Tennessee Volunteers Vs. Ole Miss Rebels: Game Preview And Stat Analysis

A weekly look at our upcoming opponent's recent history, with animated drive charts, links to SB Nation game pages, and statistical comparisons.

CAVEATS: You know the drill. Also, this: all of the following information is gleaned exclusively from the NCAA statistics and does not account for things like injuries, shared playing time, and other stuff difficult to see in the stats from a bird's eye view. As always, this is a long post, so I've put the conclusions and predictions before and after the meat. You're not seeing double.

 

Sketchy Conclusions

• Ole Miss has played Auburn, Alabama, and Arkansas, but that's about it. The rest of the schedule is loaded with poor teams, so their stats should probably be discounted slightly. Tennessee has compiled its stats against a much stronger schedule.
• Forget about Jeremiah Masoli's arm. It's fine, but the strength of Ole Miss's offense is their ground game, which features running back Brandon Bolden, who ranks one spot behind Tauren Poole in the national rankings, and Jeff Scott and Masoli, who together add nearly another 100 rushing yards.
• The Rebels' defense is not good, but they do quite well in sacks and tackles for loss, most of which come not from defensive linemen, but from linebackers.
• Mystery! Ole Miss ranks second in the nation in punt returns, but no single player ranks nationally. They must be dabbling with a lot of different players, but what's the whole story here? Homework for y'all.

Predictions

• Tennessee 34, Ole Miss 32. But that's got a good deal of post-Memphis WOO in it, so beware.

Schedule and Animated Drive Charts

Jacksonville St. Gamecocks	9/4/10	loss 48 - 49	coverage
@ Tulane Green Wave	9/11/10	win 27 - 13	coverage
Vanderbilt Commodores	9/18/10	loss 14 - 28	coverage
Fresno St. Bulldogs	9/25/10	win 55 - 38	coverage
Kentucky Wildcats	10/2/10	win 42 - 35	coverage
@ Alabama Crimson Tide	10/16/10	loss 10 - 23	coverage
@ Arkansas Razorbacks	10/23/10	loss 24 - 38	coverage
Auburn Tigers	10/30/10	loss 31 - 51	coverage
Louisiana Ragin Cajuns	11/6/10	win 43 - 21	coverage

 

Common drive charts? Yeah, we have one of those. Alabama versus us:

FULL SCREEN VERSION

Animated Drive Charts brought to you by Gameday Depot.

And Alabama versus them:

 

FULL SCREEN VERSION

 

Well. Alabama held both offenses to a mere 10 points. And can we conclude with respect to the defense that the difference is that Ole Miss played an entire game, and Tennessee just fell apart in the second half?

National Unit Rankings

Now on to the national rankings.

 

OFFENSIVE RANKINGS
Category	National Rank	Actual	National Leader	Actual	Conf Rank	SEC Leader	Actual
Rushing Offense	13	221.56	Georgia Tech	320.56	2	Auburn	307.20
Passing Offense	78	195.89	Hawaii	371.00	9	Arkansas	353.89
Total Offense	34	417.44	Oregon	567.22	5	Auburn	509.40
Scoring Offense	32	32.67	Oregon	54.67	6	Auburn	42.20
Passing Efficiency	50	134.46	Boise St.	191.79	7	Auburn	182.03
Sacks Allowed	12	.78	Marshall	.22	1	Mississippi	.78

 

Offensive observations. With highly-heralded Jeremiah Masoli at quarterback, I was surprised to see that the Rebels' passing offense isn't better than that. I also must not have been paying attention all season, because I had no idea their rushing game was so good. It balances out to be a pretty good offense, both in yards and in points. Oh, and we can probably forget about getting any sacks this game.

DEFENSIVE RANKINGS
Category	National Rank	Actual	National Leader	Actual	Conf Rank	SEC Leader	Actual
Rushing Defense	51	143.78	Kent St.	69.33	8	South Carolina	104.56
Pass Efficiency Defense	99	142.94	Miami (FL)	92.17	11	Alabama	100.03
Total Defense	69	375.67	TCU	215.50	10	LSU	282.89
Scoring Defense	100	32.89	TCU	8.50	12	Alabama	13.78
Pass Defense	86	231.89	TCU	121.90	8	LSU	157.67
Sacks	T-18	2.78	Florida St.	4.22	3	South Carolina	3.56
Tackles For Loss	32	6.67	Kent St.	9.33	6	Vanderbilt	7.56

 

Defensive observations. Heres a bit of good news. The defense the Vols will be going up against this weekend isn't that great. They're Top 20 in sacks, but other than that, they don't crack the top third. Scoring defense and pass efficiency defense are in the bottom third, and pass defense isn't much better. Tennessee should be able to pass all day and score a bunch of points against these guys.

