Tennessee Lady Vols 85, UCLA Bruins 64. What if they played a complete game?
The Lady Vols kept their winning streak going with a solid 85-64 win over a UCLA Bruins team that fully believe that better things are in store for them in the future. Undersized and undertalented, the Bruins played a feisty game, attempting to disrupt every dribble and every pass that the Lady Vols made. In a more normal night, the plan might well have given the turnover-prone Lady Vols fits, but tonight was bizarre; despite some lackluster play on the defensive end, Tennessee shot like the goal was six feet wide, scoring at a pace that almost nobody in the country could hope to keep up with.
At one point in the first half, Tennessee was 18 of 20 from the field. They didn't do it with a lot of easy layups and chip shots, but were simply hitting every shot they tried. On the night, Tennessee ended with 69.2% field goal shooting, 7/14 from downtown, and an assist to turnover ratio of 1.1. It was an offensive performance that quietly obliterated any hope that UCLA had of pulling off the upset. And it seemingly came out of nowhere. Tennessee's previous best FG percentage was 49.2% against Pepperdine in the season opener, meaning they were a full 20 point better tonight than at any time in the season. That's what can rightly be called an outlier.
But the outlier isn't entirely an outlier. Tennessee did hit shots from just about everywhere, but it should be noted that those shots were usually pretty good shots with open looks. On offense, Tennessee rotated well and made effective use of interior passes to find open looks at the basket, then capitalized on their opportunities. They even made a respectable number of layups - a performance that has been oddly lacking over the last few weeks. In short, the offense worked as it was designed to work by allowing Tennessee's incredible depth of talent to find the shots they liked.
The defensive end is another story. The defense wasn't bad, per se, but the results weren't what Tennessee hoped for. UCLA had 19 offensive rebounds to Tennessee's 24 defensive boards - a mark that should just never happen when you have position and when you have a height advantage at every position on the floor. With the refs allowing a physical game (which, by the way, was very fun to watch), UCLA should never have been allowed so many second, third, and fourth chances on offense.
WHAT COULD BE
This Lady Vols team has shown some incredible performances on offense, defense, in transition, and on the glass. They have even improved their free throw shooting to some very respectable marks at times. But the maddening thing is that they have never put things all together at once. Against UCLA, it was the offense. Against Texas, it was defense. Against everybody except UCLA and Miami, it was rebounds. If all the facets of the game would ever come together for this Tennessee squad, it would be one of the most beautiful things to watch. It's all there, and it's all been on display; they just have to figure out how to get it all on the floor at one time.
KUDOS
Meighan Simmons. That girl had one of the best games of her career. She was one of the most solid defenders on the night, and even had a very strong block in the paint in the second half. Her shots fell; 8/14 from the floor and 2/5 from three with 39 minutes of play, zero fouls, a steal, and that one spectacular block. She was the clear winner of breadsticks tonight, and it was a huge relief to see her hit her shots. Is the sophomore slump over? Who knows. But at least she had one good game before the pivotal Stanford match on the 20th.

Congratulations, Meighan!
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So a few things I'm curious on:
- What was causing Simmons’ good night? Was it pacing, better arc, what?
- How’d Glory look? Saw some comments in the game thread that she was looking good; I figured this would be her type of game if they let them play, but seems UCLA’s percentage board numbers were better than I’d expect.
- Is Stricklen okay?
Formerly 'snail. You get used to it after a while.
Well,
— I’m not exactly sure what the difference was with Meighan. She was a full speed, but it appeared to be under more control. She had a few shots (e.g. the layups) that just looked awkward, but they worked. But there were times where she made really smart decisions, especially on the rundown of the overthrown baseball pass. (It’s on the highlight video at utladyvols.com and is worth seeing. Her “run past all 5 defenders” layup is there too.)
— I thought Glory looked ok, but just wasn’t dominant on the board like we’re used to. I didn’t pay enough attention to see if UCLA rotated to get her away from the post before they shot, but I suspect that was a part of it. As far as the team rebounds go, it felt like Tennessee lost a lot of boards because they had multiple people grabbing the ball at the same time, and it would then pop loose and head toward a UCLA player who was otherwise boxed out. Not sure if that was an actual trend, but I did happen on occasion. Either way, they could do better.
— Stricklen should be fine. It was evidently some sort of stomach discomfort, but she played much of the second half.
by David Hooper on Dec 18, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions
I should also say:
Much will be made of the turnovers, but UCLA has built their team to press the issue with ball control, and they’re pretty good at it. They constantly try to bat away the ball in passes, dribble, and even when a player is just holding it. They press a lot, and generally live and die by turnovers. It worked on occasion, but it also cost them by allowing some very easy shots when Tennessee broke through. Like a lot of things, they could have done better, but it certainly wasn’t crippling, especially without Ariel.
Speaking of Ariel, here’s the list of players I saw running the point last night: Stricklen, Simmons, Spani, Manning (!), and Burdick (!!). You have to expect a couple of turnovers in that condition, but it wasn’t a disaster either.
Any word on when she'll return?
Like, say, in the next two days plzkthx?
Formerly 'snail. You get used to it after a while.
by Chris Pendley on Dec 18, 2011 2:13 PM EST up reply actions
Ariel?
Not for another week or two, last I heard.
/sigh
by David Hooper on Dec 18, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions

by 























