Volunteers vs. Crimson Tide Game Preview: Brought to you by Prius Nightmare Synergy
A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons. Caveats.
Sketchy Conclusions
- This is going to be a tough game for UT, and not tough in the sense of it being difficult to win. It's going to be hard on morale, so keep it if you can.
- LSU's schedule appears to be a bit stronger than Alabama's to date. They've both played and beaten Florida. Alabama's beaten Arkansas, and LSU's beaten Oregon. The difference is LSU's win over West Virginia as compared to 'Bama's win over Penn State. Still, the difference is marginal, and the Tide's numbers are still better in most departments.
- If there's a soft spot on this Alabama team, it's in the passing game when they have the ball. They are still efficient, but they're not putting up a lot of passing yards. Then again, they don't have to because Trent Richardson is a ball hog.
- I'm not prone to hyperbole, but this may be the best defense we've seen in a decade. Best in the nation against the run, top five against the pass. Averaging a single TD per game.
- Part of what makes the Tide such a difficult opponent is that they are truly a team. Apart from Richardson, no one else really stands out. It's like that frightening commercial where a bunch of people fit together to make a big, freaky looking clump of stuff that sorta looks like a giant body but makes you go, "WHAT IS THAT THING? I NEVER WANT A PRIUS BECAUSE OF THIS COMMERCIAL!" Call it Nightmare Synergy.
Predictions
- Alabama 41, Tennessee 7.
Schedule and Animated Drive Charts
|
|
|||
| Kent St. Golden Flashes | 9/3/11 | win 48 - 7 | coverage |
| @ Penn St. Nittany Lions | 9/10/11 | win 27 - 11 | coverage |
| North Texas Mean Green | 9/17/11 | win 41 - 0 | coverage |
| Arkansas Razorbacks | 9/24/11 | win 38 - 14 | coverage |
| @ Florida Gators | 10/1/11 | win 38 - 10 | coverage |
| Vanderbilt Commodores | 10/8/11 | win 34 - 0 | coverage |
| @ Mississippi Rebels | 10/15/11 | win 52 - 7 | coverage |
|
|
|||
| Montana Grizzlies | 9/3/11 | win 42 - 16 | coverage |
| Cincinnati Bearcats | 9/10/11 | win 45 - 23 | coverage |
| @ Florida Gators | 9/17/11 | loss 23 - 33 | coverage |
| Buffalo Bulls | 10/1/11 | win 41 - 10 | coverage |
| Georgia Bulldogs | 10/8/11 | loss 12 - 20 | coverage |
| LSU Tigers | 10/15/11 | loss 7 - 38 | coverage |
Alabama's averaging nearly 40 points per game while giving up only 7. The win against the Razorbacks is the Tide's best pelt, with Penn State contributing a bit, but it doesn't look like the schedule's been quite as tough as has LSU's.
As with LSU, Florida is the only common opponent between Alabama and Tennessee, so here are those drive charts:
Draw from those what you will. Florida scored 33 against us and 10 against the Tide. We managed 23 against Florida's D, and Alabama got 38. I'm sure there's good news in there somewhere, but it's not like I have all day, you know? There do seem to be a lot of punts for 'Bama against the Gators, but there are still those pesky 38 points.
National Unit Rankings
| OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Offense | 12 | 241.57 | Army | 361.33 | 1 | Alabama | 241.57 |
| Passing Offense | 72 | 219.00 | Houston | 435.50 | 4 | Arkansas | 336.83 |
| Total Offense | 24 | 460.57 | Houston | 603.67 | 2 | Arkansas | 466.17 |
| Scoring Offense | 14 | 39.71 | Wisconsin | 50.17 | 1 | Alabama | 39.71 |
| Passing Efficiency | 44 | 142.24 | Baylor | 206.86 | 5 | LSU | 155.55 |
| Sacks Allowed | T-46 | 1.57 | Stanford | .33 | 2 | LSU | .71 |
Offensive observations. Oh, look, they're worse than your average bear at passing yardage. Oh, look, it doesn't matter because they score almost 40 points every game. Oh, look, they're vulnerable to sacks. Oh, right. We don't believe in sacks.
| DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Defense | 1 | 38.14 | Alabama | 38.14 | 1 | Alabama | 38.14 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 2 | 84.91 | Michigan St. | 84.35 | 1 | Alabama | 84.91 |
| Total Defense | 1 | 184.14 | Alabama | 184.14 | 1 | Alabama | 184.14 |
| Scoring Defense | 1 | 7.00 | Alabama | 7.00 | 1 | Alabama | 7.00 |
| Pass Defense | 5 | 146.00 | Michigan St. | 119.17 | 2 | South Carolina | 133.71 |
| Sacks | 46 | 2.14 | Texas A&M | 4.33 | 1 | Alabama | 2.14 |
| Tackles For Loss | 10 | 8.14 | Marshall | 9.57 | 1 | Alabama | 8.14 |
Defensive observations. This is where you either run screaming back into the poppy field or stand there trembling and hope that Toto saves the day with the big reveal that it's all just a small man with buttons and levers and smoke and mirrors.
| SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Net Punting | 69 | 36.48 | UTEP | 44.09 | 10 | Kentucky | 41.43 |
| Punt Returns | 17 | 13.00 | Ole Miss | 31.71 | 3 | Ole Miss | 31.71 |
| Kickoff Returns | 12 | 26.33 | Temple | 29.60 | 1 | Alabama | 26.33 |
| Turnover Margin | T-20 | .71 | Rutgers | 2.17 | 3 | LSU | 1.86 |
Special teams and turnovers observations. This is where we hope that Devrin Young is our Toto.
Players to Watch
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| ALL OF THEM | |||
This is where you slap your knee at my awesome joke.
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| OFFENSE | |||
| Rushing | Trent Richardson | 4 | 130.29 |
| Eddie Lacy | T-76 | 69.83 | |
| Jalston Fowler | 43.14 | ||
| Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) | A.J. McCarron | 32 | 148.63 |
| Total Offense | A.J. McCarron | 77 | 193.43 |
| Trent Richardson | 130.29 | ||
| Eddie Lacy | 69.83 | ||
| Receptions Per Game | Marquis Maze | T-79 | 4.86 |
| Receiving Yards Per Game | Marquis Maze | 53.71 | |
| Scoring | Trent Richardson | 3 | 13.71 |
| Jeremy Shelley | T-36 | 8.86 | |
| Eddie Lacy | 5.00 | ||
Offensive Observations. Summary: Trent Richardson is awesome and A.J. McCarron is efficient. Seriously, Bill Connely is right. You load up to try to stop Richardson and take your chances in the passing game. So expect Tennessee's safeties to crowd the line again and the corners to be tested in single coverage. Best shot, even if the corners get beat again and it doesn't work all game.
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| DEFENSE | |||
| Interceptions | DeMarcus Milliner | .29 | |
| Sacks | Courtney Upshaw | T-80 | .50 |
| Nick Gentry | .36 | ||
| DeQuan Menzie | .21 | ||
| Tackles | |||
| Tackles For Loss | Courtney Upshaw | T-17 | 1.50 |
| Dont'a Hightower | .71 | ||
| Ed Stinson | .71 | ||
Defense. I wonder what it is about these guys because apart from senior LB Courtney Upshaw, no individual is really standing out nationally on a defense that is, as a unit, best in the nation. Equal distribution of wealth, perhaps? Is Nick Saban really a communist?
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| SPECIAL TEAMS | |||
| Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game) | |||
| Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Marquis Maze | 16 | 13.36 |
| Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | |||
| Field Goals | Jeremy Shelley | T-44 | 1.29 |
| All-Purpose Runners | Trent Richardson | 15 | 162.00 |
| Marquis Maze | 43 | 131.29 | |
| Eddie Lacy | 84.67 | ||
Special teams. I was fixing to say that it really wasn't fair to have Richardson returning kicks, too, but he's only attempted two all year. Marquis Maze is dangerous returning punts, but it's not like we're 110th in net punting or anything. We just have to not punt is all.