SPECIAL TEAMS AND TURNOVERS RANKINGS
Category	National Rank	Actual	National Leader	Actual	Conf Rank	SEC Leader	Actual
Net Punting	109	32.67	Florida	42.06	12	Florida	42.06
Punt Returns	2	20.70	Utah	20.76	1	Mississippi	20.70
Kickoff Returns	96	20.12	Kansas St.	28.29	10	Auburn	26.17
Turnover Margin	61	-.11	Ohio St.	1.44	8	Mississippi St.	.78

 

Special teams and turnovers observations. UT will need to move Janzen Jackson back to gunner on punt return coverage and have its game face on in that phase, because Ole Miss ranks second in the nation in returning punts. Other than that, though, special teams is not a strength for the Rebs. Actually, that's a touch too nice. They're not good at special teams, except for returning punts, at which they excel. Go figure.

Statistical Comparison

Here's how the teams looked when the RTT BlogPoll Computery Thing chewed them up and spit them out.

Rank	Team	WL	SOS	PED	RD	3DO	TD	PEO	OPPG	TO	3DD
82		70	61	99	51	68	69	50	100	34	48
90		85	13	66	67	101	78	51	80	78	71

 

The most important thing here, I think, is the Strength of Schedule. Ole Miss has compiled its stats against a middle-of-the-road schedule, while Tennessee has compiled its own against a schedule that is one of 15th-most difficult in the nation. And UT still has better numbers than the Rebels in pass efficiency defense and opponents points per game, and it's not too far behind in rushing and total defense. Ole Miss is much better on third downs on offense, but with Gerald Jones back in the lineup, Tennessee is trending the right way and doing so quickly.

Players to watch for

Category	Player	National Rank	Actual
OFFENSE
Rushing	Brandon Bolden	50	80.78
	Jeff Scott		50.71
	Jeremiah Masoli		49.56
Passing Efficiency (Min. 15 Att./Game)	Jeremiah Masoli	53	130.03
Total Offense	Jeremiah Masoli	59	218.56
	Brandon Bolden		80.78
Receptions Per Game	Melvin Harris		2.78
	Brandon Bolden		2.67
Receiving Yards Per Game	Markeith Summers		48.44
	Melvin Harris		37.11
Scoring	Bryson Rose	T-27	8.67
	Brandon Bolden	T-41	8.00
DEFENSE
Interceptions	Charles Sawyer		.22
Sacks	Jonathan Cornell		.44
	Gerald Rivers		.36
	D.T. Shackleford		.33
	Allen Walker		.33
Tackles	Jonathan Cornell		7.00
	Damien Jackson		6.50
	Fon Ingram		6.00
	Johnny Brown		5.75
Tackles For Loss	Jonathan Cornell	T-26	1.38
	Jerrell Powe		.72
SPECIAL TEAMS
Punting (Min. 3.6 Punts/Game)	Tyler Campbell	20	44.74
Punt Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game)
Kickoff Returns (Min. 1.2 Ret./Game)	Jesse Grandy	92	21.77
Field Goals	Bryson Rose	T-16	1.56
All-Purpose Runners	Jesse Grandy	56	117.78
	Brandon Bolden	70	111.44

Observations

Offense. Again, I'm a little surprised at Masoli's numbers here. He's middle-of-the-pack, and none of his receivers are ranked. His main guys appear to be Markeith Summers and Melvin Harris, but they're averaging only 48.44 and 37.11 yards respectively. What makes them go is the ground game, led by junior running back Brandon Bolden, who is neck and neck with Tauren Poole in the national rankings. The backup, Jeff Scott, and Masoli each account for another 50 yards per game.

