Tennessee-Georgia Game Preview
A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons. Caveats.
Sketchy Conclusions
- Five weeks into the season, Georgia has not had a game without a turnover, and they've had multiple turnovers in multiple games. They're also fumbling the ball quite a bit more often than they're actually losing it.
- The Bulldogs have a decent, balanced offense featuring both QB Aaron Murray and RB Isaiah Crowell, but a downright scary defense on the level of both Florida and LSU.
- Factors that shed some skepticism on this entire analysis include the fact that Tennessee has now had two weeks to figure out how to live without Justin Hunter (they were doing it on the fly against Florida) and that linebacker Cornelius Washington won't be playing against the Vols.
- Georgia's roster is absolutely full of names you'd see on law firm letterhead.
Predictions
Georgia 33, Tennessee 31.Tennessee 34, Georgia 33. Um, home field! Yeah.
Schedule and Animated Drive Charts
|
|
|||
| Boise St. Broncos | 9/3/11 | loss 21 - 35 | coverage |
| South Carolina Gamecocks | 9/10/11 | loss 42 - 45 | coverage |
| Coastal Carolina Chanticleers |
9/17/11 |
win 59 - 0 | coverage |
| @ Mississippi Rebels | 9/24/11 | win 27 - 13 | coverage |
| Mississippi St. Bulldogs | 10/1/11 | win 24 - 10 | coverage |
|
|
|||
| Montana Grizzlies | 9/3/11 | win 42 - 16 | coverage |
| Cincinnati Bearcats | 9/10/11 | win 45 - 23 | coverage |
| @ Florida Gators | 9/17/11 | loss 23 - 33 | coverage |
| Buffalo Bulls | 10/1/11 | win 41 - 10 | coverage |
Hmm. Kicking off the season with two losses to Boise and the Gamecocks (band name woo) is nothing to be ashamed of, but neither is following it up with wins over Carolina of the Coastal variety and the Mississippi schools anything to be especially proud of. The maroon Bulldog victory is the best pelt on the resume so far, but what are we to make of that? Of course, you could change the variables and end up with a similar analysis of Tennessee, so there.
Two drive charts for this week, one for the win over Mississippi St. and one for the loss to the Gamecocks:
We saw the dog fight chart yesterday, noting the favorable field position on the first two TDs, the three interceptions, and the missed field goal. There's a lot to unpack in that South Carolina chart, including red zone difficulties, another missed field goal, and another three turnovers, all three of which appear to have quickly converted into TDs. Probably can't count on that again. Or can we?
National Unit Rankings
| OFFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Offense | 46 | 176.20 | Georgia Tech | 378.20 | 6 | Alabama | 229.80 |
| Passing Offense | 56 | 237.60 | Houston | 451.20 | 3 | Arkansas | 351.80 |
| Total Offense | T-52 | 413.80 | Houston | 610.00 | 4 | Arkansas | 471.80 |
| Scoring Offense | 35 | 34.60 | Oregon | 52.00 | 5 | Arkansas | 39.40 |
| Passing Efficiency | 26 | 154.51 | Georgia Tech | 260.48 | 2 | Tennessee | 175.38 |
| Sacks Allowed | 94 | 2.60 | Oregon | .25 | 10 | LSU | .60 |
Offensive observations. Mmm. Despite the interceptions noted in the drive charts, Georgia has a pretty good passing efficiency. They're also okay in scoring offense, although nothing to get over-excited about. Everything else is sort of blah, and sacks allowed earns them an #opportunityisnowhere award.
| DEFENSIVE RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Rushing Defense | 32 | 107.00 | Alabama | 39.60 | 5 | Alabama | 39.60 |
| Pass Efficiency Defense | 11 | 99.47 | UCF | 73.36 | 5 | Alabama | 83.34 |
| Total Defense | T-7 | 258.60 | Michigan St. | 173.40 | 2 | Alabama | 191.60 |
| Scoring Defense | 32 | 20.60 | Alabama | 8.40 | 6 | Alabama | 8.40 |
| Pass Defense | 4 | 151.60 | UCF | 103.50 | 2 | South Carolina | 150.80 |
| Sacks | T-53 | 2.00 | Texas A&M | 4.50 | 3 | South Carolina | 2.60 |
| Tackles For Loss | 21 | 7.40 | Louisville | 9.00 | 2 | LSU | 8.80 |
Defensive observations. But, but, but. Defense is solid, at least according to the numbers alone. I had absolutely no idea that their pass defense was so good, so this could be one of those irrestible force meets immovable object games with Tyler Bray going against the Dawg defense. They're balanced, too, with a rush defense that ranks 32nd and a total defense that is tied for 7th. That puts them hobnobbing with teams like LSU and Florida.
| SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS | |||||||
| Category | National Rank |
Actual | National Leader |
Actual | Conf Rank |
SEC Leader | Actual |
| Net Punting | 52 | 37.10 | UTEP | 44.15 | 9 | Kentucky | 41.00 |
| Punt Returns | 63 | 7.80 | Ole Miss | 31.71 | 8 | Ole Miss | 31.71 |
| Kickoff Returns | 21 | 24.53 | Nebraska | 30.58 | 3 | Alabama | 30.00 |
| Turnover Margin | T-41 | .40 | Rutgers | 2.75 | 4 | LSU | 1.80 |
Special teams and turnovers observations. They're okay at kickoff returns, but nothing special anywhere else on special teams.
