Saturday. If I have to go to my in-laws’ house and sit in the middle of a dozen LSU fans, I may commit seppuku. I have an orange golf shirt with a white power T I wear on game days, and even when we aren’t playing LSU, I get LSU fans hurling comments at me.
Meh
We’ve got nothing to lose. They are the #1 team in the country and our best players (on a shaky team to begin with) are out injured. If your relatives somehow think beating us under these circumstances is something to crow about, then they’ve got problems.
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
Agree with Birdjam
If we win it’s a Disney movie worthy victory. (Hell our last 3 seasons alone make it worth while)
I hope we win because I love happy endings
But if they beat us now, and think that it’s somehow an amazing awesome thing then it’s as much gloating as our “moral victories”
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
by Joseph Stanley on Oct 13, 2011 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
We really need something
to go right for a change.
I guess the wildcard in all this
is the Miles-factor and third and Chavis?
Maybe if we can keep it close into the 4th quarter, they’ll go into prevent and start playing extremely soft and Simms will look like Joe Montana.
Goodness knows I’ve seen that script before.
If the final score is 20-6
I’ll be really pleased with our defense
by Will Shelton on Oct 13, 2011 11:07 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
seconded
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 13, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
And will be a good game to boot
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
by Joseph Stanley on Oct 13, 2011 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
I predict penalties
Lots of penalties.
For both sides.
I think our team may be over powered, and I think because of that we will see some smash mouth ball.
I also think LSU will be coming in for a jugular: because of Chaney’s return and because I think they want to take the Fans out of the equation early.
Because of that I think LSU is going to bring it’s A game.
I really feel our boys can stand and go toe to toe with, slug for slug.
I just dont think they can do it for as long as LSU can, unfortunately.
I am praying I am wrong
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
by Joseph Stanley on Oct 13, 2011 11:35 AM EDT reply actions
Basically, something like Oregon last year?
by David Hooper on Oct 13, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Don't think LSU has the offense to do that...
although if WE start turning it over, it could get that ugly.
Well, not exactly like Oregon.
But the same general concept of hanging around and surprising but not being able to keep it up for 60 minutes.
by David Hooper on Oct 13, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Basically yes
I think we have an amazingly talented team, but I’ve said before that I think they blink too much after getting hit.
My point being they haven’t quite gotten the play to the whistle mentality. They loose focus, and they get distracted.
I think anger at the fan base may give’m them a bright spark at the beginning, but I also think that same anger will make them hang up their spurs early if things go south. Then it will be just pure meanness on the field between two teams who don’t have much like for each other.
Chaney on the sideline is just going to add to it.
On a positive outlook: I am really hoping Dooley can channel all that emotion and turn it in to some productive energy on the field.
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
by Joseph Stanley on Oct 13, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes
Thank you.
Losing my mind lately
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
by Joseph Stanley on Oct 13, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
We might get 1.
______________________________________________
Pat Summitt is already a legend, and will always be a Hero.
This part
“Offensive observations…..They are efficient, though, and curiously, they rank pretty significantly better in scoring than they do gaining yards. Huh.”
I think some of that has to do with our defense and special teams has kept us on a short field for much of the year. So even when our offense does well (or perhaps I should say WHEN our offense does well?) they don’t have far to go. Thus, less yards. I don’t have stats to back that up, it’s just a guess. It sure seems like we have enjoyed a lot of favorable field position this year.
On the next part, Players To Watch, I’d say you’re on target with noting there’s not a lot to see. I think of our offense a lot like our defense, we don’t have a lot of star power. We don’t have a Tyler Bray and we don’t have a Justin Hunter (damn you guys). We just have a group of guys trying to do a simple job effectively. We’re not flashy by scheme or personnel. And the scheme part makes me happy, because of the Crowton Black Hand Of Offensive Death that’s confused our guys for so long. We have a good tailback in Spencer Ware, but it seems clear to me his assignment is to soften up a defense, and he takes it very seriously. At least it seems to be our philosophy. There have been times (Mississippi State comes to mind) when I thought he could’ve/should’ve broken a play to the outside for a big gain. Based on his Cotton Bowl performance against Texas A&M and other flashes here and there, he seems to have some highlight reel ability. But instead he cuts up inside, follows a blocker as best he can, and usually gets swallowed up by several hats for 4 tough yards. It’s not flashy, and part of me doesn’t understand why you wouldn’t take the big gains if they’re there. But I can’t deny the effect it’s had on opposing defenses down the stretch. Our rush ypp definitely goes up in the 3rd and 4th quarters, enough to be statistically relevant, I think. The other guys start pounding in relief, and it seems the thought is to keep battering ahead until they get tired and be the last team standing. Play-action when the defense starts cheating up and Lee can spot some single man coverage. There’s really not much to it. It’s more or less Tressel-ball, in a way. Run the plays you can do well, don’t mess up, let talent and depth do their job.
Great job on this, by the way. Lots of data presented that is good food for thought. I’m probably not smart enough to put those kinds of numbers together and come up with predictions for a head-to-head meeting. However, I am a big believer in matchups first and foremost, and other situational game aspects. I think stats are a great place to get started, but that they’re mainly just a starting point. Lots of info either hidden in stats or else covered up by stats. For this game in particular, I’m looking for UT to have more success offensively than it seems some of you guys here are. Our LBs are pretty weak in coverage and I think Simms should be able to exploit that for some yards. On the heels of that should come some success in the ground game, though maybe not much. And some of it will depend on what UT’s and LSU’s plan is. Will Dooley have Simms get the ball out quickly every play? That’s good for UT, even if it’s a throw away or a safety valve dump that gets swallowed up. Quick release to the flats is a win against LSU. Will LSU try to get after him or will they go the WVU route and be instructed to push the line back and get their hands up in passing lanes? Both have their merits, but will probably dictate a different flow of the game and different amounts of yardage allowed (possibly points as well). At the risk of sounding argumentative, I don’t think comparing our games to Florida will have a whole lot to do with how we match up against each other. We see a lot of A>B>C>A, like Ark/Bama/LSU last year. UF was without a QB, and it hurt them tremendously in our game. Simms will be a whole different ballgame, even if not the true starter. And of course the intensity and gutsy calls either way could play a part. I don’t think either team has forgotten last year, and both should be amped up for this one (I hope).
we should see a lot of short routes to Rivera and Lane
I hope. Arnett catches lots of those too, come to think of it. But Rivera and Lane will probably be the two biggest targets outside of Da’Rick
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 13, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
My stated belief on stats is that they only help you know where to look.
Understanding the whys and hows is a totally different matter (and where most stats-happy people tend to fall short).
I think there is as much potential for this to be entertaining as there is for it to be ugly. About the only option off the table is a UT blowout. Here’s hoping it’s worthy of its time slot (and no more injuries).
by David Hooper on Oct 13, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes to no more injuries, thank you
We have Auburn next week, I think. Those guys do plenty to injure us annually…..so no help needed from the Vols.
#ChopblockingDorseyStillSucks
If there's one thing that can be said about the Vols: they don't play dirty.
At least they haven’t yet.
by David Hooper on Oct 13, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't mind seeing a bit more chirpiness
Other than Bullard’s occasional outbursts, I want to see some other Vols get physical and mean…but without losing composure.
UT can stay in this one with DL play, but that's what LSU will challenge most
Ware and the Five Cajun Uglies just seem to push the pile every down. Forcing a few drive-stopping negative plays can keep UT in range, and then it’ll be up to Simms to get hot.
Good luck.

by 


