Head to Head Comparisons
![]() |
![]() |
Comps
|
Result Against Comps
|
Prediction
|
|
| UT rush v. Alabama rush defense | 89 (#114) |
38.14 (#1) |
LSU (75.14) (#6) |
111 | 70 |
| UT pass v. Alabama pass defense | 294 (#25) |
146 (#5) |
Florida (168.43) (#10) |
288 | 150 |
| Alabama rush v. UT rush defense | 159.67 (#69) |
241.57 (#12) |
LSU (194.43) (#29) |
260 | 260 |
| Alabama pass v. UT pass defense | 190.67 (#24) |
219 (#72) |
Cincinnati (208) (#82) |
230 | 220 |
| UT scoring offense v. Alabama scoring defense | 28.33 (#62) |
7 (#1) |
LSU (11.71) (7) |
7 | 7 |
| Alabama scoring offense v. UT scoring defense | 23.33 (#44) |
39.71 (#14) |
LSU (38.43) (20) |
38 | 41 |
As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations, and the general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.
This week's example: On average, we're running for 89 yards per game. Alabama is holding opponents to less than half that. The closest comp is LSU, which is holding opponents to 75.14. Against the Tigers, Tennessee got 111, which was perhaps a result of a stronger focus on the running game with Matt Simms at QB. So with all of that, our informed guess is 70 rushing yards for the Vols. Expecting a team ranked 114th nationally to get more on the ground than the #1 team is allowing may be foolhardy, but I think it's our only shot, and that last week is more an indicator of who we are now than were the previous weeks. So yeah, 70 yards rushing, best guess.
And yeah, I'm guessing Tennessee's total yards is roughly equal to Alabama's passing yards and less than their rushing yards.
Sketchy Conclusions
- This is going to be a tough game for UT, and not tough in the sense of it being difficult to win. It's going to be hard on morale, so keep it if you can.
- LSU's schedule appears to be a bit stronger than Alabama's to date. They've both played and beaten Florida. Alabama's beaten Arkansas, and LSU's beaten Oregon. The difference is LSU's win over West Virginia as compared to 'Bama's win over Penn State. Still, the difference is marginal, and the Tide's numbers are still better in most departments.
- If there's a soft spot on this Alabama team, it's in the passing game when they have the ball. They are still efficient, but they're not putting up a lot of passing yards. Then again, they don't have to because Trent Richardson is a ball hog.
- I'm not prone to hyperbole, but this may be the best defense we've seen in a decade. Best in the nation against the run, top five against the pass. Averaging a single TD per game.
- Part of what makes the Tide such a difficult opponent is that they are truly a team. Apart from Richardson, no one else really stands out. It's like that frightening Prius commercial where a bunch of people fit together to make a big, freaky looking clump of stuff that sorta looks like a giant body but makes you go, "WHAT IS THAT THING? I NEVER WANT A PRIUS BECAUSE OF THIS COMMERCIAL!" Call it Nightmare Synergy.
Predictions
- Alabama 41, Tennessee 7.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I expect the Vols defense to play better than UF's and I think the vols score more than UF's offense.
That’s not saying Tennessee is better than UF at this point of course but I feel that Simms will have much less pressure on him away from home. The vibe surrounding him is really negative and I think he will actually be a little more loose. Also Bama doesnt really stretch the field much with the passing game and they use a power running game much different than UF’s speedy stuff which attacks the edges. Not that I think Bama isnt capable of throwing deep balls and running jet sweeps but I dont see Saban changing anything at this point. They will execute what they do well. TN could play relatively well versus a power run game and a short passing attack imo. I’d say more like 31-17 bama.
my personal take on the "stretch the field" issue
is that the coaching staff has been bringing mccarron along incrementally each game. vs kent state they kind of threw everything out there to get a comparative standard for him and sims but, since then, it’s been a progressive approach. things were very simple against penn state and have been more and more complex each game.
while there have been a few long throws mixed in there, i wouldn’t be surprised if the coaching staff tries to implement this phase of the game more on saturday as a live fire warmup for the lsu game when it might be a matter of necessity to have.
Remember the Rose Bowl: The Story of the Alabama Crimson Tide & the Grandaddy of Them All
Could be a year-to-year growth thing, too.
It’s tough to really expand the playbook in the middle of the year beyond maybe 1-2 plays a week. I imagine, if anything, they’re spending a lot of time in the film room working on reads and it just looks like they’re expanding the playbook.