Players to Watch
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| OFFENSE | |||
| Rushing | Isaiah Crowell | 27 | 103.00 |
| Richard Samuel | 30.75 | ||
| Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game) | Aaron Murray | 29 | 152.81 |
| Total Offense | Aaron Murray | 66 | 213.40 |
| Isaiah Crowell | 103.00 | ||
| Receptions Per Game | Malcolm Mitchell | 4.40 | |
| Orson Charles | 3.20 | ||
| Tavarres King | 2.40 | ||
| Receiving Yards Per Game | Malcolm Mitchell | 62.40 | |
| Orson Charles | 51.20 | ||
| Scoring | Blair Walsh | T-74 | 7.80 |
| Orson Charles | 4.80 | ||
Offensive Observations. The Bulldogs' appear to be sort of a dual-threat, with running back Isaiah Crowell and quarterback Aaron Murray both being Real Deals. Crowell's averaging over 100 yards per game, and Murray's spreading the ball around to multiple targets. Freshman wide receiver Malcolm Mitchell appears to be the go-to guy, getting both more catches and more yards, but junior tight end Orson Charles isn't far behind him. Incidentally, those two could have been the names of the snobby millionaires in Trading Places. Am I right? In fact, I'm going to call them Mortimer and Randolph this week, and I suggest you do the same.
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| DEFENSE | |||
| Interceptions | Bacarri Rambo | T-1 | 1.00 |
| Branden Smith | .20 | ||
| Sanders Commings | .20 | ||
| Brandon Boykin | .20 | ||
| Shawn Williams | .20 | ||
| Sacks | Cornelius Washington | T-49 | .70 |
| Jarvis Jones | T-75 | .60 | |
| Tackles | Jarvis Jones | 5.60 | |
| Michael Gilliard | 5.60 | ||
| Tackles For Loss | Jarvis Jones | T-77 | 1.10 |
| Cornelius Washington | .90 | ||
Defense. Oh my goodness. Yeah, you can strike Cornelius (what's with these Thurston Howell, III names?) Washington from that list, as he's got other things to do, but the actually-appropriately-named Bacarri Rambo will ruin your day and get the girl, sir. Jarvis Jones also likes to be all up in your backfield, although he's riding solo this week. The secondary appears loaded with Friends of Rambo, any of whom can Do Bad Things if you focus too much on the star back there.
| Category | Player | National Rank |
Actual |
| SPECIAL TEAMS | |||
| Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game) | Drew Butler | T-8 | 47.00 |
| Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Branden Smith | 36 | 7.78 |
| Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game) | Brandon Boykin | 35 | 24.53 |
| Field Goals | Blair Walsh | T-43 | 1.20 |
| All-Purpose Runners | Brandon Boykin | 87 | 113.80 |
| Isaiah Crowell | 89 | 113.40 | |
Special teams. The Bulldogs lead the nation in Bs on Special Teams, and I'm telling you, this reads like especially alliterative law firm letterhead. So yeah, Drew Butler can punt. Their return guys are pretty good, and despite missing field goals on the drive charts we've looked at, the field goaler ranks 43rd in the nation, so don't get too carried away.
Head to Head Comparisons
![]() |
![]() |
Comps
|
Result Against Comps
|
Prediction
|
|
| UT rush v. Georgia rush defense | 111 (#98) |
107 (#32) |
Florida (90.40) (#18) |
-9 (*!$%) | 50 |
| UT pass v. Georgia pass defense | 336.50 (#11) |
151.60 (#4) |
Florida (168.20) (#12) |
288 | 280 |
| Georgia rush v. UT rush defense | 139.75 (#56) |
176.20 (#46) |
Buffalo (148.60) (#59) |
148 | 170 |
| Georgia pass v. UT pass defense | 198.50 (#35) |
237.60 (#56) |
Florida (203.60) (#86) |
213 | 200 |
| UT scoring offense v. Georgia scoring defense | 37.75 (#21) |
20.60 (#32) |
Florida (14.80) (#13) |
23 | 31 |
| Georgia scoring offense v. UT scoring defense | 20.50 (#31) |
34.60 (#35) |
Florida (34.20) (#38) |
33 | 33 |
As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations, and the general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.
This week's example: On average, we're passing for 336.50 yards per game. Georgia is holding opponents to 151.60. The closest comp is Florida, which is holding opponents to 168.20. Against the Gators, Tennessee got 288, significantly more than the Gators were allowing, but still less than the Vols' average. So our informed guess is 280 passing yards for the Vols.
Here's the thing, though. Florida appears to be the best comp on most categories, but the Vols were learning how to play without Justin Hunter on the fly in Gainesville. They're now had two weeks to adjust. How much will it matter? That's the key question, I think. Georgia's pass defense is excellent, but so is Tennessee's passing offense. It may all come down to the running game, and unfortunately, theirs looks better than ours. But how much will the loss of Cornelius Washington factor in to that particular equation? So flip flop on this one all the way through kickoff, folks. It'll be fun!