Defense. The only player ranked nationally for the Rebels is senior linebacker Jonathan Cornell, who's tied for 26th in tackles for loss. Note that he's a linebacker, not a defensive lineman. The two things Ole Miss does well on defense is sacks and tackles for loss, but of the five names on the leaderboard of those stat categories, only Gerald Rivers and Jerrell Powe are linemen, so my initial fear that our young offensive line was going to get dominated by a defensive line may be a bit misplaced. The havoc comes from mostly from the LBs. On the other hand, often the job of a D-line is to stalemate the o-line and allow the LBs to make those plays, so maybe the fear is well-founded.

Special teams. And here's the first big mystery and homework assignment for y'all. Ole Miss is second in the nation in punt returns, yet they have no single player who ranks nationally, so they must be using a lot of different guys. What's the story there? Other than that, they have a very good place kicker in Bryson Rose, so Tenessee will have to keep Ole Miss out of range.

Head to Head Comparisons

How'd we do with the head-to-head comparisons during Memphis week? Over-optimistic on rushing yards and under-optimistic on passing yards, rushing defense, and both scores, all of which bodes well for this week against Ole Miss.

	Prediction	Result
UT rush	160	130
UT pass	260	379
Memphis rush	100	64
Memphis pass	200	244
UT score	38	50
Memphis score	17	14

 

So let's see how we can do this week:

			Best Comparable(s)	Result Against Best Comp	Prediction
UT rush v. Ole Miss rush defense	119 (#97)	143.78 (#51)	UAB (153.11) (#64)	42	110
UT pass v. Ole Miss pass defense	232 (#53)	231.89 (#86)	UAB (247.89) (#101)	245	290
Ole Miss rush v. UT rush defense	156.33 (#67)	221.56 (#13)	Oregon (305.44) (#5)	245	220
Ole Miss pass v. UT pass defense	239.78 (#91)	195.89 (#78)	Florida (200.44) (#77)	167	170
UT scoring offense v. Ole Miss scoring defense	24.89 (#78)	32.89 (#100)	UAB (31.33) (#96)	23/32 (Reg./OT)	34
Ole Miss scoring offense v. UT scoring defense	28.67 (#80)	32.67 (#32)	Alabama (32.78) (#31)	41	32

 

As always, these are informed guesses rather than mathematical calculations. The general analytical framework is this: We are averaging X in a certain category. The opponent averages Y against that, which is most closely comparable to some identified previous opponent, against whom we did Z. All of that leads to an informed guess labeled as Prediction. The less data you have, the more sketchy the guess, and the guesses range from ALL CAPS SKETCHY WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS at the beginning of the season to merely lower case sketchy for the last game.

This week's example: Tennessee is rushing for 119 yards per game. Ole Miss is holding opponents to about 144 yards per game. The prior UT opponent that most closely resembles the Rebels' rush defense is UAB, against whom Tennessee ran for only 42 yards. But remember, Tauren Poole wasn't himself for that game, and he's had over 100 yards in three of the past five games, games that included South Carolina, Alabama, and LSU, teams with very strong defenses. Ole Miss is not a strong defense, so add some yards for that. Toss in a few yards for general post-Memphis WOO delusion, and we get 120 yards.

Note just how much I'm "ignoring" the numbers in the analysis above, and beware, I've done so in each of the predictions in the chart and included a general post-Memphis Tyler Bray WOO factor as well.

Sketchy Conclusions

• Ole Miss has played Auburn, Alabama, and Arkansas, but that's about it. The rest of the schedule is loaded with poor teams, so their stats should probably be discounted slightly. Tennessee has compiled its stats against a much stronger schedule.
• Forget about Jeremiah Masoli's arm. It's fine, but the strength of Ole Miss's offense is their ground game, which features running back Brandon Bolden, who ranks one spot behind Tauren Poole in the national rankings, and Jeff Scott and Masoli, who together add nearly another 100 rushing yards.
• The Rebels' defense is not good, but they do quite well in sacks and tackles for loss, most of which come not from defensive linemen, but from linebackers.
• Mystery! Ole Miss ranks second in the nation in punt returns, but no single player ranks nationally. They must be dabbling with a lot of different players, but what's the whole story here? Homework for y'all.

Predictions

• Tennessee 34, Ole Miss 32. But that's got a good deal of post-Memphis WOO in it, so beware.