(Incidentally, I’m about 90% sure this is what caused Bray to go all nuts to start the year – it wasn’t the new plays as much as it was the growth process and film.)
Formerly 'snail. You get used to it after a while.
by Chris Pendley on Oct 20, 2011 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I would expect almost the opposite due to the LSU game the following weekend.
Saban will hold back as much as possible to keep LSU from getting any film study. I think Saban plays TN as vanilla as possible as long as Bama can remain in control. He wont show anything new to LSU. He had to open the play book a little vs Penn st, UF, and Arkansas but I dont expect he will show anything else unless its absolutely necessary.
by cerebralfish on Oct 20, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
thirded
especially the teeth-brushing part
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 20, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
The Vols do not score; this is a Saban-names-the-level-of-humiliation special.
I love Dooley and the Vols. The coaches really are doing something with not very much; and the players really are trying hard. So, this is not “on the ledge, ready to jump” thinking.
But we are so outmanned at every position that I cannot think of one single spot at which we have equal or better players than Alabama. I really do believe that Bama’s second string could beat us, straight up. Three number one classes and another top 5 class, plus Bama coaching, will do that for you. Especially when playing a cupboard-bare, injury-depleted team.
Out of respect for their friendship, Saban will keep this under 50 by putting in second and third teamers. It will stay under 50 as long as our guys continue to fight.
I’d give the 28 points and take the Tide. It hurts my heart to type that.
We're watching when you are not. Protecting against another 9-11.
I'd probably take our WR class against theirs, but that's if healthy.
Same goes for QB. But absent Hunter and Bray …yeah, well, I can see that.
Formerly 'snail. You get used to it after a while.
by Chris Pendley on Oct 20, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
i'm leaning more towards the
“we were never really in the game but it’s not a total massacre on the scoreboard” result. the difference between my vision and yours is probably what happens with turnovers. i think we cover though.
Pearl for Life.
The Dual Threat, Official Enforcer/Stat Geek of MCM.
I understand the turnover angle, and you could be right if Bama coughs up the ball
but they don’t. Ever.
And, we haven’t exactly been stellar in that category lately – forcing TO’s.
Don’t get me wrong… I really, really hope you are right but we are playing the best college football team I’ve seen in at least 10 years.
And, i will go on record now, by picking Bama over LSU – by double digits.
We're watching when you are not. Protecting against another 9-11.
Spread
I believe we have covered the spread every week except the North Texas game. It was 47 points and we only beat them by 41.
This seems like a makeable spread
Kills me to say that.
Who cares?
The world is ending Friday anyways.
Seriously though, most of those passing yards in the Cinci game came when it was out of reach. We should be able to handle their passing game without too much trouble. If we can just slow down the run game enough to force some punts we could conceivably be in the game late.
GO VOLS
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
Now thats out of the way
And my moment of delirium has passed ahem
If we can’t stop Trent Richardson we cant stop Alabama. its pretty much that simple.
I took Tennessee to win this in our pick’ems. Just because I’m rampantly insane and believe in fairytale’s doesn’t mean anything at all in regards to my decision making.
And stop looking at me like that.
BloodSpite
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football." -John Heisman
"Nobody despises to lose more than I do. That's got me into trouble over the years, but it also made a man of mediocre ability into a pretty good coach". -Woody Hayes
by Joseph Stanley on Oct 20, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
If using Florida as a common opponent between LSU and Bama
You must remember Alabama played Florida in Gainesville at full strength while LSU got them in Baton Rouge with a third string true freshman QB and no Jeffery Demps.
"Never start a fight with an old man...if he's too old to fight, he'll probably just kill you."
that's not entirely fair
because they were only at full strength for a quarter and a half.
But regardless, we were using Florida as the only common opponent between Tennessee and Bama. And we really got them at full strength
Heel for school, Vol for life!
Bolts, Preds, Canes (childhood team, home state team, hometown team). Canes mini-STH. Southern hockey solidarity!
by Incipient_Senescence on Oct 21, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
I was referring to this
LSU’s schedule appears to be a bit stronger than Alabama’s to date. They’ve both played and beaten Florida.
"Never start a fight with an old man...if he's too old to fight, he'll probably just kill you."

by 

