Sketchy Conclusions
- Five weeks into the season, Georgia has not had a game without a turnover, and they've had multiple turnovers in multiple games. They're also fumbling the ball quite a bit more often than they're actually losing it.
- The Bulldogs have a decent, balanced offense featuring both QB Aaron Murray and RB Isaiah Crowell, but a downright scary defense on the level of both Florida and LSU.
- Factors that shed some skepticism on this entire analysis include the fact that Tennessee has now had two weeks to figure out how to live without Justin Hunter (they were doing it on the fly against Florida) and that linebacker Cornelius Washington won't be playing against the Vols.
- Georgia's roster is absolutely full of names you'd see on law firm letterhead.
Predictions
Georgia 33, Tennessee 31.Tennessee 34, Georgia 33. Um, home field! Yeah.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Georgia's roster is absolutely full of names you'd see on law firm letterhead."
I think you’re more likely to see them on the “RE:” line. rimshot
Lou Brock loves Lamp.
Ha
Nice.
Chief Editor, Rocky Top Talk. Chief in Charge of Woo, Gameday Depot.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Oct 5, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
If I saw Rambo on a law firm's letterhead,
I’d go to a different law firm.
by David Hooper on Oct 5, 2011 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions
There’s a firm here in the Tri Cities that’s called something like “Booze, Herrin, and Rambo” or something like that.
Well close enough.
Chief Editor, Rocky Top Talk. Chief in Charge of Woo, Gameday Depot.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Oct 5, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Indeed
Chief Editor, Rocky Top Talk. Chief in Charge of Woo, Gameday Depot.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Oct 6, 2011 6:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Holy crap. Have we been relegated to the MAC?
by spiritofthehill on Oct 5, 2011 10:55 AM EDT reply actions
Yes!
No. Copy and paste error, obvs.
Chief Editor, Rocky Top Talk. Chief in Charge of Woo, Gameday Depot.
by Joel Hollingsworth on Oct 5, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
With 3 weeks to prepare(Of course I didnt count Buffalo as anything but a pre-UGA scrimmage)
and UGA being without a week to look ahead and prepare, this is ideal for Tennessee to get a nice win. I think it comes down to Bray’s pass attempts. If he throws 45-50 times TN loses. If he can manage to throw under 40, and preferrably closer to 30 TN wins. He’s a great young QB but when you throw that many times you are going to have turnovers vs a solid D. Thought they have a potent offense capable of scoring a lot of points I think it will be key for TN to keep the game short and low scoring to protect the ball. TN 24-21.
When did we join the MAC?
Feel like I should note…
The only good QB UGA has faced was Kellen Moore, and here’s his line…
28-34 for 261 yards 3TDs 1INT aka an 82% completion rate
Outside of that game they’ve played one guy in the top 100 in passing efficiency in #96 Chris Relf. Not to mention holding Coastal Carolina to less than 50 yards passing really skews the passing efficiency defense.
Kellen Moore is better than good
The kid is one of the top 3 (if not the top) QB’s in the country. The 82% completion rate was due to the great adjustment Boise St. made in their game plan. After trying unsuccessfully to throw down field (for the most part) in the first half they went to short, underneath routes, which, sadly, we didn’t adjust to. I’m not saying Bray will not be able to pass on us because if Ole Miss and Miss St. had a decent QB those game would likely have been closer but our defense seems more comfortable now compared to the Boise game. I expect a close game and wish UT the best of luck the rest of the season.
I may be a bit premature here...
but at least this season, Bray has been every bit as good as Kellen.
200 more passing yards, 2 fewer INTs, and an equal number of TDs vs. superior competition in general. Moore does have him beat on completion percentage (74% v. 69%), but Bray outpaces him on passer rating due to the INT differential.
Kellen Moore is a good college QB vs the schedule he plays, but
he only really has to study film on 2-3 teams a year MAX. He is undersized and generally plays scrubs. This year his resume will include a mediocre UGA team, an unranked TCU, and a schedule full of layups. The NFL wont be very interested at all as they would be taking a chance on a guy with only a few games to measure how good he really is. This would be like a college recruiting a kid who dominates 1-2A high school level competition.
by cerebralfish on Oct 6, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not trying to compare the two
There’s not enough data for a fair comparison. All I’m saying is Moore has proven to be an exceptional QB. I’m not saying Bray is not a good QB, he’s having a terrific season so far. However I’ll reserve judgement on how good a QB he is until after his junior year, at least.
Not sure how big losing Washington will be.
He’s not normally the pass-rushing OLB. That’s Jarvis Jones, who plays on the other side. Most of Washington’s sacks came last week and they were the product of playing aggressive outride rush defense. Ray Drew, the hotshot freshman, is likely to get some reps at his spot. Also, given the amount of spread formations you guys use, we’ll likely spend a good amount of time in Nickel where we run a 4-2-5 instead of a 3-4-4. I’d be more concerned about his loss if you guys were a great running team.
But it’s looking to be a close game, and every little loss matters.

by 


























