/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/38641604/455409154.0.jpg)
As you would expect, playing a Top 5 team after a couple of weeks against middle-of-the-road competition has effected a widespread recalibration of the Tennessee Volunteers' statistical rankings. Let's see how things have shaken out.
What Tennessee is doing well
Now that we have an elite opponent in the mix, we can begin to really feel good about some of this green. To take the Rugrats on a plane for the first time to a place like Oklahoma against a national title contender and still be Top 10 in Fewest Penalty Yards Per Game and Fewest Penalties Per Game is quite remarkable. And the fact that Third Down for What made the trip as well is a testament to either the degree of earworminess of the song or that the defense is just playing really on third down. The team's also still good on both sides of the Fumbles Coin, which is great news. Punt Return Defense joins the party this week. He's a reall wallflower, that one. You don't even know when he's there, but you miss him when he's gone.
The Vols fell out of the Top 30 in 11 different categories this week. Those categories all over the board, which suggests that it's just a general overall recalibration. It's probably more who they really are at this point and who they will be against SEC competition.
Categories in which Tennessee is in the Top 30 | ||||||
Category | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
Utah St. |
Ark. St. | OK |
Fewest Penalty Yards Per Game | 51 | 67 | 21 | 43 | 11 | 3 |
3rd Down Conversion Pct Defense | 57 | 50 | 91 | 16 | 13 | 3 |
Fewest Penalties Per Game | 56 | 92 | 26 | 56 | 15 | 6 |
Fumbles Recovered | 71 | 113 | 29 | 19 | 22 | 22 |
Fumbles Lost | 6 | 28 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 23 |
Punt Return Defense | 85 | 67 | 92 | 85 | 60 | 27 |
Time of Possession | 37 | 116 | 91 | 44 | 22 | 27 |
The Dearly Departed: Turnovers Gained, Punt Returns, Team Passing Efficiency Defense, Turnover Margin, Team Tackles for Loss, Scoring Defense, First Downs Defense, Total Defense, Passing Yards Allowed, Turnovers Lost, and 3rd Down Conversion Percentage.
Where Tennessee needs major improvement
Where there was only one entry in this chart each of the last two weeks, there are now eight. This results in a Must Get Done Now List of (1) Get the run game going; (2) Step up efforts to find the deep passing game; and (3) Figure out how to strengthen the offensive line or at least mitigate its weaknesses.
Categories in which Tennessee is in the Bottom 30 | ||||||
Category | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Utah St. | Ark. St. | OK |
Total Offense | 104 | 18 | 102 | 79 | 81 | 93 |
Rushing Offense | 116 | 61 | 44 | 91 | 88 | 94 |
Tackles for Loss Allowed | 38 | 9 | 37 | 48 | 41 | 98 |
Team Passing Efficiency | 69 | 31 | 111 | 42 | 61 | 98 |
Red Zone Defense | 47 | 115 | 11 | 1 | 88 | 101 |
Passing Yards per Completion | 115 | 87 | 93 | 103 | ||
4th Down Conversion Pct | 91 | 80 | 76 | 62 | 89 | 106 |
Sacks Allowed | 40 | 5 | 21 | 65 | 66 | 109 |
Back in the Doghouse: Rushing Offense.
Just Escaped: None.
THE BIG FAT MIDDLE
And here's the rest, for tracking purposes.
Categories in which Tennessee is in the Middle of the Rankings | ||||||
Category | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Utah St. | Ark. St. | OK |
4th Down Conversion Pct Defense | 48 | 86 | 117 | 1 | 48 | 31 |
Turnovers Gained | 91 | 95 | 35 | 11 | 29 | 31 |
Passes Intercepted | 86 | 56 | 40 | 10 | 37 | 33 |
Punt Returns | 61 | 22 | 51 | 84 | 14 | 34 |
Team Passing Efficiency Defense | 58 | 21 | 25 | 35 | ||
Turnover Margin | 59 | 88 | 54 | 6 | 19 | 35 |
Team Tackles for Loss | 67 | 48 | 90 | 47 | 21 | 36 |
Scoring Defense | 36 | 104 | 78 | 10 | 21 | 38 |
First Downs Defense | 18 | 86 | 45 | 14 | 21 | 41 |
Total Defense | 28 | 107 | 83 | 22 | 29 | 42 |
Passing Yards Allowed | 12 | 111 | 27 | 31 | 30 | 45 |
Rushing Defense | 69 | 85 | 100 | 39 | 49 | 48 |
Turnovers Lost | 20 | 58 | 87 | 1 | 13 | 52 |
First Downs Offense | 98 | 20 | 101 | 47 | 48 | 53 |
Red Zone Offense | 58 | 29 | 100 | 1 | 44 | 55 |
3rd Down Conversion Pct | 56 | 81 | 92 | 57 | 8 | 63 |
Kickoff Returns | 41 | 80 | 20 | 84 | 68 | 63 |
Passing Offense | 50 | 15 | 109 | 44 | 54 | 68 |
Kickoff Return Defense | 7 | 47 | 118 | 62 | 76 | 73 |
Passes Had Intercepted | 63 | 83 | 107 | 1 | 34 | 76 |
Net Punting | 104 | 52 | 28 | 70 | 76 | 78 |
Team Sacks | 100 | 98 | 99 | 73 | 58 | 78 |
Scoring Offense | 106 | 22 | 94 | 41 | 48 | 83 |
Players in the Top 30
Player | Stat | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Utah St. | Ark. St. | OK |
Cameron Sutton | Fumbles Recovered | 11 | 14 | ||||
Todd Kelly, Jr. | Fumbles Recovered | 4 | 14 | ||||
Jalen Reevesd-Maybin | Fumbles Recovered | 14 | |||||
Justin Worley | Completions Per Game | 22 | 29 | ||||
Todd Kelly, Jr. | Fumbles Recovered | 11 | |||||
Justin Worley | Passing TDs | 15 | |||||
Justin Worley | Points Responsible For | 16 | |||||
Marquez North | Receiving TDs | 17 | |||||
Justin Worley | Points Responsible For Per Game | 18 | |||||
A.J. Johnson | Passed Defended | 17 | 20 | ||||
Aaron Medley | Field Goals Per Game | 26 | |||||
Owen Williams | Sacks | 29 | |||||
A.J. Johnson | Forced Fumbles | 3 | |||||
A.J. Johnson | Interceptions | 4 | |||||
Cameron Sutton | Interceptions | 4 | |||||
Justin Worley | Completion Percentage | 16 | |||||
Dontavis Sapp | Fumbles Recovered | 9 | |||||
Michael Palardy | Punting | 11 | |||||
Devaun Swafford | Punt Return TDs | 14 | |||||
A.J. Johnson | Tackles | 4 | |||||
Byron Moore | Interceptions | 13 | |||||
Cordarrelle Patterson | Kickoff Returns | 14 | |||||
Cordarrelle Patterson | All-Purpose Runners | 16 | |||||
Tyler Bray | Total Offense | 19 | |||||
Justin Hunter | Receiving Yards Per Game | 22 | |||||
Devrin Young | Punt Returns | 28 | |||||
Tyler Bray | Passing Efficiency | 29 | |||||
Austin Johnson | Interceptions | 23 |